Yo folks. sup? this is my 1st post here on this site. this topic caught my fancy.

i happen to have studied this topic for years now. i'm not saying i'm a mathematician mind you but hear me out.

So 1st of all lets think about all this logically.

they say the big bang was sparked by quantum fluctuations. The antimatter & quantum vacuum are what is being argued. in which virtual particles appear & then destroy each other. they're is nothing left over. paul diracs equation predicted this but as i recall (correct me if i'm wrong plz) in order for the matter to not be destroyed & become a part of the more solid world, this means there must be another matter for it to hook on too right?

It's also interesting to note how string theory is added to it but there are many physicists that simply say it's overinflated in worth. mostly cuz its all confined to simulation not real world controlled testing. apparently there's like a 60 or 70% success rate or something with there models on some things.

They bring string theory into it to start telling us about a multiverse. Now here's the thing. to say multiverse to to say that the known universe that we've mapped out is all there is & there's copies of it out there somehow. it's totally unprovable & actually a kind to religion in that way. it reminds me of an ancient mythological motif, the world egg or the cosmic egg. parthenogenesis, look up that phrase in relation to religion.

they base this off the idea that well in the quantum world, mathematically, all scenarios that could possibly exist all happen simultaneously therefor... multiverse. i'm like what! why? based on what some psychedelic experience cuz... humgf... ya know i'm cool with that... but lol you know.

it's not like you can visit these alt worlds. also keep in mind just cuz the math says something must exist doesn't always ring true. other times it's not real, it's for an abstract purpose. like negative numbers, they don't actually exist but they exist in relation to other things.

Then there's the problem of how did the inflation go faster than the speed of light? i thought Einstein said that was impossible?

all this to bring you to a universe filled with clouds of hydrogen that are hot.

now of course the big bang theory was made to explain where the hydrogen came from of course. but here's an alt, is it possible that the big bang was simply a super massive black hole that finally exploded releasing all the stuff built up? if you don't know what i mean, it's well known that any atom, no matter what kind on the periodic table of elements into a singularity whether it be a black hole, quasar, ect. when it's finally released, the result is hydrogen.

and that theory doesn't disobey any of the laws of physics, the other does.

Actually there's a whole debate on the idea known as plasma cosmology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology


here's some useful sources:... thoughts
Inflationary cosmology on trial lecture by Dr. Paul J. Steinhardt, the Albert Einstein Professor in Science and director of the Princeton Center for Theoretical Science at Princeton University.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcxptIJS7kQ

Plasma Physics' Answers to the New Cosmological Questions by Dr. Donald E. Scott of NASA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8tqgntbjyE

The Electric Universe Illuminates Recent Discoveries
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtFTRBSUMV8

"Dark Matter" proof, Synchrotron radiation actually supports Electric Universe, Plasma Cosmology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgMldh8hL3w

The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe by Eric J. Lerner a popular science writer, his book is based on Hannes Alfv�n theory of Plasma Cosmology.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Big-Bang-Never-Happened/dp/067974049X

Cosmic Plasma by Swedish electrical engineer, plasma physicist and winner of the 1970 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on magnetohydrodynamics Hannes Alfven
http://www.amazon.com/Cosmic-Plasma-Astrophysics-Science-Library/dp/9027711518

String Theory is Pseudoscience
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=4219
http://profmattstrassler.com/2013/09/19/am-i-misleading-you-about-string-theory/
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2006/09/the_trouble_with_string_theory.html
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392094,00.asp
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/science/2013/08/18/1-string-theory-takes-a-hit-in-latest-experiments.html
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1226142,00.html
http://www.firstpost.com/topic/product/higgs-boson-superstring-theory-proven-wrong-by-lhc-supersymmetry-debun-video-GPKj73pSBdw-86998-50.html

The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next by Lee Smolin, theoretical physicist, faculty member at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Waterloo & member of the graduate faculty of the philosophy department at the University of Toronto.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Trouble-With-Physics-Science/dp/061891868X/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense by Michael Shermer, science writer, historian of science, founder of The Skeptics Society, and Editor in Chief of its magazine Skeptic
http://books.google.com/books?id=KCanmmIb8QUC&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false