Topic: Crimes Without Punishment
madisonman's photo
Tue 02/05/08 12:53 PM
This weekend, thanks to Arianna Huffington, I had the opportunity to attend a screening of No End in Sight, Charles Ferguson’s brilliant documentary about the Iraq war, the buildup, the ***k-up and the slide into chaos. See it now at whatever theatre has the guts to show it. Don’t wait until it comes to Netflix because this is one film that must be seen in a theatre with a full sized theatre screen, not on a television set, no matter how large the set. This isn’t about watching football, it’s about watching history, really bad, tragic history. Only in the theatre will you see the true dimensions of the horror and the chaos that Bush brought down on the Iraqi people, and the criminal ignorance of the Bush administration that brought us to where we are today. It’s Halloween – a horror film in the shape of a fine documentary, one that lets events do the talking, the very best way to review history.

There is a point where incompetence and willed ignorance, infused with constant lying, becomes a criminal act. And this has happened to the Bush administration, where their mistakes have become crimes. This film is a stunning indictment of our President and his cohorts and the hell that they brought down on the Iraqi people, and its consequences for all Americans, beyond the insurgency — the hatred that makes us so vulnerable today from any terrorists that our president created. It is hard to look at this film and not believe that Bush was a mole, a secret agent of Al Qaeda, for nothing those terrorist criminals might have done could have wreaked such havoc on the world and America as the acts of George Bush and company.

Just today the news reported the accidental killing of a group of adult Iraqis and a small child by our soldiers who were seeking insurgents and killed the innocents in error. Each of these incidents adds to the crimes that this administration has brought to the world, and the hatred for America. I love this country, and it hurts me and many like me to discover that we are regarded as enemies of peace. Here is the big questions raised in my mind. Will these crimes go unpunished? Will an Obama or a Hillary, if elected, advise us that we must look ahead, not backwards to the recent past? I long for the bad-old days, the really bad old days when a Napolean was exiled to Elba and St. Helena to spend his last days in exile after being responsible for the deaths of millions, cut off from the company of mankind. Chances are Bush will return to Crawford, start work on his library, and attempt to revise history so that his crimes are made to appear bold actions, not the murderously stupid, irresponsible acts that they were. If ever there was an argument for keeping our base at Guantanamo it would be that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz, together with Condoleeza Rice would be sent there into permanent exile. This won’t happen, of course, but one can dream.

In every other aspect of life we seek justice and accountability, but in the case of the rogue Bush government, many feel that getting these bozos out of Washington this year will be enough. Not me and many like me. If it’s not actually murder they committed, it is most assuredly manslaughter (particularly in the case of Rumsfeld who told our soldiers who complained of being sent into battle with Humvees lacking armor-plate that you go to battle with the army you have, smiling at his own wit, surrounded by the smug, the dishonest, and the dishonorable, of which he was and is a charter member.

No matter who gets elected (and this leaves out Uncle Daffy, Mr. Surge McCain) there will be great difficulties in extricating ourselves from Iraq. We cannot turn our backs on those Iraqis who helped us or those who fled into exile and dire poverty. But a band-aid of alms for the Iraqi poor won’t cut it, not after leaving guns about for the insurgency, and tossing them to the mercy of their old enemy Iran. There is no way that we can leave Iraq in the short period of time proposed by Obama or Hillary with any moral authority, and someone should tell the truth to the American people about our obligation to the Iraqis. First, however, we must be assured that the Congress investigates the various crimes of the Bush administration. Henry Waxman may help there by investigating the corruption of those unbid contracts of Blackwater, and it may be such corruption — like the tax conviction of Al Capone that brought him down, that brings down Cheney and others — but Waxman lacks the support of too many cautious Democratic representatives who want to push the Bush years out of sight.

Nancy Pelosi believed that she was making a smart tactical move by refusing to consider an impeachment of Bush, but it was a great mistake because without clearing the rubble and assigning blame where it belongs, we leave behind us a history of crimes without punishment, a blow to any sane notion of justice. And far worse, this country cannot truly move ahead without a full hearing and an assignment of blame for this disastrous war. Call me vindictive. I can live with that. But I can’t live with the idea that all these villains, and that’s what they are, will walk away into their new lives in academia, business, or just their corrupt and comfortable billionaire-dom, and pay nothing but in reputation for their crimes. Government leaders went to prison for far less in the Teapot Dome scandal of the ’20s, and for Watergate in the ’70s. The crimes of the Bush administration dwarf any committed by their predecessors. See No End in Sight, and I believe that you will agree.

Sherman Yellen is a screenwriter, playwright, and lyricist.

Copyright © 2008 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/05/6850/

no photo
Tue 02/05/08 12:55 PM
huffington was a slum lord. get a life dude

itsmetina's photo
Tue 02/05/08 12:57 PM
the military makes mistakes they didnt kill innocent people on purpose.saddam was killing for the thrill of it letting his sons do as they please.

docburneraz's photo
Tue 02/05/08 01:00 PM
Einstein said: Nationalism is the product of adolescent minds. Didnt he marry his cousin?laugh

KennethP5206's photo
Tue 02/05/08 01:08 PM
Your Social Security...
a little history lesson on what's what.

Our Social Security...

Franklin Roosevelt , a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA ) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent "Trust Fund" rather than into the General Operating Fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other government program, and...

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month --

and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal Government to "put away" -- you may be interested in the following:

-------------------------------------------------------------

Q : Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust Fund" and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically Controlled House and Senate.

---------------------
-----------------------------------------------

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US.

------------------------------------------------------
-------------

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is, uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.




madisonman's photo
Tue 02/05/08 01:22 PM

the military makes mistakes they didnt kill innocent people on purpose.saddam was killing for the thrill of it letting his sons do as they please.
and america supported him all through the worst of his attrocities untill it became expediant to drag out all that old news of the gassing of the Kurds in "88 and all the other horrible things he did without america raising a whimper untill it was time to take him down.

itsmetina's photo
Tue 02/05/08 01:31 PM
we can only deal with the here and now