100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: anybody hear the Rumsfeld tape? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
because i will be quickly deleted.....in fact i must already be on borrowed time.... i so needed to have some distraction and comic relief many many peole here on this site are dear friends of mine for almost 4 years now...we've been thru alot together.... i am in Niger...on a satcom. in the middle of a horriffic epidemic.... i need to have this opportunity to spill some of my self... to water the garden of my freindships...to let peple know what the media keeps completely hidden....to touch hearts with those i love..here we find ourselves easily, emailing seems to get waylaid sometimes lost even....this medium does not crash my computer and skype does here and so does msn....this is my lifeline.... lucky for me i have been tagged the cockroach....niet for nix!!!  In that case, I will continue to try to speak truth, if I say something and I find out later I was wrong, I'll jump back up on my soap box and retract it and Hopefully I'll provide some good information to all the people here, including yourself, who regardless of political affiliations and belief systems all care about this Nation! Stay safe and I'll have a little chat with God, as I know him, about keeping you protected from harm. and names have been changed to protect the innocent..... so they call 'him' god now???? lmao |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks though..... as she scampers across the floor and hides in a shadow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It bugs me this way- The Neocons have written repeatedly about using terror attacks to push their agenda's, calling for a "new pearl harbor" to polarize the Nationalism of the citizenry to get behind their ideals. Then 9/11 happened. Now they are talking about needing a new 9/11 to do the same thing and not just Rumsfeld. Now whether or not 9/11 was a false flag event remains to be seen, as far as my digging into it goes, but we can prove very easily that Governments throughout history, including our own, have used false flag events to push political agendas. See the Reichstagg fire, the Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Northwoods... on and on we could go. Terrorism, true terrorism, is a small threat, especially here. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, killed by a dog, killed in a car wreck or killed while being mugged than you do of being killed by terrorism. I think you are mis-interpreting what Rummy or any of the "neo-cons" are saying..."needing" an attack like 911...they are just stating that it would take another 911 to wake people up to the fact how real the threat of terrorism is...just like people like you who think " Terrorism, true terrorism, is a small threat, especially here. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, killed by a dog, killed in a car wreck or killed while being mugged than you do of being killed by terrorism." The REASON the threat is so small is the intel programs in place since 911 (WHICH YOU ARE PROBABLY AGAINST)have stopped countless terroist plots, from blowing up bridges to more planes and yes..I'll say it too...It will take another 911 for someone like you to see that!I guess we will have to wait for Barrack or Hillary to get in and have mall bombings everyday before you realize just how well we have managed to keep the terrorists disorganized and on the run with no real safe haven to train and organize their plans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It bugs me this way- The Neocons have written repeatedly about using terror attacks to push their agenda's, calling for a "new pearl harbor" to polarize the Nationalism of the citizenry to get behind their ideals. Then 9/11 happened. Now they are talking about needing a new 9/11 to do the same thing and not just Rumsfeld. Now whether or not 9/11 was a false flag event remains to be seen, as far as my digging into it goes, but we can prove very easily that Governments throughout history, including our own, have used false flag events to push political agendas. See the Reichstagg fire, the Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Northwoods... on and on we could go. Terrorism, true terrorism, is a small threat, especially here. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, killed by a dog, killed in a car wreck or killed while being mugged than you do of being killed by terrorism. I think you are mis-interpreting what Rummy or any of the "neo-cons" are saying..."needing" an attack like 911...they are just stating that it would take another 911 to wake people up to the fact how real the threat of terrorism is...just like people like you who think " Terrorism, true terrorism, is a small threat, especially here. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, killed by a dog, killed in a car wreck or killed while being mugged than you do of being killed by terrorism." The REASON the threat is so small is the intel programs in place since 911 (WHICH YOU ARE PROBABLY AGAINST)have stopped countless terroist plots, from blowing up bridges to more planes and yes..I'll say it too...It will take another 911 for someone like you to see that!I guess we will have to wait for Barrack or Hillary to get in and have mall bombings everyday before you realize just how well we have managed to keep the terrorists disorganized and on the run with no real safe haven to train and organize their plans. Good job redwine-with becoming a sheeple!  I knew you could do it!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It bugs me this way- The Neocons have written repeatedly about using terror attacks to push their agenda's, calling for a "new pearl harbor" to polarize the Nationalism of the citizenry to get behind their ideals. Then 9/11 happened. Now they are talking about needing a new 9/11 to do the same thing and not just Rumsfeld. Now whether or not 9/11 was a false flag event remains to be seen, as far as my digging into it goes, but we can prove very easily that Governments throughout history, including our own, have used false flag events to push political agendas. See the Reichstagg fire, the Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Northwoods... on and on we could go. Terrorism, true terrorism, is a small threat, especially here. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, killed by a dog, killed in a car wreck or killed while being mugged than you do of being killed by terrorism. I think you are mis-interpreting what Rummy or any of the "neo-cons" are saying..."needing" an attack like 911...they are just stating that it would take another 911 to wake people up to the fact how real the threat of terrorism is...just like people like you who think " Terrorism, true terrorism, is a small threat, especially here. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, killed by a dog, killed in a car wreck or killed while being mugged than you do of being killed by terrorism." The REASON the threat is so small is the intel programs in place since 911 (WHICH YOU ARE PROBABLY AGAINST)have stopped countless terroist plots, from blowing up bridges to more planes and yes..I'll say it too...It will take another 911 for someone like you to see that!I guess we will have to wait for Barrack or Hillary to get in and have mall bombings everyday before you realize just how well we have managed to keep the terrorists disorganized and on the run with no real safe haven to train and organize their plans. Good job redwine-with becoming a sheeple! I knew you could do it!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
