Topic: Iran Agreement Contained a Troubling Secret Document
Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 07/21/16 02:59 PM

The Iran Agreement Contained a Troubling Secret Document

In 14 years the mullahs will have a new, advanced, state-of-the-art Nuke program

Mohammed Zarif, the U.S.-educated foreign minister of Iran, has confirmed our worst fears. There is a secret document after all.

The nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1, “the nuke deal”, as it is commonly referred to in the West had a secret component.

Confirmation of the secret document came by way of Fars, Iran’s semi-official news agency. The truth of the document was revealed by Zarif to raise the psyche of the Iranian people. Zarif is of the belief that the nuclear project is part and parcel of Iranian pride and the negotiators, which he proudly led, deliberately added several elements to the document insure that Iran retains control of their own nuclear destiny.

http://observer.com/2016/07/the-iran-agreement-contained-a-troubling-secret-document/

Conrad_73's photo
Thu 07/21/16 03:22 PM
Obama will go down in History as the POTUS who gave Nuclear Weapons to Iran!

mightymoe's photo
Thu 07/21/16 05:58 PM

Obama will go down in History as the POTUS who gave Nuclear Weapons to Iran!


not really, they will just blame the republicans for it...

Conrad_73's photo
Fri 07/22/16 03:14 AM


Obama will go down in History as the POTUS who gave Nuclear Weapons to Iran!


not really, they will just blame the republicans for it...

yep,especially GWB!laugh

Serchin4MyRedWine's photo
Fri 07/22/16 10:39 AM
This is nothing new. The Republicans (and some Dems) whole argument against this agreement was that after 15 years it recognizes Iran as a legitimate nuclear power able to legitimately make nuclear weapons.
I guess the "press" is finally reporting on it because it is too late to stop the dealfrown

IgorFrankensteen's photo
Sat 07/23/16 06:06 AM
This "troubling secret document" hasn't been clarified as to it's exact contents yet. Besides which, there is no report yet, specifically saying that it entirely undermines the nuclear agreement itself.

So far,, this is yet another example of someone on ONE side of an issue, finding out a tiny amount about it which wasn't overtly known before (by the way, EVERY international agreement of any kind, has secret documents within it, no matter what you may want to believe, and no matter how much you may think that the agreement was a good one), and then trumpeting the existence of such a document, as proof of duplicity, even though they don't actually have real proof of said duplicity at all.