Previous 1 3
Topic: Is the Mutual Match really works?
no photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:21 PM
I am just wondering because I got replies back and I sent emails but it does not seem to work?
How about you?

Peccy's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:31 PM
Not sure, never tried it. Ask Patsfan.

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:32 PM
Edited by MelodyGirl on Tue 07/13/10 01:32 PM
It's only as successful as the other half.

I've mutual matched with a handful of guys. After I get the notice I have a mutual match, I email them. 99% of the time I never get a reply back - so I delete them.

I did mutual match a person last year and we dated for 7 months. He lived 3,000 miles away. It does work but don't have great expectations.

Gossipmpm's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:33 PM
Hahaha

I finished collecting them by state

now I am sorting by name




Do you have any idea how many men have "69" at the end of their names!!!!:heart:

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:36 PM

I am just wondering because I got replies back and I sent emails but it does not seem to work?
How about you?


I just noticed you listed yourself as only wanting casual sex and an intimate encounter. More than likely you are not getting replies because most women are not interested in intimate encounters – which is why we can block anyone who lists “intimate encounter”. Not all, but the majority of people who want to “match” are probably interested in a deeper relationship.

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:37 PM

Hahaha

I finished collecting them by state

now I am sorting by name




Do you have any idea how many men have "69" at the end of their names!!!!:heart:


slaphead Ridiculous, uh? I wish I had a penny for every male profile that listed their sexual prowess and skill level. I'm sure guys see the same thing from women.

horzman's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:37 PM
never tried it either, I guess I am not investing enough time.


Goofball73's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:38 PM

Hahaha

I finished collecting them by state

now I am sorting by name




Do you have any idea how many men have "69" at the end of their names!!!!:heart:


Now why didn't I think of doing that. Goofball69......has a nice ring to it.:thumbsup: :laughing:

no photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:39 PM
I see!
I was also wondering since obviously u girls get flooded with matches and I was not sure if you go through them all. Or even have the chance to.
yes that's true I am looking for intimate encounter. The heart is already beaten up enough and need time to recover!

Then this site sounds not where I should be right? Any suggestions?

hmlover's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:40 PM

Now why didn't I think of doing that. Goofball69......has a nice ring to it.:thumbsup: :laughing:


And here I though "73" was a statement of how much kinkier you were! laugh

no photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:40 PM


Hahaha

I finished collecting them by state

now I am sorting by name




Do you have any idea how many men have "69" at the end of their names!!!!:heart:


slaphead Ridiculous, uh? I wish I had a penny for every male profile that listed their sexual prowess and skill level. I'm sure guys see the same thing from women.



Not exactly bigsmile

FearandLoathing's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:40 PM
It is terrible. Me and Pats used to offer the "Mutual Match Platinum!" But since Mingle converted to their upgrade option we have to find a different marketing technique.

But, for a limited time, only $14.99 nets you what is left of the "Mutual Match Platinum!" That's right! Only $14.99 and you are on your way to finding sex or more!*

*Offer not valid in all states, offer is subject to termination at any time without refund.

hmlover's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:41 PM

I just noticed you listed yourself as only wanting casual sex and an intimate encounter. More than likely you are not getting replies because most women are not interested in intimate encounters – which is why we can block anyone who lists “intimate encounter”. Not all, but the majority of people who want to “match” are probably interested in a deeper relationship.


So, the match system doesn't match people by what they are seeking? Kind of useless if that's the case...

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:42 PM

I see!
I was also wondering since obviously u girls get flooded with matches and I was not sure if you go through them all. Or even have the chance to.
yes that's true I am looking for intimate encounter. The heart is already beaten up enough and need time to recover!

Then this site sounds not where I should be right? Any suggestions?

I would never say that Mingle is not a place to be. This site is great for fostering friendships as well as matches. I have met many girlfriends too - not just men for dating.

Mingle has someone for everyone. There are girls who only want casual sex too but probably harder to find AND in your area. I mean, if all you want is sex - you have to meet someone in your area to have sex!

I think there are local sites for "hook ups". I don't know - not my vibe.

no photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:45 PM


I just noticed you listed yourself as only wanting casual sex and an intimate encounter. More than likely you are not getting replies because most women are not interested in intimate encounters – which is why we can block anyone who lists “intimate encounter”. Not all, but the majority of people who want to “match” are probably interested in a deeper relationship.


So, the match system doesn't match people by what they are seeking? Kind of useless if that's the case...


agree

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:47 PM
Edited by MelodyGirl on Tue 07/13/10 01:49 PM


I just noticed you listed yourself as only wanting casual sex and an intimate encounter. More than likely you are not getting replies because most women are not interested in intimate encounters – which is why we can block anyone who lists “intimate encounter”. Not all, but the majority of people who want to “match” are probably interested in a deeper relationship.


So, the match system doesn't match people by what they are seeking? Kind of useless if that's the case...



Mutual match means each person has clicked YES to the possible matches offered.

I receive matches that seek intimate encounters even though I don't list that as my criteria. I also get men shorter then 6.0, with kids, a listed religion, etc. I don't think the matches are very exact. I don’t mind. I like reading profiles. I still click "no" but I don't mind getting them.

If both peeps click "yes" then maybe criteria became inconsequential and they are interested anyway? That’s what can be very cool about a surprise profile. :thumbsup: flowerforyou

I've clicked "yes" to a few with intimate encounter but since I have them "blocked" from emailing me, I have to email first if we mutual match. laugh It usually fizzles out after a few emails because they don't want to have a conversation. Hey, at least I try! frustrated laugh

Goofball73's photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:48 PM


Now why didn't I think of doing that. Goofball69......has a nice ring to it.:thumbsup: :laughing:


And here I though "73" was a statement of how much kinkier you were! laugh



I would have used 72.4 if I was going to show how "kinky" I was. laugh

no photo
Tue 07/13/10 01:57 PM


I receive matches that seek intimate encounters even though I don't list that as my criteria. I also get men shorter then 6.0, with kids, a listed religion, etc. I don't think the matches are very exact. I don’t mind. I like reading profiles. I still click "no" but I don't mind getting them.

If both peeps click "yes" then maybe criteria became inconsequential and they are interested anyway? That’s what can be very cool about a surprise profile. :thumbsup: flowerforyou

I've clicked "yes" to a few with intimate encounter but since I have them "blocked" from emailing me, I have to email first if we mutual match. laugh It usually fizzles out after a few emails because they don't want to have a conversation. Hey, at least I try! frustrated laugh



To be honest I don't read profiles. I feel it is waste of time if she was not interested back. And I found most women don't reply back, maybe already flooded hmmm
I however read those look appealing winking

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 02:07 PM



I receive matches that seek intimate encounters even though I don't list that as my criteria. I also get men shorter then 6.0, with kids, a listed religion, etc. I don't think the matches are very exact. I don’t mind. I like reading profiles. I still click "no" but I don't mind getting them.

If both peeps click "yes" then maybe criteria became inconsequential and they are interested anyway? That’s what can be very cool about a surprise profile. :thumbsup: flowerforyou

I've clicked "yes" to a few with intimate encounter but since I have them "blocked" from emailing me, I have to email first if we mutual match. laugh It usually fizzles out after a few emails because they don't want to have a conversation. Hey, at least I try! frustrated laugh



To be honest I don't read profiles. I feel it is waste of time if she was not interested back. And I found most women don't reply back, maybe already flooded hmmm
I however read those look appealing winking


So, if you don't read profiles, how do you know if she is interesting to you? Even if you only want sex, don't you at least need some common ground? You can't just show up with your pants down right? laugh

I avoid those without profile information. How will I know if they are a match without an essay or details?

Again, we are out for different things. I guess that is the difference.

MelodyGirl's photo
Tue 07/13/10 02:09 PM
Edited by MelodyGirl on Tue 07/13/10 02:11 PM


And I found most women don't reply back, maybe already flooded hmmm
I however read those look appealing winking



Unfortunately for all of us - this boils down to attraction. Many times if a person doesn't reply, they are not interested for one reason or another.

You might want to add more pictures. You only have one that is distorted or has an effect on the image. Maybe you aren’t given a clear example of your appearance? We can't see your eyes and your hand is covering the rest of your face. Maybe they think you have bad teeth and only one eye? laugh (j/k)

Previous 1 3