Community > Posts By > SurreyBirdMan

 
SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 11:12 AM
Grrr I can't get the smileys to work yet.

I tried to send you a smile.

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 11:11 AM
You are very welcome my dear and again welcome.
http://www.justsayhi.com/topic/reply/14935#
Smile

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 11:07 AM
oh Sheena, how I wish you would here when I read your post.
I laughed so hard I fell out of my chair.

http://www.justsayhi.com/topic/reply/14937#
Smile

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 10:59 AM
I did just a search and much to my surprise within 5 miles of me there
is only one female between the ages of 40 and 55.

What do you think my chances are of finding love close to were I live in
here...LMAO... it don't look too good does it?

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 10:51 AM
I hope everyone will reach out with a warm welcome to a dear net friend
of mine SlendorCat.

If ever there was a member I'd want to write a testimonial for it would
be SlendorCat, a lady of integrity with a wonderful sence of humour.

So glad to see you here SlendorCat.
Welcome darling to where it's at.

as always your friend and a fan of yours

Mel

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 10:01 AM
I don't view these topics as being ego supporting but more the result of
a lack of knowledge of the relationship between science and religeon.

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 09:57 AM
It's not unusual for the Bible to be misconstrued by alot of people.

When we read in the Bible that a person begat a person one or two
generations may have passed. An example to explain this is let's say
John begat Bob.

John had a son named Jeremy and Jeremy a son named Johan, Johan had a
son named Bob.

John begat through his sons and his son begat Bob. Lets' shorten this
remembering the Bible was written a thousands years after the fact, if
they were facts. John begat Bob. The intermediates having been people
that were not of great importance to relay the story have been emmited
for simplicity sake, a common practise when writting.

For incest to be a dicriminationg factor used to disqualify the Bible
the notion of using this inferrence has inherit holes in it's
hypothesis. In devoping an understanding of this we must first develop
an understanding of the word faith when used in reference to a beoief in
the Bible and religeon.

Faith is a belief in something that may or may not be based on a truth.
Much of the power of religeon is based on faith and yet this faith
remains to be a belief in something that may or may not be proven to be
true. People that beief in Religeon have also historically oppossed
science as in science a proof has to arrived at before a truth is known.
In science there may be some lack of evidence that the Bible is based
on truths. In religeon science can be challenged because faith is being
challenged against known truths. People has historically taken opposite
sides of the fence when these two topics are brought together. Using
incest as an example as a critic's choice to disqualify the Bible is an
event that has happened repeatedly over and over again in history. How
does science include religeon and religeon include science one might ask
when discussing the the evolution of man and the teachings of the Bible.
In the Bible it is taught incest is wrong and in science we learn that
all people originally came one source millions of years ago in Africa.
It was through a process of natural selection and thousands of years of
mutations and the patterns of inheritance that developed modern man.
Incest implies a procreation took place between two closely related
individuals. Father and daughter matings, mother and son matings,
brother and sister matings are exampes of incest. The realtionship
between the individuals is one of very close blood relationship. What
this means is the gene pool is very much like the other individual.
Sometimes when the gene pool has many common genes on both sides of the
chromosome chain it can result in recessive genes surfacing and without
a dominant gene being present an adverse or life threatening result
appears in the offsring. In science and in religeon incest is
discouraged unless one has avst knoeldge of how to manipulate he gene
through a process of selective breeding practises. All purebred animals,
birds fish etc. were developed using this method and often inbreeding
was resorted to develop a standard of perfection of variety within a
species. The mating of brotehrto sister has been used to narrow an gene
pool and type fix the characteristcs of an individual in it's offspring.
The question I think you asking is if incest is wrong then how could the
human race have developed to be what it is if
there was no incest at all during the evolution of man. This leads us
back to science and how science and religeon are joined at the hip.

Incest is when two closely related individuals mate and procreate. If
the individuals have enough distance in the relation to each other which
results in a wide enough gene pool that hybrid vigor is maintained then
the possibility of recessive genes surfacing is kept to reasonable
level. In science and in religeon incest is discouraged because as man
evolved it was learned through an observation of the results recessive
genes could come to the surface and be expressed in a negative way. The
Bible was written as a guide for living and it did not have the room to
include science. If it included science and scientfic explanations the
Bible would still be in a process of being written. This resulted in the
Bible appearing to have holes only because it does not go into complete
details about who begat who and how.

Sorry for long length of this. Any indepth explanation takes time and
many words...ha ha until edited. Bob begat Bob..right?
The edited version.




SurreyBirdMan's photo
Sun 03/11/07 08:55 AM
waves to Dianne.."Hi Sugar, nice to see you here."








SurreyBirdMan's photo
Tue 02/27/07 09:19 PM
Iv'e had these contacts when on other sites and one way that kills them
is to tell the girl I'd love to visit Russia.

Then I ask her for financial assistance so I can get there.

Needless the say they don't write again.

Dam..no holiday for me it seems.

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Tue 02/27/07 09:08 PM
WOW... thank you all of you for the warm welcome.

I'm looking forward to having a good time here.

Mel,

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Tue 02/27/07 08:03 AM
The way I see these site is the chance of meeting someone special in
here is againstyou soooo..why not come just to make some friends and say
hi to other people. When I see a photo it helps me visualize who I am
talking to..I like that. :)

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Tue 02/27/07 07:33 AM
Hi Verb and thank you. I like you, am sick of that other site we used to
have fun at. This seems to be refreshing.

SurreyBirdMan's photo
Tue 02/27/07 07:19 AM
Hi Verb, as you can see I have also posted my photo. I to believe that
honsety is the best policy.