|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Weight Loss
If you are doing a low carb diet, it's important to keep your electrolytes up. To do this, I eat lots of Morton's Lite Salt. It's half sodium and half potassium and iodized. I also drink about a gallon of water a day from my Brita pitcher. There are chemicals in tap water (to purify or fortify it) that can attach to the iodine receptors in the thyroid, preventing your thyroid from behaving correctly. You can speed up your weight loss a bit by just making sure you drink enough clean water and eat enough iodized salt. It's interesting that people are told to cut back on their salt when they diet, as table salt is the best source of iodine in the average American's diet. If you up your water intake and lower your salt intake, you are going to have headaches, leg pains and generally feel unwell.
|
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: My train of thought derailed....no survivors. I read the bold part in Andre the giants voice. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Who's Your Hero and Why?
QUOTE: perhaps you failed to read and research the footnotes/documentation about his direct and indirect involvement. However, let us just agree to disagree. This is a thread about Heros not economics. It would not be appropriate to attack someone's else's hero like they did with Marion "John" Wayne. How can anyone not like John Wayne? |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Who's Your Hero and Why?
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Anyone who has the courage and convictions to be the guy on the far left. Being on the far left doesn't require "courage and convictions" so much as it requires that you be able to ignore human nature, consider yourself superior to the majority of people, be historically illiterate and most importantly, desire to control other people's lives. I beg to differ: For example, Milton Friedman's theories work mainly on paper and in small limited areas, however, the reason they do not work in real life large scale is his total lack of factoring in human nature as a variable. I think Naomi Wolfe has a good book on this, outlining the history of his efforts. For example, after Tianamen Square massacre, He stated I hope they don't blame this on me too. It is similar to when I did my ex's homework for being an Activities Director- she was studying Maslow. Maslow is most applicable in the business setting, but he is taught almost everywhere. Milton Friedman was a world renowned economist, Naomi Wolfe is most famous for writing a book trying to discredit Milton Friedman. Free market capitalist has worked at increasing the wealth of the common many every where it has been applied. From USA to China. You have read too much Wolfe and not enough history. Silly! Then why did he need dictators and kill squads in South America to implement his theories. The rich got richer- more wealth and the poor got poorer. American corporations are making more money than ever but unemployment is still high. State of PA's revenues are up, but they just cut another 20% out of the budget. Even Nixon was a Keyesian. Your brain has been rotted by Naomi's invective. Milton Friedman was invited to Chile 2 years after the coup. While there, he gave several speeches, including one that was pointing out the problems with military governments (like Pinochet's). He met with Pinochet and gave him a letter outlining Chile's worst economic problems. That was the sum total of his involvement. Naomi Wolfe disagrees with his well though out economic policies, so she straw mans and outright lies about his activities. It's shameful and you have fallen for it. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Who's Your Hero and Why?
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Anyone who has the courage and convictions to be the guy on the far left. Being on the far left doesn't require "courage and convictions" so much as it requires that you be able to ignore human nature, consider yourself superior to the majority of people, be historically illiterate and most importantly, desire to control other people's lives. I beg to differ: For example, Milton Friedman's theories work mainly on paper and in small limited areas, however, the reason they do not work in real life large scale is his total lack of factoring in human nature as a variable. I think Naomi Wolfe has a good book on this, outlining the history of his efforts. For example, after Tianamen Square massacre, He stated I hope they don't blame this on me too. It is similar to when I did my ex's homework for being an Activities Director- she was studying Maslow. Maslow is most applicable in the business setting, but he is taught almost everywhere. Milton Friedman was a world renowned economist, Naomi Wolfe is most famous for writing a book trying to discredit Milton Friedman. Free market capitalist has worked at increasing the wealth of the common many every where it has been applied. From USA to China. You have read too much Wolfe and not enough history. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Love a good fight and make up
Wonder if Roddy Piper is the same Rowdy Roddy Piper from WWF fame. Looks a bit young though. That's him...the one and the same. This movie (They Live) was made in 1988... the height of his career in WWE. Fun movie, by the way. I love Roddy's other flick Hell Comes To Frogtown- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKwteCwCSMw Cap just told me he hasn't seen that one yet!!! Now I have to find it..
Just avoid the sequel that Roddy didn't return for. You mean the one with the rocketeers?
I love the first one though. Up All Night introduced me to it. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: QUOTE: An interesting article that came out today. Low-carb diet burns the most calories in small study QUOTE: Findings, published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association: Participants burned about 300 calories more a day on a low-carb diet than they did on a low-fat diet. "That's the amount you'd burn off in an hour of moderate intensity physical activity without lifting a finger," says senior author David Ludwig, director of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston Children's Hospital.
Thanks :) I don't like the picture, but it's what I look like now, so I put it up. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: Does the expression begging the question mean anything to you? How about ad hominem? Show me how my post is begging the question or an ad himinem. Now you'll cry foul, because I asked you to do the impossible.
He probably doesn't know what that means himself. It just makes him sound like he knows something.
More likely, those phrases mean different things on Melmac. He probably just complimented me and told me that I'm awesome and his hero. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
An interesting article that came out today.
Low-carb diet burns the most calories in small study QUOTE: Findings, published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association: Participants burned about 300 calories more a day on a low-carb diet than they did on a low-fat diet. "That's the amount you'd burn off in an hour of moderate intensity physical activity without lifting a finger," says senior author David Ludwig, director of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston Children's Hospital.
Edited by Spidercmb on Wed 06/27/12 07:29 AM
|
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: Does the expression begging the question mean anything to you? How about ad hominem? Show me how my post is begging the question or an ad himinem. Now you'll cry foul, because I asked you to do the impossible.
|
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: Factcheck.org debunked the claim against Snopes.com that is featured in the OP. As it turns out, the operators of Snopes.com are politically neutral, which means that people with Obama Derangement Syndrome are going to accuse Snopes of liberal bias because Snopes doesn't support anti-Obama stories that are false. Back when George W. Bush was President of the USA, Snopes was accused of conservative bias because the website didn't support anti-Bush stories that were false. And we'll take their word for it, because all they have riding on it is their business. If they came right out and admitted to bias, they would lose a large chunk of their visits per month. And Factcheck is just as left leaning, so why would it surprise anyone that they defend Snopes? I will still use Snopes, I just know that they won't fact check anything that will hurt democrats. It doesn't matter, because most of the worst stuff they do is done in print or on video. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
George Zimmerman Passed Police Lie Detector Test Day After Trayvon Martin Killing
QUOTE: Along with questions about whether his first name was George and if it was Monday, Zimmerman was asked, “Did you confront the guy you shot?’ He answered, “No.” He was also asked, “Were you in fear for your life, when you shot the guy.” Zimmerman replied, “Yes.” Let me guess...no minds were changed with this information, right? It's time to face facts, every white man with a guy should be in prison.
Edited by Spidercmb on Tue 06/26/12 01:14 PM
|
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
QUOTE: Well, that's the thing. Snopes does cite their sources, allowing you to go search on your own to see if they've been correct. It would be different if they just posted things without a source (such as the OP ).
The article that the OP posted isn't about how their articles are biased, it's about the fact that Snopes does not fact check anything that is negative about Obama and true. So if a Republican says something negative that isn't true about Obama, they bust it, if a Republican says something negative about Obama that is true, they ignore it. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
What's all this "Don't trust YouTube" and "Provide a non-biased source" crap?
If the video on YouTube is Barack Obama saying something (Like when he promised that the Healthcare law would be transparent or when he promised to raise energy prices), why is there doubt? You want the context? Oh, that's easy. Just google whatever you think is questionable and you should be able to find the entire speech. As for a "non-biased source", the article describes the process the author used to come to his or her conclusions. Why not follow the same process and come to your own conclusion? Why do people need to be spoon fed facts. "I don't want to believe that and I'm too lazy to see for myself, so I'll just close my eyes"? What is that crap? Seriously? |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Weight Loss
Total weight loss: 44 pounds.
No starvation. No salads. No "diet" food. I'll have a late breakfast of sausage and fried eggs and the last of the pot roast for lunch. Dinner is still up in the air. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Ok I'm weirded out
Start taking calcium, that should do the trick.
|
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Weight Loss
Oh what a load of junk science. Nothing against you, it's just amazing to me that doctors are still for whole grains and against saturated fats, despite all of the evidence being that whole grains are bad for you and saturated fats are good.
I'm not doing Atkins or South Beach, I'm doing a paleo diet, which is similar to what our ancestors ate. It's how our bodies are designed to eat. The very idea that we started farming grain a couple thousand years ago and so we should get most of our calories from grains is ridiculous. The same people will tell you that humans have existed, largely unchanged for 250k years will tell you we should all eat a diet that has been around for 9k years. We aren't adapted to that diet and it's not healthy. As for the cancer stuff, oh my God they are out of touch! There are mountains of evidence that low carb diets kill cancer. The reason is that cancer can only live off of glucose and most of our body can live off of ketones. So being on a ketogenic (low carb) diet, starves cancer. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Who's Your Hero and Why?
QUOTE: Anyone who has the courage and convictions to be the guy on the far left. Being on the far left doesn't require "courage and convictions" so much as it requires that you be able to ignore human nature, consider yourself superior to the majority of people, be historically illiterate and most importantly, desire to control other people's lives. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Weight Loss
QUOTE: Just watch your fat and oil consumption too. Some low carb diets put so much of that garbage in your bloodstream it is like a coronary (without the bun). The best bet may still be a balanced low carb, low cal, low fat diet. I've found over the years that I tend to go more vegetarian with complex carbs and low calories and need less food. I still enjoy some meat, cheese, eggs etc. but in smaller quantities and less frequently and I am almost at competition weight.
Nah, natural fats are good for you. I don't eat oils other than coconut and olive oil. If you can't squeeze the source and get oil out of it, I don't eat it. Like corn oil and canola oil and all the vegetable oils, they are made in laboratory using natural and unnatural parts. That's why they are called "franken fats". I don't limit my calories or fat and I only had a problem losing weight when I started drinking diet soda. When you limit your calories, you risk your body going into starvation mode. When you don't eat enough fat, you raise your blood sugar and you run the risk of your liver making the heart attack linked pattern B LDL. I eat until I'm full and I don't get hungry for 5-6 hours. I ate breakfast at 9:30 AM and I'm still not hungry at 2:17 PM. |
|
Spidercmb Joined Fri 04/27/07 Posts: 13189 |
Topic:
Free Will?
QUOTE: QUOTE: QUOTE: If an attractive woman is throwing herself at you self preservation is the ONLY thing that might stop you. In this case, sex with her could mean prison,being labeled a sex criminal and having to register every time you move. If you're married, it could ruin that and you'd end up losing half (if not more) of everything. All this would effect your ability to maintain the life you've built, not to mention you could be killed by an irate father or crazy man i prison. Fear is a prime motivator. Is that true for you? Are you that much of a slave to your flesh that you can't refuse to have sex with a woman for any other reason than self preservation? I don't have women throwing themselves at me every day, but I have turned down women for reasons that have nothing to do with self preservation. What reasons? Give me an example. Personal reasons, which have nothing to do with self preservation. |
).