Is the moon a spaceship or giant computer?

Who built the moon?
(a book by Christopher Knight, Alan Butler---(Authors)

The authors of Civilization One return, bringing new evidence about the Moon that will shake up our world. Christopher Knight and Alan Butler realized that the ancient system of geometry they presented in their earlier, breakthrough study works as perfectly for the Moon as it does the Earth. They found a consistent sequence of integer numbers that they can apply to every major aspect of the Moon; no such pattern emerges for any other planet or moon in the solar system. In addition, Knight and Butler discovered that the Moon possesses few or no heavy metals and has no core—something that should not be possible. Their persuasive conclusion: if higher life only developed on Earth because the Moon is exactly what it is and where it is, it becomes unreasonable to cling to the idea that the Moon is a natural object—an idea with profound implications.

The book: http://www.amazon.com/Who-Built-Moon-Christopher-Knight/dp/1842931636

Is the moon hollow? Some people think it is.

Rings Like A Bell

Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow ob-ject' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour.

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html



Did you Know the Crater Bottoms Are Convex Instead of Concave?

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal.


Two Soviet scientists, Vasin and Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.

The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).

i have read this too, and thought it was interesting... but then they have found evidence of volcanic activity on the moon, and that would make it not hollow... plus, some of the meteors that have hit it have been pretty big, and the energies created would have crushed a hollow moon....

I have never heard about evidence of volcanic activity. As far as a large meteor crushing the moon, you don't really know how thick the shell of the moon is. Maybe it would just dent the moon. LOL

How could you crush something that is metal without anything to offer resistance? It would be more likely that something large would knock the moon out of its normal orbit.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070822132131.htm

there is some information on it, but all of it is just reasonable assumptions..

and guesses.

They of course are assuming the moon is not hollow or made of some kind of metal.

This thread shouldn't be in the science section.

Haliburton

Sorry...In a funny mood this morning

Bull crap.

Who are you the thread police???

If you have anything to say about this topic say it.

You probably still believe that we sent men to the moon.

This video says that Nasa says the moon is apparently hollow and rang like a bell for hours when the command module crashed into the moon. They also said that there are craters on the moon that are bottomless. They may be entrances to the inside.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgvecQhQTok

Haliburton: THEY WISH!!!

A physicist i worked with a few years ago and has since retired, went into an apoplectic fit when i asked what his thoughts were on the controversy surrounding sending man to the moon. As he was part of a team which designed and built a piece of equipment which apparently is still up on that big ole moon, i was inclined to believe his belief that it was real.

Same people who designed raindrops.

Astronomers now believe the moon has a similar core like earth.Which could mean the moon actually isn't remains of the earth and some other planet like mass colliding.This would mean the moon was formed kind of like the earth.

If its Moon Base Alpha from Space:1999 then it was probably built by a chap called Mat Irvine.. (yes, another useless fact of the day)..

I think many of the people involved in the moon trip hoax were completely fooled too and also believed that ship went to the moon. Watch the video and you will see how they did that.

I bet they cling to the belief rather than admit that they were fooled. Just like a religion.

That is one of several ideas. Believing something. I guess some people think that because they call themselves "astronomers" that their beliefs have more weight?

Point is...he believed he was part of something very real. I had no reason to doubt his sincerity when he expressed his disgust at the controversy so vehemently. Can you imagine what it must be like for people like him who believed they were a part of history in the making, only to have it all stripped away?

Right.

They would be very angry indeed.

As are a lot of people who get angry when you try to expose a lie.