100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Government Actually Knows How To Build A Fence | |
|---|---|
|
|
 Wow, they just need to get one on the borders now that we know they know how to build them! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid? his family has owned that land since the civil war, the government took some of it over to protect some endangered turtles... the grandfather clause was in effect, the government was up to their usual liberal tricks and lies... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid? Wouldn't have a clue, would you? And it would be doubtful if you could grasp an answer as demonstrated by your statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid? his family has owned that land since the civil war, the government took some of it over to protect some endangered turtles... the grandfather clause was in effect, the government was up to their usual liberal tricks and lies... Even Cliven admits that he doesn't own the land. What he does own are the grazing and water rights and that is all he wants. He states the land belongs to the state of Nevada, specifically Clark County. He is willing to pay Clark County any fees they ask, but they keep refusing the fees, hence by law once refused, not owed. His objection and fight has always been the hijacking of the land by the federal government to come in and control the land and the people on the land. Can't have freedom now, can we. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid? his family has owned that land since the civil war, the government took some of it over to protect some endangered turtles... the grandfather clause was in effect, the government was up to their usual liberal tricks and lies... Even Cliven admits that he doesn't own the land. What he does own are the grazing and water rights and that is all he wants. He states the land belongs to the state of Nevada, specifically Clark County. He is willing to pay Clark County any fees they ask, but they keep refusing the fees, hence by law once refused, not owed. His objection and fight has always been the hijacking of the land by the federal government to come in and control the land and the people on the land. Can't have freedom now, can we. from what i understand, it was once his families land and they have been using that land since the civil war without any problems... till now... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid? his family has owned that land since the civil war, the government took some of it over to protect some endangered turtles... the grandfather clause was in effect, the government was up to their usual liberal tricks and lies... Even Cliven admits that he doesn't own the land. What he does own are the grazing and water rights and that is all he wants. He states the land belongs to the state of Nevada, specifically Clark County. He is willing to pay Clark County any fees they ask, but they keep refusing the fees, hence by law once refused, not owed. His objection and fight has always been the hijacking of the land by the federal government to come in and control the land and the people on the land. Can't have freedom now, can we. from what i understand, it was once his families land and they have been using that land since the civil war without any problems... till now... http://bastiat.mises.org/2014/04/im-ambivalent-on-the-bundy-ranch-case/ http://www.mises.org/daily/6723/Ranchers-and-Empire-in-the-American-West Or,Some People are more PUBLIC than Others! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Wed 04/16/14 12:04 PM
|
|
Is it a Ranch or federal land, used to feed privately-owned cattle while grazing fees weren't paid? his family has owned that land since the civil war, the government took some of it over to protect some endangered turtles... the grandfather clause was in effect, the government was up to their usual liberal tricks and lies... Even Cliven admits that he doesn't own the land. What he does own are the grazing and water rights and that is all he wants. He states the land belongs to the state of Nevada, specifically Clark County. He is willing to pay Clark County any fees they ask, but they keep refusing the fees, hence by law once refused, not owed. His objection and fight has always been the hijacking of the land by the federal government to come in and control the land and the people on the land. Can't have freedom now, can we. from what i understand, it was once his families land and they have been using that land since the civil war without any problems... till now... http://bastiat.mises.org/2014/04/im-ambivalent-on-the-bundy-ranch-case/ http://www.mises.org/daily/6723/Ranchers-and-Empire-in-the-American-West Or,Some People are more PUBLIC than Others! Didn't you post this leftist liberal socialist links yesterday in another thread, of course you did. Let's see, what would give one a hint, well the same one as yesterday: The conservative press has framed the story in a variety of ways, casting the story both as matter of outright federal seizure of private land, and as an absurd environmental crusade to save a tortoise from extinction. And of course, why have a trial, this unwise socialist Austrian organization just declares: The exact legal and historical details of the Bundy family’s case will emerge slowly over time, but even if the family is completely in the wrong legally (which it probably is)... Outstanding journalism. But then to follow up with... While those who are unfamiliar with land use in the West may see this as some sort of new dastardly deed on the part of the federal government, it is in fact the case that leasing federal land for grazing (among many other things) has been the status quo in the West for more than a century, and the federal government has owned at least 40 percent or more of the land in many Western states ever since it was annexed to the United States in the nineteenth century. In fact, the nation'��s 13 Western states are home to 93 percent of federal land, with two-thirds of all land in Utah, and 81 percent of all land in Nevada owned by the feds. Gee and to imagine that great statement in the face of: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;... Now just whom should we believe, an Austrian socialistic propaganda machine or the supreme law of the land. I choose Cliven Bundy and the constitution as the idiot author of the article hasn't a clue. And by the way, both links end up at the same article by the same idiot. |
|
|
|
|
