Community > Posts By > Zapchaser

 
Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:55 PM

Tell me how much you know about GPS Steve.
All three words!laugh laugh laugh

I am not your teacher. I can assure you that you would have been the first one booted from my classroom. Look it up. You know, in the same manner you look everything else up. Incorrectly. drinker laugh laugh laugh

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:51 PM
Edited by Zapchaser on Sun 08/10/08 07:52 PM

If your real good though we will let you play with our GI Joe!!bigsmile

No thanks, only someone that takes it up the pooper would have one of those. I never had dolls of any kind. Sorry for you but to each their own. whoa
Our? You have a friend (hee hee) with you that shares your doll?

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:48 PM

Sure why not, You dont keep up with anything anyway!!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


Its impossible to keep up with you Glenn. You keep changing it up. It's like arguing a point with a child.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:46 PM

You couldn't handle it navy boy!
It takes gonads to do what we did!laugh laugh laugh

Ah, when no substantive retort is available you resort to childish babbling. We called em balls. Only a geek would call em gonads. Furthermore, women were not on combatant ships as well as in combat roles with the Army when you and I were in.
And if you "handled someone's gonads" I would appreciate you keeping that to yourself.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:40 PM


And your point being? We still have greater tech and electronics. We are currently upgrading the sonar equipment on our sea hawk helicopters to better find subs. We have over 10X their funding. We have unmanned aircrafts that can see anywhere in the world in a matter of minutes, stealth bombers, the A-10 is getting a major overhaul, and so on.


Did you not see where the Chinese shot down a satellite?

Do you know how GPS works?

I do, and with only two spares in orbit around the earth, if you knock one down our GPS is useless in that part of the globe for at least two hours.
Knock three down and its down even longer and we have no more spares!

Glenn, not only is my background in avionics but I taught electronics for two years. Wanna go there?

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:35 PM





They even have a newer sub. works of air independent propulsion driven by hydrogen fuel cell technology!
Can stay submerged for up to 50 days!

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/677-specs.htm

If you cant find it you cant kill it!

They have a new stealth missile frigate too.
Rated best in the world!!

Uh, ever hear of sonabuoys? Anti-submarine aircraft? Subrocs? A nuclear sub is on patrol, stocked with food and hopefully enough toilet paper laugh for up to six months submerged. We saw how their nuclear program worked. Their game, as it has always been, is quantity over quality.


You are talking old school.
There have been new improvements. Russia has stealth tech as evidenced by the sub that surfaced in the middle of the Kitty Hawk fleet during exercises.
The US Fleet didnt even know it was there until it surfaced!

AGAIN. I w i l l t y p e s l o w e r. We sneak up on them and occasionally get through their defenses as well. We called them war games.


Again,
R e a d
H o w
T h e
U S N a v y
S a i d
they were caught with egg on their face!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


Again:
READ
WHAT
I
SAID!

The Russians won't publish it when we surprise them. What are you not getting? You didn't play war games with unfriendlies out on your little camping excursions shooting at trees and the occasional beaver so I can understand, possibly, why you are so clueless about naval issues. No, not navel. That is what you picked the lint out of in your tent before beddy bye. laugh drinker

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:30 PM


Its ok Zapchaser. You know and I know.... and Russia knows. We wont even go into the "Advanced Digital Receiver Processor Electronic Warfare System".

drinker


At least your reading about what we have.
Now read what Russia has!!laugh laugh laugh laugh

You should start building your bomb shelter then. Stockpile the SPAM. It keeps our folks at the Hormel plant working. It must be really hard on you knowing that no one has the wealth of knowledge that you alone command, eh? That is an awesome responsibility for one lonely soul. drinker

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:25 PM

Its good to see y'all are impressed with each other.
I dont see why, but it y'alls prerogative!laugh laugh laugh laugh

There can be no winner Chaz, dont you get it!
Y'all really do need to update yourselves on Russian weaponry!

There's a few of you on here who seem to live in a fantasy world all your own!noway noway noway

You didn't understand a word I said did you?

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:23 PM

Its ok Zapchaser. You know and I know.... and Russia knows. We wont even go into the "Advanced Digital Receiver Processor Electronic Warfare System".

drinker
laugh laugh laugh

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:15 PM
Edited by Zapchaser on Sun 08/10/08 07:22 PM

If you think we can go into a conventional war with Russia and not lose ships your all crazy!
The whole idea is completely absurd and will never happen unless someone screws up!



Stop with the diversionary tactics will you? Nobody said we wouldn't lose any ships. People die in wars. Vessels are lost. Aircraft, tanks, etc. It would be foolish for us to go to war with Russia. As they were getting trounced they would pull the pin on their nuke arsenal and given the inaccuracy of anything Russian, the numbers alone would be catastrophic if not for direct hits, the fallout would reach around the world.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:14 PM

Our torpedo's are bigger...

Unless one drives a fancy expensive sports car, then supposedly they have a small torpedo. laugh

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:13 PM

Here's their newest Nuclear powered sub!

Russia has launched its first new-generation nuclear submarine since the fall of the Soviet Union, the submarine's maker said on Wednesday.
The Bellona Foundation, 13/02-2008
The Yury Dolgoruky was launched at Russia's secretive Sevmash shipyard in the Arctic town of Severodvinsk on Tuesday night. "The atomic submarine Yuri Dolgoruky was launched into the water," Sevmash said in a short statement.

Named after a Slavic prince who helped to defend Moscow, the Borei-class submarine can carry 107 sailors for 100 days without surfacing, Reuters reported.

Russian Navy site!

http://www.bellona.org/news/news_2008/Yury_dogloruky

Glenn! Oh my God! You ripped Sergey for stating what he knows from Russian media as being pure propaganda and now you are citing it? Gotta be right at ANY cost no matter what the subject and whether the info source is credible or not eh? As long as you are righ? Okay this should get you a little chubby: YOU ARE RIGHT! WHATEVER THE SUBJECT....... YOU ARE RIGHT! Happy now? I'll give you a minute or two to go on a date with Rosie to celebrate. Good God!

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:06 PM



They even have a newer sub. works of air independent propulsion driven by hydrogen fuel cell technology!
Can stay submerged for up to 50 days!

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/677-specs.htm

If you cant find it you cant kill it!

They have a new stealth missile frigate too.
Rated best in the world!!

Uh, ever hear of sonabuoys? Anti-submarine aircraft? Subrocs? A nuclear sub is on patrol, stocked with food and hopefully enough toilet paper laugh for up to six months submerged. We saw how their nuclear program worked. Their game, as it has always been, is quantity over quality.


You are talking old school.
There have been new improvements. Russia has stealth tech as evidenced by the sub that surfaced in the middle of the Kitty Hawk fleet during exercises.
The US Fleet didnt even know it was there until it surfaced!

AGAIN. I w i l l t y p e s l o w e r. We sneak up on them and occasionally get through their defenses as well. We called them war games.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 07:03 PM



They even have a newer sub. works of air independent propulsion driven by hydrogen fuel cell technology!
Can stay submerged for up to 50 days!

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/677-specs.htm

If you cant find it you cant kill it!

They have a new stealth missile frigate too.
Rated best in the world!!

Uh, ever hear of sonabuoys? Anti-submarine aircraft? Subrocs? A nuclear sub is on patrol, stocked with food and hopefully enough toilet paper laugh for up to six months submerged. We saw how their nuclear program worked. Their game, as it has always been, is quantity over quality.


Yea, I will be working on the Sea/Knighthawks. Might even be testing the sonar.

You ROCK! They also use FLIR which is pretty cool. drinker

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 06:59 PM

Where is the great and powerfull United Nations that I hear the majority of you squaking about? And Georgia has only two thousand troops on the ground for political reasons. It sounds a lot like the people who call the U.S. cowards couldn't give a crap about the U.S. until their own country where their true loyalties lie come under attack and then its okay to go to war. Feel free to go back and defend your motherland Comrade. I would defend the United States if it happened. Let me know how that works out for you.

Don't worry about Gary numerous names and differing gender profiles, aka his newest one. Zero credibility.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 06:56 PM
Edited by Zapchaser on Sun 08/10/08 06:56 PM

They even have a newer sub. works of air independent propulsion driven by hydrogen fuel cell technology!
Can stay submerged for up to 50 days!

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/677-specs.htm

If you cant find it you cant kill it!

They have a new stealth missile frigate too.
Rated best in the world!!

Uh, ever hear of sonabuoys? Anti-submarine aircraft? Subrocs? A nuclear sub is on patrol, stocked with food and hopefully enough toilet paper laugh for up to six months submerged. We saw how their nuclear program worked. Their game, as it has always been, is quantity over quality.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 06:51 PM

If you dont believe that one check here!

http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_74.html
Same sub!

Plus they have a Torpedo with a 60 mile range! The link is above, as well as link where a Russian sub sold to the Chinese surprised the Kitty Hawk and all her protective vessels!

Still not impressed. Do you not think for a moment that we sneak up on them as well? I have pictures of a Bear that flew by us, escorted by three F-14's. We also have the Phoenix missile system. They don't have anything comparable. Russian spy ships disguised as fishing trawlers used to steam up alongside us on a regular basis and when as close as they could safely come, the antenna's would pop out and the sailors would run on deck with cameras clicking. A group of us mooned them one day in the Mediterranean off Greece. You won't see the Russians publish OUR surprises though.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 06:28 PM
Correct. We should not even be considering going to war with anyone. I was merely pointing out fanta's humerous and uneducated comparison.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 06:25 PM



The United States could easily take Russia in a military conflict, but given the blatant disregard of military facts in this forum, don't expect that to be the consensus here.

Correct. Our technologically superior nuclear navy trumps the dog slow diesel/electric subs of WW2 technology. They need to surface to recharge their batteries and are limited in fuel capacity. Our subs can submerge for up to twelve years without refueling the core.They are limited by food supply alone.The Seawolf class of subs (Ships float, boats submerge Glenn)were cold war vintage and I believe the last was the Jimmy Carter. The new much faster attack subs were the Virginia Class if I remember correctly and that was in the late seventies so I am sure they have a new class by now. Concerning the Kitty Hawk, she is a diesel powered carrier of the Vietnam era and is like a Hyundai sitting in your driveway. A small carrier compared to the Nimitz class carriers of which all are since the Nimitz, CVN-68, of which I sailed on for three years. It, and its sister ships, are nuclear powered and can run circles around anything the Russians have to offer in the line of carriers although it would never get to that. Carrier battle groups protect the carriers as well as the attack subs that constantly sail with them.


Well now its offfical!
We've heard from all of the uninformed about the current technologies!

Do you people even read, or do you just type hoping people will believe in Bullshet!!laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Glenn, you are quoting sources that are inaccurate. I spent eight years in the military. Three of them aboard a carrier while you were out swatting at mosquitoes. Do you really think you know anything about the Navy? Did you realize you were comparing apples and oranges? Prove me wrong. Moron.

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 06:15 PM

The United States could easily take Russia in a military conflict, but given the blatant disregard of military facts in this forum, don't expect that to be the consensus here.

Correct. Our technologically superior nuclear navy trumps the dog slow diesel/electric subs of WW2 technology. They need to surface to recharge their batteries and are limited in fuel capacity. Our subs can submerge for up to twelve years without refueling the core.They are limited by food supply alone.The Seawolf class of subs (Ships float, boats submerge Glenn)were cold war vintage and I believe the last was the Jimmy Carter. The new much faster attack subs were the Virginia Class if I remember correctly and that was in the late seventies so I am sure they have a new class by now. Concerning the Kitty Hawk, she is a diesel powered carrier of the Vietnam era and is like a Hyundai sitting in your driveway. A small carrier compared to the Nimitz class carriers of which all are since the Nimitz, CVN-68, of which I sailed on for three years. It, and its sister ships, are nuclear powered and can run circles around anything the Russians have to offer in the line of carriers although it would never get to that. Carrier battle groups protect the carriers as well as the attack subs that constantly sail with them.

1 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 Next