Nassim Haramein's lifelong journey into the geometry of space-time has lead to a coherent understanding of the fundamental structure of the universe."

So without having to sit through 8 hours does he ever get around to explaining the fundamental structure of the universe using any math at all?

This intro vid just sounds like amateur popular physics meets self actualization seminars.

Very interesting and enlightening.

Glad you liked it, I always favor those who challenge the status quo, even if they are wrong.

About the history section of his lecture, I'm not quite in agreement, although I do agree with the assesment that we aren't the most advanced civilization on Earth.

As the saying goes - Every generation thinks they are smarter than the one before and wiser than the one after.

About his comet twice the size of Jupiter and something I found on a forum:


"The event he was referring to was Comet NEAT (C/2002 V1) which made a close approach to the sun beginning Feb 15th through the 20th and although its corona may have grown larger than Jupiter but it’s mass was definitely not twice that of Jupiter. I have not been able to find a specific article that identifies its exact mass other than general references to its mass as nothing out of the ordinary although I feel most confident it is out there. I have provided links to the information so you can make up your own mind.

I will say this, I have really enjoyed watching Nassim's video on Youtube and think he is extremely intelligent and intuitive and I think he has some very intriguing theories related to the physics of the universe. I am especially interested in his theory related to singularities and their relationship to un-identified mass in the universe, yes I am one of those still not convinced that black matter exist.... I also appreciate how he identifies where physicist gloss over -or conveniently overlook- information that does not substantiate their belief system and or view on the nature of the universe; which he is ironically mirroring by stating information as fact when it took me no more than an hour searching the net to show his information was incorrect. This only discredits him and his physics when he does not validate the information he is presenting before he states it as fact. He also loses me, and many others I am sure, when he begins to elaborate on how aliens are trying to communicate the mysteries of the universe to us through crop circles and that aliens built the pyramids. Doing so will only steer people away from the real genius behind his work and limit the available resources that could be dedicated to investigate it, which would be a great tragedy."



Here is link that even talks the comet conspiracy he referred to http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/comet_conspiracy_030228.html

http://www.gulfcoastnews.com/GCNstories/gcncomet.htm

He really needs to just concentrate the fractional universe-idea and the black hole theory and steer clear from the rest of the stuff. Mozes stealing the crystal device and splitting water with it and talking about where the arc of the covenant is really just something that is beyond and controversial..he shouldn't even get into those topics.

He talks a lot about geometry, but I don't see any math, or any research.

Has he published anything in any reputable scientific peer reviewed articles?

Starting from popular physics then trying to sync up your science is backarsewards.

Well the only reason I remain skeptical is 1 reason and it certainly isn't a valid reason, just a gut reaction.

Most experienced scientists and mathematicians are extremely humble in there conclusions due to the backlash of making glorious claims if they turn out to be wrong.

Not to mention the science community respects humble intelligence above all else it seems.

This weekend I will check some of it out, however I am not schooled enough to verify his statements, unless of course he provides some math that I can send to some friends of mine hehe.

Perhaps I can at least identify some of his claims to detail here.

I think he is talented in math, and very creative minded but not a scholar.

My inner skeptic sees him as rather "out there on the edge" and he even admits that he is "way out there on the fringe" with his ideas.

I personally don't think he will be taken seriously unless his solutions really do work .. as he claims they do.

But if they do work, and they pose more questions than answers, they might be ignored by the scientific community.

But I think he may have stumbled upon something important where the structure of space is concerned that will actually be a step in the direction of proving the holographic nature of this reality.

Then he gets into crop circles and proves that we have been contacted by a higher intelligence with these crop circles

So much to say... so little to prove.

Crop circles are bogus. They prove nothing about contact from other intelligent life forms. They are and can be shown to be made with a little planning, a rope, and a tamping board which swings arcs from different positions by the designer of the circles.

A unified theory is the holy grail of science...

We shall see.

Personally, I feel that anyone who believes that crop circles exist as a result from aliens visiting us has much to learn about proof, and even more about research.

Ah well, freedom of speech is a beautiful thing.

That could be a fantastic basis for a philosophical discussion...