'the people' get what they vote for , its their choice

there is the option to write in, if the 'people' were ever so terribly disappointed with the dozens of choices they ALREADY Get in the process,,,

the internet has facts, the way the streets have drugs

of course they are there , in all the nonsense and filth,,,,but unfortunately far too many dont know the diff between the former and the latter,,,

totally aware

the INTERNET provides us with plenty of search engines,, and plenty of false information/factoids/ opinions posing as facts

to go along with them,,,

if ' not of the mind' means I Require factual proof and not just opinions,,

you are right

and I totally understand, it show I feel about people arguing the legitimacy of the bible or existence of God


guess you know what you know without being able to actually PROVE It,,,

just like I do


I dont know what posts you are referring to, I let others decide what 'free' means to them

I feel plenty 'free',, and much more 'free' than the majority of the world

can america improve,, Absolutely,,,

do I feel like I am living in a 'dicatatorship' or my 'freedom' is less than at any other time (Except maybe religiously),,,,No

in fact, I think america may be becoming so 'free' as to become stupid ,,,,

wikipedia is one source, but not necessarily the authority as its an anonymously written one,,with no real oversight of its veracity

from wikipedia itself:
Wikipedia is written collaboratively by largely anonymous Internet volunteers who write without pay. Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism. Users can contribute anonymously, under a pseudonym, or, if they choose to, with their real identity

alot of ad hominem responses with very little factual or logical debate,,,,

guess its become an irrelevant thread,,,,

alot of ad hominem responses with very little factual or logical debate,,,,

guess its become an irrelevant thread,,,,

facts because they are found on google,,,,,


love that internet,,,

Sometimes Satan sets people in our paths in order to destroy us because he knows that we will sacrifice the things we should be doing in order to minister to the "needy" and "weak" one. We must be discerning enough to know when to say when and how to concretely place limits upon people. Swine don’t deserve pearls of wisdom because all they will do with the wise counsel is roll around with it in the mud.

We should always pray for people, and there is never a reason to give up hope. However, there is a time to let a person be and let God deal with them alone. There are many true seekers who need our help, so we need to beware of the impostors, the swine who at first don’t seem to be so.

We must learn discernment and who is truly humble, teachable, and willing to learn and change. Why is this so important? Because the swine do more than just ruin pearls; their purpose is to ruin us. The swine to whom we keep giving our precious pearls of energy, time, wisdom, and sacrifice are not really interested in the pearls as they profess to be but in, as Jesus says, turning and tearing us to pieces. They were never interested in the truth or in turning from sin but rather in destroying us and feasting upon us. As we function in the church long enough, we will encounter these people. We must be careful and watch out for the swine because our very spiritual, physical, emotional, and financial well-beings are at stake.

Lord, you have sent us out as sheep among wolves. Please enable us to have discernment to know where the ground is fertile and where to sow our seeds. Help us to be shrewd as serpents yet innocent as doves (Matthew 10:16). Protect us, preserve us, and lead us in all wisdom, power, and strength to bear abundant fruit for Your kingdom. In Christ’s name, Amen.

yet, its understandable enough to declare that it conflicts with the constitution?

interesting,,

constitution was WRITTEN BY THE GOVERNMENT,,lol

it relates to FEDERAL LAWS< and whats not SPECIFICALLY there is up to the states

and common sense has NOTHING to do with operating a motor vehicle,,,


we vote in the people we want, and if they dont do what we want than we gripe and complain about 'freedoms',,,,,because of course, there is going to be a decision one day that will please all 300 million americans and what they feel they should be 'free' to do,,,

if it was a dictatorship, why would there be 'promises' broken?

our government is over five hundred people who are all ELECTED by americans,, time to deal with it as a reflection of AMERICANS And not some outcast 'dictator' group

I wasnt making the claim about EOs,,,

I did research, by looking on the ACTUAL WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE for the explanation of an EO......

not providing coop commentaries from individuals about what they THINK it is

I actually READ EO's as opposed to making up my mind on others opiniions

I understand why noone can provide me an ACTUAL EO that conflicts with the constititution or doesnt do precisely what the definition says it does,,,

I agree, life would be one 'freedom' we are endowed with

and if thats THE definition of 'free' to you,, than we are free

the conditions of how we live amongst others though, is not God endowed, but constructed by the environment and society we live in,,,

what are the sources of these explanations?

and can I Get an example of an ACTUAL EO That conflicts with the constititution?

Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government

so why are people complaining about them?

lol,, she obviously didnt have the time, energy, resources or SPACE....

no kidding they arent laws,, they are EXECUTIVE policies from the EXECUTIVE HEAD

wow,, ok,,,

1st, presidents dont set STATE laws,, a statement of supporting state laws is not the same as SETTING Them,,,,,I support it too,, DNA Has been proven to exhonnerate people and is a useful tool when those who have previous ARRESTS become suspects,,,,


2nd The DNA collection is VOLUNTARY, with no id tag, and also a STATE program to study driving habits , its explained here in another thread,, ALSO NOTHING TO DO WITH OBAMA

1. President is the HEAD OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH,, Executive orders have to do with determining the policies within the branch HE IS HEAD OF,,,,,its not a conspiracy, nor does it destroy the constitution

2. I still have NO example of an ACTUAL EO that 'destroys' the constitution,,,but I wasnt really expecting one,,,