Will Obozo ever release the 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 report as promised to the families of the victims?

Doubtful..... but why?

Like the JFK assassination, unsolved, led and investigated by "official" government commissions... are they really that enept with all the BILLIONS we spend on spying and security apparatuses?

New FBI Tactic Hints at Big DC Cover-up of Saudi 9/11 Funding

http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/04/02/new-fbi-tactic-hints-at-big-dc-cover-up-of-saudi-911-funding/

I strongly disapprove of this kind of post. For one thing, by insisting on using an insult name for your target of prejudice, the poster makes it 100% clear that nothing which they have to say can be trusted to have any factual basis.

For another, it means that from a purely logical standpoint, the poster has actually said, absolutely nothing. Because the fake person they are fussing about, exists only in their imagination.

huh

apparently he knows more than everyone else...

Ill take a stab at answering that "huh"...and Im assuming there should be a question mark after it, but, I digress.....The poster that "strongly disapproved" probably saw the term "obozo" and figured the OPs mind was already made up and saw no point in participating in a seemingly healthy debate. Probably because one cant be had with folks using descriptions like said "obozo", "obummer", ....lets see...."obamanation" is another, as is "democrap". And, on the other end of the spectrum, "Repulsion" for Republican.....or my favorite...."Its Bush's fault".

Thats all just speculation though. That would be my bet anyway.

i'm guessing he's a dimocrat...they like to tell others what to think and not have opinions anyway, so it seems to fit...

It doesn't take much research to learn that Saudi oil money and money from most, if not all, of the other Arab oil states have channeled their way into the hands of terrorist organizations for decades. It is a FACT that they really don't want to talk about. Now, it is coming back to bite them.


Did the Saudis fund 9/11? Probably not directly or officially but probably indirectly at least in part.

Awww come on Moe lol.....you were almost there....say it..."Democrat"....it wont kill ya....and youll look more intelligent also. And any substantial argument you have will carry more weight.

lol, it's not worth arguing about, to me... i'm not trying to change anyones mind, just saying whats on mine...

I understand...no worries my friend. But someday, we (all of us that oppose each other) better figure out a way to converse with real facts, not partisan website "facts" and kindergarten-esque name affiliations.
Oh well, time will tell....One day, we all may be able to drive to Hawaii

Kinda like anyone that disagrees with Obama's policies are a racist.

You have to be a racist because he is doing such a great job on 100% of the issues how could anyone take umbrage with his policies and world view...

HAH!

Don't you love it when they argue semantics, questioning a character instead of the issues?

8 fingers all pointing different directions. Distraction, not discourse.....arthritic logic

A point in any direction is better than no point at all.....The Liberal way

It's what liberals do to feign logic

The New York Post Reports - FBI is Covering Up Saudi Links to 9/11 Attack

Former Democratic Sen. Bob Graham maintains the FBI is covering up a Saudi support cell in Sarasota for the hijackers

http://nypost.com/2015/04/12/saudi-role-in-911-being-whitewashed-by-fbi/

by Michael Krieger April 14, 2015

Former Democratic Sen. Bob Graham, who in 2002 chaired the congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11, maintains the FBI is covering up a Saudi support cell in Sarasota for the hijackers. He says the al-Hijjis' "urgent" pre-9/11 exit suggests "someone may have tipped them off" about the coming attacks.

Graham has been working with a 14-member group in Congress to urge President Obama to declassify 28 pages of the final report of his inquiry which were originally redacted, wholesale, by President George W. Bush.

"The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier," he said, adding, "I am speaking of the kingdom, or government, of Saudi Arabia, not just wealthy individual Saudi donors."

Sources who have read the censored Saudi section say it cites CIA and FBI case files that directly implicate officials of the Saudi Embassy in Washington and its consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks - which, if true, would make 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war by a foreign government.

Just 15 days before the 9/11 attacks, a well-connected Saudi family suddenly abandoned their luxury home in Sarasota, Fla., leaving behind jewelry, clothes, opulent furniture, a driveway full of cars including a brand new Chrysler PT Cruiser and even a refrigerator full of food.

About the only thing not left behind was a forwarding address. The occupants simply vanished without notifying their neighbors, realtor or even mail carrier.

Perfectly normal, particularly when you combine it with the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens.
The 3,300-square-foot home on Escondito Circle belonged to Esam Ghazzawi, a Saudi adviser to the nephew of then-King Fahd. But at the time, it was occupied by his daughter and son-in-law, who beat a hasty retreat back to Saudi Arabia just two weeks before the attacks after nearly a six-year stay here.

Neighbors took note of the troubling coincidence and called the FBI, which opened an investigation that led to the startling discovery that at least one "family member" trained at the same flight school as some of the 9/11 hijackers in nearby Venice, Fla.

The Saudi-9/11 connection in Florida was no small part of the overall 9/11 investigation. Yet it was never shared with Congress. Nor was it mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.

The review panel highlighted one local FBI report generated from the investigation that said Abdulaziz and Anoud al-Hijji, the prominent Saudi couple who "fled" their home, had "many connections" to "individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001."

The panel's report also doesn't explain why visitor security logs for the gated Sarasota community and photos of license tags matched vehicles driven by the hijackers, including 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta.

Graham has been working with a 14-member group in Congress to urge President Obama to declassify 28 pages of the final report of his inquiry which were originally redacted, wholesale, by President George W. Bush.

"The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier," he said, adding, "I am speaking of the kingdom, or government, of Saudi Arabia, not just wealthy individual Saudi donors."

Sources who have read the censored Saudi section say it cites CIA and FBI case files that directly implicate officials of the Saudi Embassy in Washington and its consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks - which, if true, would make 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war by a foreign government. The section allegedly identifies high-level Saudi officials and intelligence agents by name, and details their financial transactions and other dealings with the San Diego hijackers. It zeroes in on the Islamic Affairs Department of the Saudi Embassy, among other Saudi entities.

thats why it's not worth arguing about... same as trying to talk with liberals about 911, just a big circle that always goes back to "dumbazz"...