Topic: Temple in Israel........
AlpineRocks's photo
Wed 01/17/07 06:14 PM
I just watched a documentery and new info has been discovered the temple
is not located where they thought it was which has been preventing them
from rebuilding it (the rock) is not the temple it was actually located
about a mile to the East which is vacant land and preperations are being
made to begin the rebuilding of the temple. This means the anticrist is
fixing to reign until he is destroyed by Christ, that is the Proficy of
the rebuilding of the temple.

heatherrae's photo
Wed 01/17/07 06:16 PM
yup, somebody's been doin his homework.

FedMan's photo
Wed 01/17/07 07:37 PM
well according to all those that don't believe then it's not gonna
happen.....how can a book written by men be truthful? well I believe it
and for all those that don't, follow the predictions in the
bible.............all of this coincidence?

MikeMontana's photo
Thu 01/18/07 08:02 PM
That presumes that "Revelation" is a future event. Many scholars,
christian scholars, contend that Revelation has come and gone. Thousands
of years ago at that.

Martin Luther, the leader of the protestant reformation, which became
the fundamental root to any christian who isnt catholic, felt this way.
he lobbied to have it dropped from the new testament since it was
clearly a message of hope directed at the the local christians being
persecuted.

The book ("Revelation") is in coded figurative talk from cover to cover.
It was written by John while in a hunger-induced trance on Patmos Island
(95ad), and he talks about the famous AntiChrist. Since the 1200s this
text has been used to talk about a future event.

But, look at John's own words, in his other texts (namely John 1, 2, and
3 - very short). He makes the point that the "antichrist is ALREADY
come".

So, to take the figurative texts as a commentary on the years 1946 -
2007 seems like trying to back fit an elephant into a volvo.

FedMan's photo
Thu 01/18/07 08:35 PM
if revelation had come to pass already we would not be here having this
conversation

PublicAnimalNo9's photo
Thu 01/18/07 08:45 PM
One question. If John states in his Book that the antichrist is already
come, why would he not say WHO it was???

Ghostrecon's photo
Fri 01/19/07 08:17 PM
Because the AntiChrist was Nero back then. That's why they used the code
666.

Now the new AntiChrist is the current Pope Benedict.

Here's proof.

http://www.monkey.net/archives/PopeBenedictXVI.jpg

booboo's photo
Mon 02/05/07 12:53 PM
ok guys heres my take on the anti-christ#1 john was talking about the
spirit of anti christ meaning against christ the bodliy one will be
in the flesh in the 7 yr tribulation... we will not know who he is until
the church is removed which is now preventing him from coming into
power,,,the holy spirit....next 1 world govt christians will be
beheaded for their faith middleeast will be in there with russia to
destroy ISREAL anti c will be destroyed by the second coming of the
real christ at ARRMA GENNINsorr y about spelling but u get the point

booboo's photo
Mon 02/05/07 12:57 PM
p. s. read Ezeakle 38 & 39 daniel 8 &9 also revelation 7 thru 21
booboo