It's pleasure and gratification.

IMO might as well say "I don't understand why there are so many McDonald's and an obesity epidemic in some countries. Eating is nothing without thinking of the long term effects of nutrition, genetics, cooking and life style."

Sometimes both.
Sometimes it seems like one or the other, but turns out to be neither.


Sometimes. Sometimes not.
Sometimes it seems mentally stimulating, but it's really just emotionally satisfying.


See?

My guesses would be:
1. That's all they thought they needed to steal off the internet to make a fake profile, or that was the only one available from the profile they took it from.

2. Since they were just dropping by a free site to see if there was anything going on they put up the bare minimum to immediately interact, and they could always add more later if they came back.

3. They know they're going to be asked "any mor pics?" no matter how many they post, now they just keep them in reserve.

4. System took them down. Pics take up a lot of space when you're dealing with thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions of people. Especially if they violate TOS.

5. Is their face and body shape relatively clear? Then why is more than 1 necessary.

For me, generally a turn off.
But not as much as facial hair.

Under arm hair isn't a turn off to the extent where I'd be "welllll, she's perfect in every other way, but that under arm hair...I'm not going to date her," or, "I gotta divorce her."

Facial hair on the other hand? Depends on what Selleck stage she's at.

To some, yes, to others, no.
I don't believe it's either available or unavailable.


Relationships aren't one size fits all, or all follow the same path.
Just depends on the change.

Not only that, but a relationship means there are two people working together to handle the changes that "relationship" brings.

It's not just you doing it by yourself for them or "the relationship."

There's a reason and purpose for communication in a relationship.

Kind of a vague question.
But really, yes, anything that affects the individual, their perspective, their personality, their choices and decisions, is going to "matter" to some degree when it comes to "love issues."

At best you're going to have it in a different position in the hierarchy of importance.
And that hierarchy can change.

Switch the words around.

Search for a girl.
Determine if she's "good."
Try to form relationship.

Or are you asking "How do I treat this like Amazon where I just click in exactly what I want into the search bar and I get a bunch of options where I can compare price and reviews, and when I find what I want I can just click it and have it given to me, guaranteed?"
That you can't really do.
...Unless you have a lot of money.
Then it's "seeking arrangements" or "sugarbabies" I think.

If you plan to ever meet each other, or go cam to cam, yes. Lots of rules. Mostly to avoid underage stuff.

If you never plan to meet in real life, and it's all text/IM, maybe.
Kinda depends on if you're paying by the minute or not.
Other than that, anything goes.
You could be talking to another guy with a stolen picture, or even the monkey at the zoo they taught sign language and typing skills to.
Go bananas.

This isn't a statement, it's a question.


It's true if you want it to be, it's false if you want it to be.
It's not a universal social law noting anything significant.

Why? Did they say something about me? What'd they say?!
...Can you pass them a note for me in study hall?

Good thing dating websites don't ask for specific weight. Or original hair color.
You'd never find a date.

Awesome!
Does it really have to be female?

I mean I could go lift some photos off Facebook of some random girl, and type in a higher pitch voice, will that work?

Sure:
1. Not all "girls" are the same.
2. Not all girls are looking for "sincere lovers."
3. Believing oneself to be a "sincere lover" doesn't guarantee mutual attraction.
4. "Girls" look for/at more than sincerity (e.g. job, distance, social status, height, humor, trustworthiness, race, gregariousness).
5. A lot of people that classify themselves as "sincere lovers" (i.e. "serious?") don't come across as being truthful, they're simply using "sincere lover" as a ploy.
6. Some "sincere lovers" are impatient and want immediate reciprocal interest and don't give "girls" adequate time to actually respond. Some girls would show interest, but they're going to do it when they feel like it, regardless of when the "sincere lover" wants them to.
7. Some "sincere lovers" don't understand the website they're using and end up sending emails to profiles that haven't been signed into for months to years.

Pick whichever one makes you feel the least unhappy.

Sure. Why not?


Not as excited with the "by accident" part, but I'd still do it.
More than likely I'd end up in a government dungeon experimented on to "accident." I wouldn't like that.
I prefer the truly immortal (unable to die no matter what) or only capable of dying by my own willful choice and directed action.


If I was the only one that could do it, or was offered that choice, yes.
If it was a technology that was offered to everyone (or anyone else at all), like an OTC pill, then probably not.

Why would I like to live forever? I like life and living.

Can't really do anything all that kinky with just those three things, not without the bridle.
Then you have options.
Pages 15, 26, 634-735, and the entire appendix B, of the updated world Kama Sutra, only available to porn stars and politicians.

Doesn't really matter.

Can "you" be "friends" with the opposite sex?
If yes, then look to date those with similar beliefs.
If no, then look to date those with similar beliefs.
If you can be persuaded to change your belief, look for someone that can persuade you by who they are and how they live it.

You'll save a lot of time, energy, stress, and frustration if you avoid trying to convince someone to get rid of a relationship or value/moral belief for you.


Assuming there is mutual commitment, if one partner is out there making brand new "just friends" and then spending more and more time with them rather than their partner (assuming by choice rather than circumstance e.g. new job demanding more of a partners time leaving the other partner alone more often), that's an entirely different issue.

Depends on the guy.
Depends on a lot of things.
You don't even define "a guy." Is that specific, or general?

I mean, do you have some kind of "ideal guy" archetype in your head that you think exists somewhere on earth and you're asking for tips on telepathy and remote viewing?

Are you talking about some guy you work with, or go to school with, that you talk to on a regular basis, but you want him to start seeing you as a potential romantic partner?

Are you talking to some guy on the internet and it's just been months of chatting and you want him to ask you to meet for a romantic date?

Are you referring to the online dating process and you keep stalking a specific guys profile hoping he'll get the "viewed me" hint and start emailing you?

Are you just wondering how to word/setup your profile to be more "attractive" or whatever to get local (or whatever area you're interested in) guys to email you?

Yes and no.
Online forum is not offline day to day, face to face living.
The situation/conditions dictate a lot.


I didn't think that was necessary or even desired.
I would think that would only really matter if "on the internet" is pretty much your entire reason for existing and/or your only means of social interaction/support.

Other than that, IMO, the internet only facilitates your ability/desire to develop a shallow avatar to avoid having a deeper personality.


Yes and no.
If someone came to my house and posted "why don't older women like younger men? Isn't age just a number?" on my door, I would take it down and while eating my morning cereal sit there and come up with something to say off the top of my head, write it down, then throw the post away, and think about or do something else until I was done with my cereal.

Otherwise, it would be a conversation, and those have a tendency to be far more interactive and fluid.

For some, yes, for others, no. .
For pretty much everyone it's remembered inaccurately.


Not sure how in depth you want that answer.
You want a biological explanation regarding the hippocampus, puberty, and emotional development?

You want a sociological explanation regarding emotional group formation and relevance in conditioning and conformity?

You want some kind of personal identity explanation of subjective significance of a relationship?

When you have a song playing in your head that you can't seem to get out of there, why do you think it's that song?
Do you want a flippant answer? Do you want some kind of emotional stroking? Or do you want a TED talk?

Probably my stuffed tiger after I saw mommy kissing daddy.


My memory's fuzzy.