One way a forgery could be accomplished requires that the high-res version be the same as the obviously doctored version.

Step 1. Remove background and clean up all stray pixels on an original.
Step 2. Clean up text by coloring characters with pure black.
Step 3. Scan other documents to obtain characters needed to re-spell whatever you want. (including signatures)
Step 4. Clean up individual pieces.
Step 5. Rework a new document to appear as close to an original as possible.
Step 6. Overlay doctored copy over background of choice.


I've recreated numerous certificates for various businesses over the years. Regardless of what that guys says, it wouldn't takes weeks to accomplish the cleaning up of that document. 24 hours tops...

JPG's do not support transparency. That means that there has to be yet another image that was used to create that JPG (maybe from the PDF?) as a JPG image placed in the PDF would have entirely covered the background.

Look at the PDF. Pay close attention to that slit down the left side.

Do you still think that PDF is an accurate copy?

Deception breeds doubt and that doc is a breeding ground...

That birth certificate is most assuredly a fake.
A PDF with multiple layers is NOT how a scanned document would appear.

Find someone with Adobe Illustrator to open the PDF and show you.

You would trust an organization that has been found guilty of slander, intimidation, petty grievances and the like...

Acording to the US goverment and thousands of cancer survivors, cancer was cured in the 50's.

Suppression is NOT scientific no matter how much you wish it were the case.

No, The letter J wasn't used until the 1600's.

Besides, what I meant was Jesus' real name has a litteral translation that contradicts the term "Jesus saves"...

Do your own research...

Since funches said that an amoeba is an indication that "Free Will" doesn't require a brain, That means that funches believes that nobody should take him for a rocket scientist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtjvbE9w58A

In the last 100 years dozens of doctors, scientists and researchers have come up with the most diverse, apparently effective solutions against cancer, but none of these was ever taken into serious consideration by official medicine. Most of them were in fact rejected out-front, even though healings were claimed in the thousands, their proposers often being labeled as charlatans, ostracized by the medical community and ultimately forced to leave the country. At the same time more than 20,000 people die of cancer every day, without official medicine being able to offer a true sense of hope to those affected by it. Why? - More info on luogocomune.net - Order the DVD at Amazon.com http://codehazard.com/Play.aspx?ID=449 if you value the film makers research and work to fund further documentaries...

The confusion is yours. Unless you wish to admit to lying earlier about "Free Will" not needing a brain.

Nice... funches admits that "Free Will" exists!

As for an example?
Humans have the capability of predicting the outcomes of their actions, an amoeba does not...

I know what possible outcomes could arise from this post, do you? Will you excercise your "Free Will" or will you be compelled by an unknown force?

The consequences have aboluting NOTHING to do with what free will is. Free will is PURELY the ABILITY or the POSSIBILITY of doing what you want, when you want to do it.

Means we have a CONSCIENCE thought to what we do. We're not just again, puppets on a string that moves and does things because of another's thoughts. We are not robots automatically programmed to do certain things a certain way.

We CHOOSE what we do or don't do through out our day. Thus free will.