Community > Posts By > spqr

 
spqr's photo
Thu 06/05/08 12:23 PM
why...would anything change your mind? lol

Emergency Management:

They completely failed to manage the first large-scale emergency since 9/11. Despite all their big talk and hundreds of billions of dollars spent on homeland security over the past four years, this administration proved itself stunningly incompetent when faced with an actual emergency. (Katrina Relief Funds Squandered)

Fiscal Management:

America is broke. No wait, we're worse than broke. In less than five years these borrow and spend-thrifts have nearly doubled our national debt, to a stunning $8.2 trillion. These are not your father's Republicans who treated public dollars as though they were an endangered species. These Republicans waste money in ways and in quantities that make those old tax and spend liberals of yore look like tight-fisted Scots.

This administration is so incompetent that you can just throw a dart at the front page of your morning paper and whatever story of importance it hits will prove my point.

Katrina relief:

Eleven thousand spanking new mobile homes sinking into the Arkansas mud. Seems no one in the administration knew there were federal and state laws prohibiting trailers in flood zones. Oops. That little mistake cost you $850 million -- and counting.

Medicare Drug Program:

This $50 billion white elephant debuted by trampling many of those it was supposed to save. The mess forced states to step in and try to save its own citizens from being killed by the administration's poorly planned and executed attempt to privatize huge hunks of the federal health safety net.

Afghanistan:

Good managers know that in order to pocket the gains of a project, you have to finish it. This administration started out fine in Afghanistan. They had the Taliban and al Queda on the run and Osama bin Laden trapped in a box canyon. Then they were distracted by a nearby shiney object -- Iraq. We are now $75 billion out of pocket in Afghanistan and its sitting president still rules only within the confines of the nation's capital. Tribal warlords, the growing remnants of the Taliban and al Qaeda call the shots in the rest of the county.

Iraq:

This ill-begotten war was supposed to only cost us $65 billion. It has now cost us over $300 billion and continues to suck $6 billion a month out of our children's futures. Meanwhile the three warring tribes Bush "liberated" are using our money and soldiers' lives to partition the country. The Shiites and Kurds are carving out the prime cuts while treating the once-dominant Sunnis the same way the Israelis treat the Palestinians, forcing them onto Iraq's version of Death Valley. Meanwhile Iran is increasingly calling the shots in the Shiite region as mullahs loyal to Iran take charge. (More)

Iran:

The administration not only jinxed its Afghanistan operations by attacking Iraq, but also provided Iran both the rationale for and time to move toward nuclear weapons. The Bush administration's neocons' threats to attack Syria next only provided more support for religious conservatives within Iran who argued U.S. intentions in the Middle East were clear, and that only the deterrent that comes with nuclear weapons could protect them.

North Korea:

Ditto. Also add to all the above the example North Korea set for Iran. Clearly once a country possesses nukes, the U.S. drops the veiled threats and wants to talk.

Social Programs:

It's easier to get affordable -- even free -- American-style medical care, paid for with American dollars, if you are injured in Iraq, Afghanistan or are victims of a Pakistani earthquake, than if you live and pay taxes in the good old U.S.A. Nearly 50 million Americans can't afford medical insurance. Nevertheless the administration has proposed a budget that will cut $40 billion from domestic social programs, including health care for the working poor. The administration is quick to say that those services will be replaced by its "faith-based" programs. Not so fast...

"Despite the Bush administration's rhetorical support for religious charities, the amount of direct federal grants to faith-based organizations declined from 2002 to 2004, according to a major new study released yesterday....The study released yesterday "is confirmation of the suspicion I've had all along, that what the faith-based initiative is really all about is de-funding social programs and dumping responsibility for the poor on the charitable sector," said Kay Guinane, director of the nonprofit advocacy program at OMB Watch.." (More)
The Military: Overused and over-deployed.


Former Defense Secretary William Perry and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright warned in a 15-page report that the Army and Marine Corps cannot sustain the current operational tempo without "doing real damage to their forces." ... Speaking at a news conference to release the study, Albright said she is "very troubled" the military will not be able to meet demands abroad. Perry warned that the strain, "if not relieved, can have highly corrosive and long-term effects on the military. (More)
With military budgets gutted by the spiraling costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the administration has requested funding for fewer National Guard troops in fiscal 2007 -- 17,000 fewer. Which boggles the sane mind since, if it weren't for reserve/National Guard, the administration would not have had enough troops to rotate forces in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Nearly 40 percent of the troops sent to those two countries were from the reserve and National Guard.

The Environment:

Here's a little pop quiz: What happens if all the coral in the world's oceans dies? Answer: Coral is the first rung on the food-chain ladder; so when it goes, everything else in the ocean dies. And if the oceans die, we die.

The coral in the world's oceans are dying (called "bleaching") at an alarming and accelerating rate. Global warming is the culprit. Nevertheless, this administration continues as the world's leading global warming denier. Why? Because they seem to feel it's more cost effective to be dead than to force reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. How stupid is that? And time is running out.

Trade:

We are approaching a $1 trillion annual trade deficit, most of it with Asia, $220 billion with just China -- just last year.

Energy:

Record high energy prices. Record energy company profits. **** Cheney's energy task force meetings remain secret. Need I say more?

Consumers:

Americans finally did it last year -- they achieved a negative savings rate. (Folks in China save 10 percent, for contrast.) If the government can spend more than it makes and just say "charge it" when it runs out, so can we. The average American now owes $9,000 to credit card companies. Imagine that.

Human Rights:

America now runs secret prisons and a secret judicial system that would give Kafka fits. And the U.S. has joined the list of nations that tortures prisioners of war. (Shut up George! We have pictures!)

100 Mistakes for the President to Choose From
May 3, 2004

PRINT
EMAIL
TEXT: A A A
SHARE
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
reddit
stumbleupon



During a prime time press conference on April 13, President Bush was asked to name a mistake that he has made since taking office and what he has learned from it. Bush, who was unable to answer the question, admitted "maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with [a mistake]." But weeks later, Bush still hasn't answered the question. In the interest of assisting the President with this surprisingly difficult task we've compiled this list of 100 mistakes he has made since taking office:

1. Failing to build a real international coalition prior to the Iraq invasion, forcing the US to shoulder the full cost and consequences of the war.

2. Approving the demobilization of the Iraqi Army in May, 2003 – bypassing the Joint Chiefs of Staff and reversing an earlier position, the President left hundreds of thousands of armed Iraqis disgruntled and unemployed, contributing significantly to the massive security problems American troops have faced during occupation.

3. Not equipping troops in Iraq with adequate body armor or armored HUMVEES.

4. Ignoring the advice Gen. Eric Shinseki regarding the need for more troops in Iraq – now Bush is belatedly adding troops, having allowed the security situation to deteriorate in exactly the way Shinseki said it would if there were not enough troops.

5. Ignoring plans drawn up by the Army War College and other war-planning agencies, which predicted most of the worst security and infrastructure problems America faced in the early days of the Iraq occupation.

6. Making a case for war which ignored intelligence that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.

7. Deriding "nation-building" during the 2000 debates, then engaging American troops in one of the most explicit instances of nation building in American history.

8. Predicting along with others in his administration that US troops would be greeted as liberators in Iraq.

9. Predicting Iraq would pay for its own reconstruction.

10. Wildly underestimating the cost of the war.

11. Trusting Ahmed Chalabi, who has dismissed faulty intelligence he provided the President as necessary for getting the Americans to topple Saddam.

12. Disbanding the Sunni Baathist managers responsible for Iraq's water, electricity, sewer system and all the other critical parts of that country's infrastructure.

13. Failing to give UN weapons inspectors enough time to certify if weapons existed in Iraq.

14. Including discredited intelligence concerning Nigerian Yellow Cake in his 2003 State of the Union.

15. Announcing that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended" aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003, below a "Mission Accomplished" banner – more U.S. soldiers have died in combat since Bush's announcement than before it.

16. Awarding a multi-billion dollar contract to Halliburton in Iraq, which then repeatedly overcharged the government and served troops dirty food.

17. Refusing to cede any control of Post-invasion Iraq to the international community, meaning reconstruction has received limited aid from European allies or the U.N.

18. Failing to convince NATO allies why invading Iraq was important.

19. Having no real plan for the occupation of Iraq.

20. Limiting bidding on Iraq construction projects to "coalition partners," unnecessarily alienating important allies France, Germany and Russia.

21. Diverting $700 million into Iraq invasion planning without informing Congress.

22. Shutting down an Iraqi newspaper for "inciting violence" – the move, which led in short order to street fighting in Fallujah, incited more violence than the newspaper ever had.

23. Telling Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan about plans to go to war with Iraq before Secretary of State Colin Powell.

24. Allowing several members of the Bin Laden family to leave the country just days after 9/11, some of them without being questioned by the FBI.

25. Focusing on missile defense at the expense of counterterrorism prior to 9/11.

26. Thinking al Qaeda could not attack without state sponsors, and ignoring evidence of a growing threat unassociated with "rogue states" like Iraq or North Korea.

27. Threatening to veto the Homeland Security department – The President now concedes such a department "provides the ability for our agencies to coordinate better and to work together better than it was before."

28. Opposing the creation of the September 11th commission, which the President now expects "to contain important recommendations for preventing future attacks."

29. Denying documents to the 9/11 commission, only relenting after the commissioners threatened a subpoena.

30. Failing to pay more attention to an August 6, 2001 PDB entitled "Bin laden Determined to Attack in U.S."

31. Repeatedly ignoring warnings of terrorists planning to use aircraft before 9/11.

32. Appointing the ultra-secretive Henry Kissinger to head the 9/11 commission – Kissinger stepped down weeks later due to conflicts of interest.

33. Asking for testimony before the 9/11 commission be limited to one hour, a position from which the president later backtracked.

34. Not allowing national Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to testify before the 9/11 commission – Bush changed his mind as pressure mounted.

35. Cutting an FBI request for counterterrorism funds by two-thirds after 9/11.

36. Telling Americans there was a link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.

37. Failing to adequately secure the nation's nuclear weapons labs.

38. Not feeling a sense of urgency about terrorism or al Qaeda before 9/11.

39. Reducing resources and troop levels in Afghanistan and out before it was fully secure.

40. Not providing security in Afghanistan outside of Kabul, leaving nearly 80% of the Afghan population unprotected in areas controlled by Feudal warlords and local militias.

41. Committing inadequate resources for the reconstruction of Afghanistan.

42. Counting too heavily on locally trained troops to fill the void in Afghanistan once U.S. forces were relocated to Iraq.

43. Not committing US ground troops to the capture of Osama Bin Laden, when he was cornered in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan in November, 2001.

44. Allowing opium production to resume on a massive scale after the ouster of the Taliban.

45. Opposing an independent inquiry into the intelligence failures surrounding WMD – later, upon signing off on just such a commission, Bush claimed he was "determined to make sure that American intelligence is as accurate as possible for every challenge in the future."

46. Saying: "We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories."

47. Trusting intelligence gathered by Vice President Cheney's and Secretary Rumsfeld's "Office of Special Plans."

48. Spending $6.5 billion on nuclear weapons this year to develop new nuclear weapons this year – 50% more in real dollars than the average during the cold war – while shortchanging the troops on body armor.

49. Ignoring the importance of the Middle East peace process, which has deteriorated with little oversight or strategy evident in the region.

50. Siding with China in February, 2004 against a democratic referenda proposed by Taiwan, a notable shift from an earlier pledge to stand with "oppressed peoples until the day of their freedom finally arrives."

51. Undermining the War on Terrorism by preemptively invading Iraq.

52. Failing to develop a specific plan for dealing with North Korea.

53. Abandoning the United States' traditional role as an evenhanded negotiator in the Middle East peace process.

54. Signing a report endorsing outsourcing with thousands of American workers having their jobs shipped overseas.

55. Instituting steel tariffs deemed illegal by the World Trade Organization – Bush repealed them 20-months later when the European Union pledged to impose retaliatory sanctions on up to $2.2 billion in exports from the United States.

56. Promoting economic policies that failed to create new jobs.

57. Promoting economic policies that failed to help small businesses

58. Pledging a "jobs and growth" package would create 1,836,000 new jobs by the end of 2003 and 5.5 million new jobs by 2004—so far the president has fallen 1,615,000 jobs short of the mark.

59. Running up a foreign deficit of "such record-breaking proportions that it threatens the financial stability of the global economy."

60. Issuing inaccurate budget forecasts accompanying proposals to reduce the deficit, omitting the continued costs of Iraq, Afghanistan and elements of Homeland Security.

61. Claiming his 2003 tax cut would give 23 million small business owners an average tax cut of $2,042 when "nearly four out of every five tax filers (79%) with small business income would receive less" than that amount.

62. Passing tax cuts for the wealthy while falsely claiming "people in the 10 percent bracket" were benefiting most."

63. Passing successive tax cuts largely responsible for turning a projected surplus of $5 trillion into a projected deficit of $4.3 trillion.

64. Moving to strip millions of overtime pay.

65. Not enforcing corporate tax laws.

66. Backing down from a plan to make CEOs more accountable when "the corporate crowd" protested.

67. Not lobbying oil cartels to change their mind about cutting oil production.

68. Passing tax cuts weighted heavily to help the wealthy.

69. Moving to allow greater media consolidation.

70. Nominating a notorious proponent of outsourcing, Anthony F. Raimondo, to be the new manufacturing Czar—Raimondo withdrew his name days later amidst a flurry of harsh criticism.

71. Ignoring calls to extend unemployment benefits with long-term unemployment reaching a twenty-year high

72. Threatening to veto pension legislation that would give companies much needed temporary relief.

73. Under-funding No Child Left Behind

74. Breaking his campaign pledge to increase the size of Pell grants.

75. Signing off on an FY 2005 budget proposing the smallest increase in education funding in nine years.

76. Under-funding the Title I Program, specifically targeted for disadvantaged kids, by $7.2 billion.

77. Freezing Teacher Quality State Grants, cutting off training opportunities for about 30,000 teachers, and leaving 92,000 less

teachers trained than the president called for in his own No Child Left Behind bill.

78. Freezing funding for English language training programs.

79. Freezing funding for after school programs, potentially eliminating 50,000 children from after-school programs.

80. Not leveling with Americans about the cost of Medicare – the president told Congress his new Medicare bill would cost $400 billion over ten years despite conclusions by his own analysts the bill would cost upwards of $500 billion over that period.

81. Silencing Medicare actuary Richard Foster when his estimates for the Administration's Medicare bill were too high.

82. Letting business associate David Halbert, who owns a company which stands to make millions from new discount drug cards, craft key elements of the new Medicare bill.

83. Underfunding health care for troops and veterans.

84. Allowing loopholes to persist in Mad-Cow regulations.

85. Relaxing food labeling restrictions on health claims.

86. Falsely claiming the restrictions on stem cell research would not hamper medical progress.

87. Reducing action against improper drug advertising by 80 percent.

88. Abandoning the Kyoto Treaty without offering an alternative for reducing greenhouse effect.

89. Counting on a voluntary program to reduce emissions of harmful gasses—so far only a tiny fraction of American companies have signed up.

90. Gutting clean air standards for aging power plants.

91. Weakening energy efficiency standards.

92. Relaxing dumping standards for mountaintop mining, and opening the Florida Everglades and Oregon's Siskiyou National Forest to mining.

93. Lifting protection for more than 200 million acres of public land.

94. Limiting public challenges to logging projects and increased logging in protected areas, including Alaska's Tongass National Forest.

95. Weakening environmental standards for snowmobiles and other off-road vehicles while pushing for exemptions for air pollution proposals for five categories of industrial facilities.

96. Opposing legislation that would require greater fuel efficiency for passenger cars.

97. Reducing inspections, penalties for violations, and prosecution of environmental crimes.

98. Misleading the public about the Washington mad cow case and the likely effectiveness of USDA's weak testing program.

99. Withdrawing public information on chemical plant dangers, previously used to hold facilities accountable for safety improvements.

100. Cutting grants to state and local governments in FY 2005, forcing states to make massive cuts in job training, education, housing and environment.




spqr's photo
Thu 06/05/08 11:16 AM
Edited by spqr on Thu 06/05/08 11:17 AM

My, my, are you not in a pleasant mood tonight?

Odd, I cannot remember you ever giving any research, intelligent reasoning or plain old common sense for what you post.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm

Lindyy




You are really testing my respect for elders. Lady...
You mention common sense? Intelligent reasoning ? what's that a joke? lol You keep supporting the bloodsucker util the end...and mention common sense?

ciao bella.
oh and thanks for the less revealing shirt. noway


spqr's photo
Wed 06/04/08 05:35 PM

why for guys only girls hunt to i least i do and i am very good with my rifle:smile: :wink:


laugh
Yeah I can believe that...lol Always loaded hm?

spqr's photo
Wed 06/04/08 05:10 PM


Cindy for FIRST LADY!



Yea Cindy! Cindy, Cindy, YEA Cindy!!!


Sushi:

Keep an eye on things for me, I am going to Switzerland to check out this guy!!!

I need a break from these leftie libbers.


Lol..pure insanity..I guess must be the age.
Bush is a Fuc8tard of historic proportions, he will be remembered as the most idiotic, incompetent, ignorant president in human history.
If he doesn't end in jail with Cheney and Rumsfield.

spqr's photo
Wed 06/04/08 04:44 PM
yashafox


This is a mystical union of the couple's hearts and lives. Throughout the Bible, God treats this special partnership seriously.


Obviously you've never been married.
Mystical union My royal A**

spqr's photo
Wed 06/04/08 04:40 PM
dirtyblonde007

why can't men respect a woman's choice to remain abstinent until marriage? i have encountered several who feel that even though i was married once, that i can continue to have sex. i feel like god commanded me to remain pure until i enter a union in holy matrimony. therefore, i choose not to until i remarry if that is god's will.
anyone else have similar problems?


Oh absolutely...youhave no idea how hard is to remain virgin for a man...with all this women only looking for sex....


gawdblesshhyayawn

spqr's photo
Wed 06/04/08 04:32 PM
Drivinmenutz



the war is over for the ausies and I am sure many american GI's wish it were over for them.


I'm sure most of them would rather go home because the mission was accomplished...


Just out of curiosity, when do you think we can pull out from there? Yes leaving a base there is an option, but when you start to leave Iraq to the Iraqis?
Unless you plan to make it the 51st state they need to be able to care for themselves. How many more soldier killed does that take?
And don't answer "a la Bush" enough of that bull****...

spqr's photo
Tue 06/03/08 04:53 PM
None, I was still in ROme back then, no fastfood whatsoever...:P

spqr's photo
Fri 05/30/08 04:43 PM
Awesome.
How much one of those cost? Are all amputee veterans going to be covered by federal funds?

spqr's photo
Fri 05/30/08 04:20 PM

im not completely out of hot water...still things going on, but ill take that compared to cancer any day!!!!!


Happy for you!

One question if I may...why you consider a miracle that "god" saved you from cancer? If you believe that was an act of god also getting it was one?

So were's the logic? Why would this god gave you a cancer and then cure you miracolously?

happy for you that you're better now.

spqr's photo
Thu 05/29/08 03:22 PM

Who may I ask cares he is only in office for another 8 months.


I would say the parents of 4.000 soldiers killed, almost as much suicidal because of depression after 4 TOD in Iraq, and about an UNKNOWN number of amputees and double amputees / blinds / you name it...Besides the hundred of thousand of iraqui civilian killed in the past years?

spqr's photo
Thu 05/29/08 11:59 AM

actually the impeachment was for lying under oath


You are absolutely right, Lying under oath is a crime.



"In early December of 2005, a New York Times-CBS nationwide poll showed that the majority of Americans believed

Bush "intentionally misled" the nation to promote a war in Iraq.

A December 11, 2005, article in the Los Angeles Times, after citing this national poll, went on to say that because so many Americans believed this, it might be difficult for Bush to get the continuing support of Americans for the war. In other words, the fact that most Americans believed Bush had deliberately misled them into war was of no consequence in and of itself. Its only consequence was that it might hurt his efforts to get support for the war thereafter. So the article was reporting on the effect of the poll findings as if it was reporting on the popularity, or lack thereof, of Bush's position on global warming or immigration. Didn't the author of the article know that Bush taking the nation to war on a lie (if such be the case) is the equivalent of saying he is responsible for well over 100,000 deaths? One would never know this by reading the article."


spqr's photo
Thu 05/29/08 11:33 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vincent-bugliosi/the-prosecution-of-george_b_102427.html

"in America, we apparently impeach presidents for having consensual sex outside of marriage and trying to cover it up. If we impeach presidents for that, then if the president takes the country to war on a lie where thousands of American soldiers die horrible, violent deaths and over 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, including women and children, even babies are killed, the punishment obviously has to be much, much more severe. That's just common sense. If Bush were impeached, convicted in the Senate, and removed from office, he'd still be a free man, still be able to wake up in the morning with his cup of coffee and freshly squeezed orange juice and read the morning paper, still travel widely and lead a life of privilege, still belong to his country club and get standing ovations whenever he chose to speak to the Republican faithful. This, for being responsible for over 100,000 horrible deaths?* For anyone interested in true justice, impeachment alone would be a joke for what Bush did.
"

spqr's photo
Wed 05/28/08 05:15 PM

In another thread it was noted that Opra has changed the way she referrs to God on her show or in public appearences.
Though I really don't remember her promoting Jesus and the Bible, some think that over the years she has left Jesus and the Bible out of it, for the sake of appeasing a less Christian following. Succumbing to the hand of Greed that Satan held out.

What do you think of any major celebrity or politician being vocal about their religious views? Do you think it is dangerous?

What if the view promotes a belief in God but there is disodence between the belief and what the person promotes publicly. Like body immage, fashion, support of the GLBT?

Is that dangerous?

laugh laugh laugh laugh

Very dangerous..the end is near...repent!

spqr's photo
Wed 05/28/08 12:57 PM

Ok, there were only three PBYs patrolling when the attack occured! But the station was new and some buildings were still under construction.

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/pearlhbr/ph-kan.htm


Ok..so you are saying there was no way to spot the entire japanese fleet approaching the coast...I find it hard to believe in war times.

As for Marine, yes I am a US citizen, and no I was born and raised in Rome, Italy. But what;s your point? Anyone able to read can learn history...no need for Google, I studied American history in High School.

spqr's photo
Fri 05/23/08 05:00 PM
link please?

spqr's photo
Fri 05/23/08 04:48 PM


seaworthy1963

Been going on since Bush v. Gore. Won't stop.

I wonder if we would have been better off with Gore. Think about that one lefties. What would he have done? After WTC was bombed in Feb '93, Bill Clinton, along with VP Al Gore, brought criminal charges. No other action was taken.

Only one person has had to make the decision. All the rest of us are rock throwers.

Glad this mentality wasn't around in Dec '41.

After the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor, can anyone tell me what country the U.S. invaded?


Can you explain me by wich strategic plan you align your WHOLE fleet in one harbor without even a patrol plane 100 miles out while a WORLD WAR is going on? Not a coast guard boat, a destroyer...nothing.

Why would you do that? Think about it.




This is not true spqr!

What about the USS Ward?drinker


oh you're right.
They had ONE destroyer defending the whole bay...again geniuses of tactic hm?

http://www.history.navy.mil/docs/wwii/pearl/ph97.htm


spqr's photo
Fri 05/23/08 04:16 PM


seaworthy1963

Been going on since Bush v. Gore. Won't stop.

I wonder if we would have been better off with Gore. Think about that one lefties. What would he have done? After WTC was bombed in Feb '93, Bill Clinton, along with VP Al Gore, brought criminal charges. No other action was taken.

Only one person has had to make the decision. All the rest of us are rock throwers.

Glad this mentality wasn't around in Dec '41.

After the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor, can anyone tell me what country the U.S. invaded?


Can you explain me by wich strategic plan you align your WHOLE fleet in one harbor without even a patrol plane 100 miles out while a WORLD WAR is going on? Not a coast guard boat, a destroyer...nothing.

Why would you do that? Think about it.


Probably because some liberal said the noise from the planes and ships would disturb the breeding grounds of the sea life.grumble


Wow what a genius...trying to be funny mate? We're talking about pearl harbor a military base, during world war2

I'd say probably because they needed an excuse BADLY to enter the war, as usual the hell with lives and costitution and people...all hail our lord the dollar hm?

Nowadays they don't even look for an excuse, they fabricate one and openly deny it later..and you guys are even happy to support them even today.
they did a great training job I must say.





spqr's photo
Fri 05/23/08 03:04 PM
seaworthy1963

Been going on since Bush v. Gore. Won't stop.

I wonder if we would have been better off with Gore. Think about that one lefties. What would he have done? After WTC was bombed in Feb '93, Bill Clinton, along with VP Al Gore, brought criminal charges. No other action was taken.

Only one person has had to make the decision. All the rest of us are rock throwers.

Glad this mentality wasn't around in Dec '41.

After the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor, can anyone tell me what country the U.S. invaded?


Can you explain me by wich strategic plan you align your WHOLE fleet in one harbor without even a patrol plane 100 miles out while a WORLD WAR is going on? Not a coast guard boat, a destroyer...nothing.

Why would you do that? Think about it.


spqr's photo
Thu 05/22/08 10:36 AM
karmafury

The Swiss have the right idea.

All able-bodied Swiss males aged between 19 and 31 must serve, and although entry to recruit school may be delayed due to senior secondary school, it is no longer possible to postpone it for university studies. About one third is excluded for various reasons, and these either serve in Civil Protection or Civilian Service.


The main difference is that the swiss...didn't have a major war PER generation.
USA seems to be a nation ADDICTED to war. Why? Qui Prodest?
(who benefits from it?)

Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 18 19