I think many of the people involved in the moon trip hoax were completely fooled too and also believed that ship went to the moon. Watch the video and you will see how they did that.

I bet they cling to the belief rather than admit that they were fooled. Just like a religion.

That is one of several ideas. Believing something. I guess some people think that because they call themselves "astronomers" that their beliefs have more weight?

Right.

They would be very angry indeed.

As are a lot of people who get angry when you try to expose a lie.

thats the biggest bunch of nonsense any CT ever came up with... I can prove very easily that man has landed on the moon... can you prove they didn't?

Astronomers now believe the moon has a similar core like earth.Which could mean the moon actually isn't remains of the earth and some other planet like mass colliding.This would mean the moon was formed kind of like the earth.

The formation theory would combine a planet the size of Mars with the Earth and smash them together. More crust and less core would end up in the Moon giving it a smaller core and a thicker crust. This is what the seismic studies and gravity/density studies show. The collision would melt everything and allow the heavy metals to sink to the center, just like the Earth.

Both the Earth and Moon acquired mass from meteor bombardment later. There is NO evidence of the Moon being hollow.

It has already be proven that they didn't. You didn't watch the video apparently.

You are apparently one of those angry people who don't want to believe that you were fooled by the scam.

Moonquakes

Furthermore, shallow moonquakes lasted a remarkably long time. Once they got going, all continued more than 10 minutes. "The moon was ringing like a bell," Neal says.

On Earth, vibrations from quakes usually die away in only half a minute. The reason has to do with chemical weathering, Neal explains: "Water weakens stone, expanding the structure of different minerals. When energy propagates across such a compressible structure, it acts like a foam sponge—it deadens the vibrations." Even the biggest earthquakes stop shaking in less than 2 minutes.

The moon, however, is dry, cool and mostly rigid, like a chunk of stone or iron. So moonquakes set it vibrating like a tuning fork. Even if a moonquake isn't intense, "it just keeps going and going," Neal says. And for a lunar habitat, that persistence could be more significant than a moonquake's magnitude.

lol... just keep the CT's alive with your nonsense... by the way, how did the mirror that is on the moon that people here on earth use to bounce lasers off of to see how far the moon is going away from the earth get there? i guess it was just plain ole magic?

By a remote rover probably.

the only CT i can say might have been the cold fusion theory from Fleischmann and Pons,i think they were on to something but nuclear power corporations along with nuclear physicist played a big role in claiming their theory false.

(a book by Christopher Knight, Alan Butler---(Authors)

The moon was made in Wisconsin by master cheese crafters

This should add some more fuel to the artificial moon argument. Could this curious find be more proof our moon is not natural, but manufactured? Let this broaden your horizons.

Any way you look it, this has some remarkable information about our amazing Universe that’s unfolding before us.

*****

Nanoparticles found in moon glass bubbles explain weird lunar soil behaviour.

A stunning discovery by Queensland University of Technology soil scientist Marek Zbik of nanoparticles inside bubbles of glass in lunar soil could solve the mystery of why the moon’s surface topsoil has many unusual properties.

Dr Zbik, from Queensland University of Technology’s Science and Engineering Faculty, said scientists had long observed the strange behaviour of lunar soil but had not taken much notice of the nano and submicron particles found in the soil and their source was unknown.

Dr Zbik took the lunar soil samples to Taiwan where he could study the glass bubbles without breaking them using a new technique for studying nano materials call synchrotron-based nano tomography to look at the particles. Nano tomography is a transmission X-ray microscope which enables 3D images of nanoparticles to be made.

View a 3D image from inside the lunar bubble using transmission X-Ray microscopy. You can see what is inside the lunar bubble with 3D glasses.

“We were really surprised at what we found,” Dr Zbik said.

“Instead of gas or vapour inside the bubbles, which we would expect to find in such bubbles on Earth, the lunar glass bubbles were filled with a highly porous network of alien-looking glassy particles that span the bubbles’ interior.


“It appears that the nanoparticles are formed inside bubbles of molten rocks when meteorites hit the lunar surface. Then they are released when the glass bubbles are pulverised by the consequent bombardment of meteorites on the moon’s surface.

“This continuous pulverising of rocks on the lunar surface and constant mixing develop a type of soil which is unknown on Earth.”

Dr Zbik said nanoparticles behaved according to the laws of quantum physics which were completely different from so called ‘normal’ physics’ laws. Because of this, materials containing nanoparticles behave strangely according to our current understanding.

“Nanoparticles are so tiny, it is their size and not what they are made of that accounts for their exceptional properties.

“We don’t understand a lot about quantum physics yet but it could be that these nanoparticles, when liberated from their glass bubble, mix with the other soil constituents and give lunar soil its unusual properties.

“Lunar soil is electro-statically charged so it hovers above the surface; it is extremely chemically active; and it has low thermal conductivity eg it can be 160 degrees above the surface but -40 degrees two metres below the surface.

“It is also very sticky and brittle such that its particles wear the surface off metal and glass.” (Source)http://phys.org/news/2012-06-nanoparticles-moon-glass-weird-lunar.html

Ok . . . and why does this support the argument for a artificial moon?

And several astronauts worked really hard to bring those rocks back for study.