JOHNN111

Page: « Prev 1 2 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 24 25 Next »

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Mon 12/31/12 10:49 AM Topic: ***The Clean Cove*** - part 16

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Mon 12/31/12 10:30 AM Topic: deal reached to stop $7 milk But 7$ Gas is still in the works!

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Mon 12/31/12 10:10 AM Topic: WOULD YOU DATE YOURSELF? QUOTE: Would you date yourself Oh hell yes! I'd do myself like nobody's business, I wouldn't complain about the high frequency of sheer passion and lust for myself either. Edited by JOHNN111 on Mon 12/31/12 10:13 AM

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Fri 12/28/12 10:51 AM Topic: Does no mean no? QUOTE: QUOTE: I do have to wonder exactly what is considered a tease, too. I would also hope that a guy who cannot handle doing anything and stopping would speak up beforehand and say that in the beginning. So, people should talk about limits before anything happens. No, I think Men who can't control their sexual urges should.

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Fri 12/28/12 10:32 AM Topic: Does no mean no? QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: No always means no! Yeah... I'm confused on why this is confusing? Guys if a woman says NO... forget what her body says.. The police will only accept what she said!! And what confuses me is why is it that a woman can be a cock tease and not suffer her share of punishment. I am not condoning rape but to condone a woman's bad behavior is just as hypocritical. A fishing worm does not want to be bait yet a few women out there think it is funny to bait men. Not all women deserve what they get since they did nothing to earn it but what of the woman who instigates trouble, gets it, and cries rape? Example, remember last year that Lacrosse team that was accused by a woman of raping her and then it was proven she was not raped, made the whole thing up, and ruined a bunch of lives... This is how I see this who NO argument being twisted on itself. No means no EXCEPT WHEN A WOMAN IS BEING A TEASE INTENTIONALLY! Then No means NOTHING at least to me no matter how people want to word the law. I just want it clear that people who use the law to victimize others are raping people with the law! Again the Lacrosse team example! I deleted my earlier response because I felt it was too personal but maybe it needs to be said. Andy, your line of thinking is the same rationale my rapist gave to me when he was done. He explained this to me as he drove me back to my dorm room. I was crying and bleeding. But I guess I deserved what I got for making out with him. Unfortunately, it's impossible to know what some men will consider being a tease vs. making out a bit and then stopping. If you are going to insist upon raping a woman after a certain point perhaps you could let her know ahead of time where exactly that line is so she doesn't accidentally cross it. Thanks, a former victim. Unfortunately, It really needed to be said on this thread! Ruth!

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Fri 12/28/12 10:22 AM Topic: What r u thinking about right now?? - part 38 Thinking... Can't be done on time... Batten down the hatches!!!!!

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Fri 12/28/12 07:55 AM Topic: Newspaper prints gun owners names and addresses- how stupi That's f@cked up... Why is this information even accessible?

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Fri 12/28/12 07:39 AM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: QUOTE: Let me put your worries to rest, let's assume they are completely tamper proof maybe? Why would we assume that when it has not been true of any other technology? I am not against such tech, mandating it is a mistake. Mandating new weapon safeguards IS NOT a mistake I'm still waiting on YOUR suggestions!

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Fri 12/28/12 07:07 AM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Well WTF do you expect? Not one of you pro-gunners offers up a solution... All we hear is "We need to protect ourselves" or "that will never work" How do you solve any problem? First understanding why it happened. For things such as this, that is not easy, it takes understanding a person who by normal standards is not understandable. Most of us would exclaim that we cannot understand such behavior. So asking what it takes to understand such behavior is the first step. That first step has not happened, you have to engage in problem solving, that is not happening here. Right here what we have is political sound bytes being tossed around and nothing more. It is hard to understand what caused such behavior, its much easier and politically advantageous to go after guns. It was suggested that more gun handling education is needed... I think the individuals knew EXACTLY how to use their weapons... So yea, let's keep talking and trying to figure out what was going on in the killers head at the time... case by case, we should have it figured out in... ummm ermmm NEVER! Ok so... Registered, legal, responsible gun owner don't want to hand in their weapons? I see No prob if the weapon is handled right and out of reach of anyone else. So why are these responsible gun owners not taking a solid stand against illegal acquisition of firearms? "They" above everyone else should be fighting hard to keep em out of the wrong hands. Your weapons are falling into the wrong hands, what you gonna do about it Bushido? Almost unintelligible and you did nothing to address what I said. BTW, none of my guns have been stolen, none of them has ever been used to murder anyone. So my track record is perfect, so speak for yourself, or point to specific incidents if you want out whatever you want to, but don't make **** up. I will AGAIN ask you a question! Would a gun trigger lock have prevented YOU from doing this if you had your mind set? Place yourself in the shooters position and ask if the law in question would stop you . . . If yes, then your an not as devious as the people who plan these shooting out, if no then why would we consider this simplistic solution to be an effective strategy to stop this complex problem? Horsechit!... You know exactly what I'm talking about, in reference to "your guns", I didn't mean yours in particular, I meant gun owners weapons are ending up in the wrong hands... plz don't act like an idiot, you're clearly not. Murking up the waters in serious discussions is beneath you Sir. So back to the topic, you claim it's not feasible because of tampering & hacking? Let me put your worries to rest, let's assume they are completely tamper proof maybe? here's one such type: TriggerSmart The Irish company TriggerSmart claims to have achieved a working prototype of a personalized gun in the summer of 2012 that works using radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology.[9] TriggerSmart co-owner Robert McNamara said in December 2012 that he has spoken with "household name" American gun makers about licensing his product, but that none wanted to be first to employ the technology. "They're concerned about the liability aspect. When you put it in one gun you'll have to put it in every gun," he said.[10] The smart gun is supposed to: Reduce the likelihood of unintentional injuries to children Preventing teenage suicides and homicides. Limit the violent acts committed by criminals using stolen guns. Protect law enforcement officers from criminals grabbing their firearms during a struggle. Here are some fun world facts: Firearms Death Rate (per 100,000, age adjusted) for Selected Countries in one year between 1990 and 1995 (Krug, Powell and Dahlberg, 1998) Firearms Deaths by Mode of Death for Children <15 Years of Age Top 10 Countries - Rate per 100,000 I'm sure you'll agree... Much room for improvement... But again, you're completely without suggestions... Murk it up buddy! EDIT* QUOTE: I will AGAIN ask you a question! Would a gun trigger lock have prevented YOU from doing this if you had your mind set? Place yourself in the shooters position and ask if the law in question would stop you . . . Since Most of your senseless murders are by lowlife thugs... It's probably easier for them to get some other unlocked weapon instead of trying to jimmyrig the "chip" trigger lock. Thinking like a thug, I'd find another gun if I chose this kind of life. Increasing the price of new weapons, automatically increases the cost of a stolen or used weapon, Which makes it much harder for the dumbazzez to afford... Organized criminal elements have the resources to afford them but are much less likely to commit home invasions or random muggings. Yes/ No? Edited by JOHNN111 on Fri 12/28/12 07:37 AM

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 02:11 PM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: QUOTE: Well WTF do you expect? Not one of you pro-gunners offers up a solution... All we hear is "We need to protect ourselves" or "that will never work" How do you solve any problem? First understanding why it happened. For things such as this, that is not easy, it takes understanding a person who by normal standards is not understandable. Most of us would exclaim that we cannot understand such behavior. So asking what it takes to understand such behavior is the first step. That first step has not happened, you have to engage in problem solving, that is not happening here. Right here what we have is political sound bytes being tossed around and nothing more. It is hard to understand what caused such behavior, its much easier and politically advantageous to go after guns. It was suggested that more gun handling education is needed... I think the individuals knew EXACTLY how to use their weapons... So yea, let's keep talking and trying to figure out what was going on in the killers head at the time... case by case, we should have it figured out in... ummm ermmm NEVER! Ok so... Registered, legal, responsible gun owner don't want to hand in their weapons? I see No prob if the weapon is handled right and out of reach of anyone else. So why are these responsible gun owners not taking a solid stand against illegal acquisition of firearms? "They" above everyone else should be fighting hard to keep em out of the wrong hands. Your weapons are falling into the wrong hands, what you gonna do about it Bushido?

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 01:11 PM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Fingerprint Biometric technology for firearms has been around for 10years+... Gun lobby thinks it's too expensive, it would certainly help with all future generations of gun owners. too expensive? so what? weapons should be expensive IMO LOL So a person who cannot afford one would be denied the ability to protect themselves? That's not quite right... regulations on "new gun" ownership should include biometric technology... end of story. Yea, which would mean that when that tech is mandated in all new weapons and the price of those weapons in some cases doubles, which then puts it out of the range of ownership for the poorest of Americans . . . yea, it effectively makes guns unattainable for the people who are poor. Guns are a part of a criminals business model. It is essential to there business. The cost is a business cost, even if the cost is much much higher than what a civilian is willing to pay, they would pay it, even if it meant hacking the technology used to restrict access to the firearm. What you are asking would have NO effect on gun violence, but would have an effect on the poorest segments of our population from being able to defend themselves. Aw Cmon... Find solutions man not add more obstacles. There are enough saturday night specials out there to satisfy ALL of your poorest neighborhoods already.... Canada's & Mexico's poorest neighborhoods too Sure . . . that's the answer. More throw away comments. Well WTF do you expect? Not one of you pro-gunners offers up a solution... All we hear is "We need to protect ourselves" or "that will never work"

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 01:03 PM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Fingerprint Biometric technology for firearms has been around for 10years+... Gun lobby thinks it's too expensive, it would certainly help with all future generations of gun owners. too expensive? so what? weapons should be expensive IMO LOL So a person who cannot afford one would be denied the ability to protect themselves? That's not quite right... regulations on "new gun" ownership should include biometric technology... end of story. Yea, which would mean that when that tech is mandated in all new weapons and the price of those weapons in some cases doubles, which then puts it out of the range of ownership for the poorest of Americans . . . yea, it effectively makes guns unattainable for the people who are poor. Guns are a part of a criminals business model. It is essential to there business. The cost is a business cost, even if the cost is much much higher than what a civilian is willing to pay, they would pay it, even if it meant hacking the technology used to restrict access to the firearm. What you are asking would have NO effect on gun violence, but would have an effect on the poorest segments of our population from being able to defend themselves. Aw Cmon... Find solutions man not add more obstacles. There are enough saturday night specials out there to satisfy ALL of your poorest neighborhoods already.... Canada's & Mexico's poorest neighborhoods too

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 12:49 PM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: QUOTE: Fingerprint Biometric technology for firearms has been around for 10years+... Gun lobby thinks it's too expensive, it would certainly help with all future generations of gun owners. too expensive? so what? weapons should be expensive IMO LOL So a person who cannot afford one would be denied the ability to protect themselves? That's not quite right... regulations on "new gun" ownership should include biometric technology... end of story.

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 12:40 PM Topic: help with gun control QUOTE: Many laws and regulations are unjust, unconstitutional in the fact that they are democratic (the rule of a mob) rather than freedoms allowed under a Republic.....which our country is supposed to be! A wise dude on here once said: "Your right to swing your fists ends where my nose begins" So yea... cigarette Smoke falls into this category IMO

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 12:28 PM Topic: Petition submitted to deport Piers Morgan I figure if they still let the prez of Iran in the US... Piers ain't so bad

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 12:04 PM Topic: help with gun control Fingerprint Biometric technology for firearms has been around for 10years+... Gun lobby thinks it's too expensive, it would certainly help with all future generations of gun owners. too expensive? so what? weapons should be expensive IMO LOL

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 11:57 AM Topic: ***The Clean Cove*** - part 16 QUOTE: I miss 2Kids... QUOTE: I miss 2kids too. QUOTE: I miss 2kids too. Ditto on 2kids!

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Wed 12/26/12 11:37 AM Topic: !!!!! <<< The New 4:20 Clubhouse>>> !!!!!! - part 27 QUOTE: Is Christmas like, Boxing Day or something in the frozen north? It is sunny and bright here, a wonderful day, fire going, love in the air, and a spiral ham all cooked and leftover with mashed potatoes and green beans and bacon :-) Merry Christmas you handsome devil, I hope your stocking is full of greased lightining :-) Well Christmas in the North is like any other day really... except for shutdown, fantastic food, great family & friends, binge drinking and Shmokin all combined... Boxing day is more like healing the drinking & eating wounds... By Shmokin!!! All the best Soufie! Send my regards the Kman too... Tell him he's been slackin around here

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Mon 12/24/12 10:44 AM Topic: One gun owners opinion,,, QUOTE: do bullets from this gun somehow keep people 'safer' than bullets from this one,, the TOP weapon scares me to death, I dont think even a hunter or target shooter would use or need it, cant figure any civilian reason for it either,,,, the bottom weapon, fires bullets just as deadly, but at far fewer rounds per second,,,,, How soon we forget... The cops had to emergency shop at the gun store! FREEDOM!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqfrr26yTSY

JOHNN111 Joined Wed 05/13/09 Posts: 4740	Mon 12/24/12 10:29 AM Topic: One gun owners opinion,,, I don't know you Sir Soul... Unless you're Captn Crunch or something, I'll just assume you'll be too busy saving your own arse mon! Cool?

Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 24 25 Next »