|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Put a button that will set off a terrible electric shock to the person pressing it and tell a stupid idiot to NOT press the button!
THAT IS ENTERTAINMENT! |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
I Just can't take it any more!!!
How bout all of you???? |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
Soft and fluffy...
It's a TRIBBLE!
Keep it out of your pantry! |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
Not down with bull chit!
I see this in so many profiles and hear it from so many people but why is it the people who recite this as their mantra (men and women) are the worst bullchit artists out there?
Isn't it bad enough we are lied to by elected officials, people around us, and the media? |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Leaving us lag and tail men out huh?
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
I was off the tit somewhere before 2 years old. According to my mom I wanted adult food more than anything else. I have seen a woman who nursed her son until he was seven and ended that because other women gave her a LOT of hell over that. Most of the women I spoke with about that one said that by three years old all children should be off the teat and that women do not normally lactate all that long anyways. The fact is some people should never have kids. Most doctors say that by two years old children are fully capable of digesting regular food. but there are those women who have to argue that they are women and know better.
Yep, sure, whatever. They can believe wheat they want. Its a big world. And some of you women wonder where men get their titty fixation? |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
O. K.
I am board out of my skull. A date this weekend would be nice for a change. My last one was a while ago and boy was that a disaster! So what woman out there has the guts to ask first? I am done with asking first since the answer is ALWAYS the same, MAYBE (ending with a "I changed my mind" later or the date is a dud because women generally will not say what they want to do.) For once I would like to have someone else do some of the thinking at least. I am a lousy mind reader and a LOUSY signal reader! I can read a book just fine. I just find reading a book far more boring than trying to find my own adventures. There is the key word, ADVENTURE!
So was up this weekend besides the same old? |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
MADNESS, INSANITY!!!
What are your favorite ways of dealing with it? Electrified nets? Genetically altered Kill Kittens? SHARKS WITH FRIKKEN LASER BEAMS ON THEIR HEADS? A hammer, a piece of string and a cherry?
Illustrate your coping skills! |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
A question of tolerance...
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: few people are not 'tolerant' of religion or lack of religion people just have opinions about them we live in a country where there is no choice but to 'tolerate',,,basically So in essence if say I started a religion based on PURE hedonism, I mean an absolute desire of fulfilling personal self indulgences of any kind, and preach that in hedonism you can do no wrong. Now one of my faithful desires to murder and rape women, NO! Let's really up the stakes, likes to murder and rape little boys under 7 years old because their screaming makes him get off. Now lets say that because of religious tenant of hedonism that person has done nothing wrong and our church supports his actions. Now in normal society we would be aghast at someone doing something like this to someone. Worst and ultimately hypocritically that church would be branded a cult. Could you tolerate a religion where "Anything" goes? ESPECIALLY knowing that it could very well be you who something happens to next? How fine is the line between religion and cult? As far as I see it myself i see them both as very reflexive terms. It just matters on scale mostly. It is one thing to tolerate a person of Islamic heritage since all people can change. People are entitled to make mistakes as long as they don't harm one another BUT to blindly accept a faith who preaches the core values that Islam does? I am not a big fan of "Agape" or blind tolerance of anything. Would Christianity be less tolerable if it preached subjugation and murder? Lying cheating and stealing from anyone of any faith is wrong by Christian standards but does Islam draw the same moral lines? If you say yes I am going to dump a lot of passages from the Quaran on you that say otherwise. So are you confusing tolerance for a person or tolerance for a faith practice? re posted for clarity few people are not 'tolerant' of religion or lack of religion people just have opinions about them we live in a country where there is no choice but to 'tolerate',,,basically when talking BELIEFS, which is how I understand the context of religion, I feel few people have a choice but to be tolerant of others beliefs when it comes to ACTIONS, which I see as a seperate issue from religion, we only have to be as 'tolerant' as the constitution and the law declares,,,, mans law trumps beliefs or personal choice,,,,,, But again "WHAT IF THE RELIGION ITSELF PREACHES VIOLENCE AND INTOLERANCE?" Why MUST we tolerate it? Some ignorant Liberal Tree Hugging Peace Fag says so? Or some religious character preaching peace and love says so? (I KNOW someone is going to be offended by the term Peace Fag. TOUGH COOKIES! I am not disparaging homosexuals at all. I am however disparaging those who refuse to acknowledge the fact we MUST get violent at times to protect our own from harm. I personally PREFER peace but I am not so QUEER over it that I will try to ram peace down every throat like some of these JERKS who assume everything can be achieved through diplomacy! If words hurt you you have NO SPINE! But then again noting the debate style of others this should be more like a mirror mirror moment for them.) My issue is why we are forced to tolerate intolerance. Just because people are normally peaceful means nothing when the religion they observe preaches violence and hate. How many religions preach making war on others besides Islam? religion doesnt preach, people do religions arent exclusively peaceful or violent, people take from them what they will subjectively and personally we dont 'tolerate' a religion, we tolerate what people do and say,, and people will subjectively take from a 'religion' different things because there are many words in those books to be interpreted and as you yourself say 'If words hurt you you have NO SPINE!' its actions that are tolerable or intolerable, with or without religion,,, THAT IS SO NOT TRUE! You know that! I suppose the command to take up Holy War is not a command to act even if it is not coming from someone's lips? Seriously, This statement is a walking fallacy. Also you are trying to avoid the base question. It isn't individuals being placed under the microscope. It is religious values. You are aware for tolerance to work it must be reciprocal? You cannot have one side tolerant and the other intolerant. That is tilted and biased! Where is the equality here? but oddly, most people if commanded to jump off a cliff wont do it its the persons CHOICE of ACTION that is tolerable of intolerable are these rhetorical questions? IF not, can you be more specific about what 'sides' you are referring to? Again you are side stepping the issue. Tolerance for intolerant religious values and faith practices! |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE:
Yeah, the parents want justice. All the people Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton got whipped up want justice. This is just going to justify more racial animosity and there are two dirt bags who pretend to be civil leaders who are going to inflame this more with their racially charged rhetoric. This is going to get epically out of control again. And for what? Some ill perceived notion of justice? No, the parents expect legal revenge! I disagree. All they asked for was justice for their son. The protests and pressure has diminished greatly since the prosecutor pressed charges and set in motion a PROCESS By which their sons death could be taken more seriously and reviewed more extensively. JUST LIKE THE RODNEY KING CASE! |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Homeboy didn't make it to the brothel in time!
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
Am I being silly?
hey, I swore my children will never know the poverty I grew up in! And I mean it. But likewise i have yet to meet a woman who really gets me I guess. I want a family that will not fall apart to divorce, infidelity, financial strain. But conversely I am not having the role of sole breadwinner dumped on me either. Life these days is nothing like what mommy, daddy, and TV tried to teach me!
Edited by AndyBgood on Sun 04/29/12 03:39 PM
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
A question of tolerance...
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: few people are not 'tolerant' of religion or lack of religion people just have opinions about them we live in a country where there is no choice but to 'tolerate',,,basically So in essence if say I started a religion based on PURE hedonism, I mean an absolute desire of fulfilling personal self indulgences of any kind, and preach that in hedonism you can do no wrong. Now one of my faithful desires to murder and rape women, NO! Let's really up the stakes, likes to murder and rape little boys under 7 years old because their screaming makes him get off. Now lets say that because of religious tenant of hedonism that person has done nothing wrong and our church supports his actions. Now in normal society we would be aghast at someone doing something like this to someone. Worst and ultimately hypocritically that church would be branded a cult. Could you tolerate a religion where "Anything" goes? ESPECIALLY knowing that it could very well be you who something happens to next? How fine is the line between religion and cult? As far as I see it myself i see them both as very reflexive terms. It just matters on scale mostly. It is one thing to tolerate a person of Islamic heritage since all people can change. People are entitled to make mistakes as long as they don't harm one another BUT to blindly accept a faith who preaches the core values that Islam does? I am not a big fan of "Agape" or blind tolerance of anything. Would Christianity be less tolerable if it preached subjugation and murder? Lying cheating and stealing from anyone of any faith is wrong by Christian standards but does Islam draw the same moral lines? If you say yes I am going to dump a lot of passages from the Quaran on you that say otherwise. So are you confusing tolerance for a person or tolerance for a faith practice? re posted for clarity few people are not 'tolerant' of religion or lack of religion people just have opinions about them we live in a country where there is no choice but to 'tolerate',,,basically when talking BELIEFS, which is how I understand the context of religion, I feel few people have a choice but to be tolerant of others beliefs when it comes to ACTIONS, which I see as a seperate issue from religion, we only have to be as 'tolerant' as the constitution and the law declares,,,, mans law trumps beliefs or personal choice,,,,,, But again "WHAT IF THE RELIGION ITSELF PREACHES VIOLENCE AND INTOLERANCE?" Why MUST we tolerate it? Some ignorant Liberal Tree Hugging Peace Fag says so? Or some religious character preaching peace and love says so? (I KNOW someone is going to be offended by the term Peace Fag. TOUGH COOKIES! I am not disparaging homosexuals at all. I am however disparaging those who refuse to acknowledge the fact we MUST get violent at times to protect our own from harm. I personally PREFER peace but I am not so QUEER over it that I will try to ram peace down every throat like some of these JERKS who assume everything can be achieved through diplomacy! If words hurt you you have NO SPINE! But then again noting the debate style of others this should be more like a mirror mirror moment for them.) My issue is why we are forced to tolerate intolerance. Just because people are normally peaceful means nothing when the religion they observe preaches violence and hate. How many religions preach making war on others besides Islam? QUOTE: I am however disparaging those who refuse to acknowledge the fact we MUST get violent at times to protect our own from harm. That is absolutely not a fact. Violence entices more violence. Love entices more love. You can't fight fire with fire, only makes the fire larger. Really? WWII? We ended the war with japan unleashing a hellacious weapon of MASS destruction upon them to prevent an invasion! BUT WHO STARTED THAT AND HOW WAS IT FORCED TO END? Are we speaking German or Japanese right now? So let us Digress a little to Germany during 1937 when Hitler began his Blitzkrieg of Eastern Europe. The THEN League of Nations tried to appease Hitler as they had done with Kaiser Wilhelm during WWI and that led to two wars attempting Diplomacy. Granted this is a little condensed since many factors were at play but Diplomacy did not end violence. It took Violence to end violence. Grenada 1985 (? I might be wrong on the exact year) Cuba invades Grenada and we bitchhe slapped them back out. Want to talk about lashing out? Now to North Europe about I think it was 1000 AD. A contingent of Christian soldiers lays waste to a village of Norsemen in a holy war to exterminate Pagans from main land Europe. This in turn led to the Catholic Church getting attacked CONSTANTLY from vengeful Norsemen who actually forced England to sue for peace at a tremendous cost to themselves and left England with a bad taste in its mouth for the presence of Catholics. Now if you look at this from the Norse point of view and Historically THEY WERE ATTACKED FIRST AND THEY MADE WAR THAT LASTED LONG ENOUGH FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TO NEGOTIATE PEACE. That took a lot of wind out of the sails of the Catholic Church's current reign of blood. It wasn't until the end of the 1200s when the reign of the Norseman on the high seas really came to an end. Please don't try to throw over simplified rhetoric at me! History bears me out! PEACE IS ACHIEVED THROUGH SUPERIOR FIREPOWER AND THE WHEREWITHAL TO GET INTO A FIGHT IF PROVOKED ENOUGH. So how many bullies have you managed to talk out of beating on you? The only way I ended bullies reigns of terror on myself was to take them out MYSELF! Diplomacy fails too readily unless you can show you can and will beat the ever loving crap out of the opposition unless they come to the table like a smart monkey! A principle of life for Spartans was to show respect to visitors and to hear them out. They KNEW they were physically better than everyone else at the time and far better trained and equipped. If a visitor was foolish enough to talk smack they were forced to back their words. But historically if you were polite to a Spartan they were polite back even though they knew how to kill a man in several hundred ways with just their bare hands. Sparta did not fall to Greece by war. Politics took them out, well, they really were absorbed. Which brings up another act of violence to end violence. Somewhere around 600 BC King Xerces of Persia was invading southern Europe and managed to take most of South East Europe. A hand full of Greeks led by King Leonidis of Sparta held off a much superior invasion force of Persians long enough to allow the Greek fleet to attack Xerces support fleet causing his army to starve out. this followed a push by the rest of the Greek forces to chase the Persian Army from Greece. The famous battle led by Leonidis was the Battle of Thermopylae. It was known as the fight for Democracy. QUOTE: PEACE IS ACHIEVED THROUGH SUPERIOR FIREPOWER AND THE WHEREWITHAL TO GET INTO A FIGHT IF PROVOKED ENOUGH. Incorrect. War only leads to devistation. Nothing at all comes of war. War is nothing superior. Love is superior to all. And destroying someone else is not loving them. That is a little short sighted. In the Hindu beliefs destruction paves the way for creation. This also is a principle of the Yin and Yang where the good within the evil of an act of destruction is it allows room for new growth. many cultures view death and destruction not as evil but relative to the cycle of renewal. Like others I have debated before in these matters you seem to myopically approach everything from a Christian point of view exclusively. Is it impossible for Christians to see that good and evil are relative top one another? Good intentions can be twisted into evil acts. Another fact you overlook is humans being animals are prone to acts of instinct and violence to survive. I am pretty sure if I tossed you into a pit with a knife and let a vicious wolf loose in the pit you would fight to defend yourself. The threat of violence is sometimes not enough to deter bad people from doing bad things. And look at what good came of WWII. Mankind did grow and rebuild. But we still have yet to learn real love and compassion that transcends any book or faith practice. And likewise we must embrace the fact that the devil is not some fallen angel. Look in the mirror. THAT is the real devil. He is within us all and it is our duty to find balance with that knowledge. I will do bad things to defend myself. I will destroy to protect my own if necessary. I have a philosophy, I come in peace but I am prepared to make war. I will listen and try to understand but if what I hear is a threat I will take that as such. And also, Respect is Given where respect is granted. I can discuss and disagree with Christianity all day long with a Christian like yourself and we can agree to disagree and still be friends and not be out to kill each other over our pretext of god. But I have asked a lot of Islamics about their faith and asked them questions that had them answer "don't you dare question Islam like that." Like one question I have for them is why is it justifiable to lie to an infidel like myself when all I seek is the truth? Why is it acceptable to harm an infidel like myself if I have done no harm to Islam even though I refuse to be one with Islam? The Quaran commands to kill and destroy. Forget the Taliban destroying 3000 year old Buddhist statues in Afghanistan? Can you not see they preach destruction? or is it just me? |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
QUOTE: QUOTE: Cougar; fifty or over. Prefers guys over 15 years younger than themselves. Reflexive with a woman over fifty chasing 20 year olds. Now boys under 17? PEDOPHILE! Everyone has different definitions of cougars. That sounds close, though. Anyway, how can they be a cougar if they're going after you? Unless they're much older than 50?
so do I spell it out?
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
QUOTE: The retort is you now work for less and the jobs are still going to countries whose people will work for a bowl of rice. THAT IS WEAK! Weak on so many levels. I actually have to charge more for the overhead I have to eat. I have to charge more because I am being charged more all around. My work will never go overseas. There is no way in hell it can. people need their houses here fixed too. Let me name two more mediocrity unions: Screen Actor's Guild Screen Writer's Guild I know of executives who lament the need for fresh talent writing and acting. Ever look up the entry requirements to get into the SWG? Completely ridiculous. Nope, business would thrive here if there was not so much taxation on them and squeezing them dry (and I mean small and middle end businesses!). General Electric is now a global business but they made 7 TRILLION dollars in America and paid NO taxes thanks to "legal" loopholes. they put people to work here. So why is it so many small businesses are choking slowly and dying off? Everyone is trying to get into the wrong pockets! And what are Unions doing to keep their Jobs here? Well, I do know of one union that agreed to one volunteer day and pay reductions to keep their contingent of officers rather than let some go to keep their wages up. they knew less man power was suicidal! The Redondo Beach Police Officer's Union did what RARE few unions have done to keep work here! Teamsters do not negotiate. They just make demands! They are the classic slippery slope, "if you give a mouse a cookie he will want a glass of milk." And your response to this is??? |
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
Would you?
Nope, I like my women genetically female, not surgically!
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
Am I being silly?
I want to have a few child free years with a significant other before settling in and having kids. I want to have some fun with someone before having a ball and chain on my ankle for the next 18 or more years! Too many people jump in too soon and then the changes crush them. Better to prepare rather than go headlong into any long term commitment like that. How many people have complained having children wrecked their lives? More than a lot of people would like to admit. Some people just cannot handle the responsibility.
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
you're all old.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^What I just said!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
Topic:
you're all old.
|
|
AndyBgood Joined Thu 12/25/08 Posts: 10452 |
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/04/24/24-policies-that-republicans-supported-before-they-were-against-them/ Do some people HATE OBAMA more than they 'love america', does their support change MERELY because his name becomes attached to the issue somehow,,,? sure seems like to me,,, you make it out like the issues were on the table the day before Obama walked into office and the next day Republicans changed their minds.. Who says that they have to support the exact same things they supported in the 80s. Should democrats still have to support slavery? It must be wonderful to be a Liberal Journalist. Write anything that you like as the truth and the Liberal Sheeple believe it. Baa, baa, baa. The article is a bunch of liberal garbage. I wouldn't use it to wipe my ...
Im in disagreement about journalists writing what they want , including garbage. The idea to post this came after reading a thread about just that (Several threads, actually). You know? People posting somones opinion in youtube, or some editorial about how Terrible the POTUS is doing,,,,,? Did you mean the Im-potus?
judging by his fatherhood status,, probably not,,,lol I was thinking more of his presidential skills.
I dont know Osama gone Healthcar passed depression avoided ,,seems he has a pretty strong presence,,, Osama gone-- He fell into this. Left over intelligence from previous administration. Nuff said. Healthcar passed--Very unpopular and also unconstitutional as will be shown. Had to bribe some lawmakers to get it passed. Did not give time for it to be read as he said any of his bills would be. No transparencey in his office as he promised. depression avoided--As much as Tax Cheat, Ben Bernanke, lies about it. The recession is not over in spite of the massive trillion dollar so called "Stimulus" and the huge deficit that it created. If anything this will add years to it. Yes, seems he has a pretty strong presence,,,a negative one. technically, he 'fell' into most of the things he is attributed to healthcare wasnt unpopular when Romney did it there was plenty time to read it, they spent most of the first year on it there is more transparency, just not complete transparency I didnt say the recession was avoided, I said we avoided a 'DEPRESSION' And again you are not looking at the market trends and seeing how they compare to the 1920's and 1930's. They are strikingly similar. Also again if you factor in trade with the GDP as well as hidden factors like people who fell off of unemployment and other trends OBAMA AVOIDED NOTHING. And more transparency in Health Care? on what planet? Have you even seen how thick the bill itself is? Have you read it all? No one has! |
so do I spell it out?