1 3 5 6 7 8 9 20 21
Topic: Is time travel possible?
no photo
Wed 11/05/14 06:09 AM

@ Metalwing.

I am wondering if you would consider having dreams which are predictive of future events which one has seen occur would be considered a form of time travel. In my opinion, it would make perfect sense although probably not able to be proven as scientific "fact". Just curious. What's your opinion?


There are many dimensions that are THEORETICALLY there by physics. They say they are folded over to reach one point to another instantly.

I have had a recurring dream for 6 continuous years before an horrific event in my life. It occurred just as I always dreamed.

dcastelmissy's photo
Wed 11/05/14 06:25 AM


@ Metalwing.

I am wondering if you would consider having dreams which are predictive of future events which one has seen occur would be considered a form of time travel. In my opinion, it would make perfect sense although probably not able to be proven as scientific "fact". Just curious. What's your opinion?


There are many dimensions that are THEORETICALLY there by physics. They say they are folded over to reach one point to another instantly.

I have had a recurring dream for 6 continuous years before an horrific event in my life. It occurred just as I always dreamed.


Yep me too but it was ten years from when I had the dream that the event occurred, also exactly as dreamed, which made me think the dreaming itself was a way of "time travelling". It's happened to me so many times, it got me wondering if it could be considered time travel. I think it's fascinating. Which brings me to another aspect...can we program our dreams to intentionally "time travel". My experience is that we can. Call me nuts if you will but I enjoy thinking about limitless possibilities, whether it is scientific fact or not. :tongue:

no photo
Wed 11/05/14 07:09 AM



@ Metalwing.

I am wondering if you would consider having dreams which are predictive of future events which one has seen occur would be considered a form of time travel. In my opinion, it would make perfect sense although probably not able to be proven as scientific "fact". Just curious. What's your opinion?


There are many dimensions that are THEORETICALLY there by physics. They say they are folded over to reach one point to another instantly.

I have had a recurring dream for 6 continuous years before an horrific event in my life. It occurred just as I always dreamed.


Yep me too but it was ten years from when I had the dream that the event occurred, also exactly as dreamed, which made me think the dreaming itself was a way of "time travelling". It's happened to me so many times, it got me wondering if it could be considered time travel. I think it's fascinating. Which brings me to another aspect...can we program our dreams to intentionally "time travel". My experience is that we can. Call me nuts if you will but I enjoy thinking about limitless possibilities, whether it is scientific fact or not. :tongue:

Certainly is room for wondering about it all. Great minds have pondered time travel and magic for eons.

Dodo_David's photo
Wed 11/05/14 02:16 PM
Edited by Dodo_David on Wed 11/05/14 02:20 PM
Two years ago, American actor Alan Alda challenged scientists to come up with a definition of "time" that could be understood by 11-year-old students.

Alda's challenge was the second Flame Challenge sponsored by the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science.
The winners of that contest were announced in 2013.

The winner of the 2nd contest's "written" category is Nicholas Williams, a retired scientist who spent 33 years working at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Here is how Williams defines "time".

Time has a lot of definitions; like time is history or time is age. But, have we ever considered a good definition? I have. Here'��s my definition. And no, I did not get this from some book or online. It'��s just something that makes sense to me. I think of time as Forward Movement.

Think about it! Everything moves forward, from the universe to every second of your life. And because everything moves forward, man developed a way to keep track of this Forward Movement and called it time. Man also invented clocks to keep a precise log of this Forward Movement in years, days, hours, minutes, seconds, and even parts of seconds.

I'��ll always continue to think of time as Forward Motion. I'��ll also think of it as a Forward Motion that will never change, will never stop, and can never be reversed.


The winner of the 2nd contest's "visual" category is Steve Maguire, a Ph.D. candidate in inorganic catalysis at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.

In his winning video, Maguire defines "time" is one of the four dimensions and coordinates of space-time.

One of the finalist's in the "visual" category is Dr. John Suchocki, an adjunct professor of chemistry and physics at Saint Michael's College in Colchester, Vermont.

In his video, Suchocki states that "time" is a measure of change. He also suggests that the flow of time could be an illusion.

* * * * * * *

I do not see any conflict between the definitions of "time" given by the above-mentioned scientists.

I will admit that the definition of "time" that I presented earlier is not correct, because "time" isn't specifically the measurement of the movement of celestial objects (although the definitions of "Year", "Day" and "Lunar Month" pertain to the movement of celestial objects).

Yet, the movement of celestial objects is a kind of forward movement that Nicholas Williams mentions, a kind of change that John Suchocki mentions, and celestial objects have space-time coordinates, as Steve Maguire mentions.

* * * * * * *

Now, does anyone here have a problem with the definitions of "time" given by the above-mentioned scientists?

Maxisu's photo
Wed 11/05/14 02:24 PM

Yes time travel is possibile, heres an example....this thread was posted in the past, its currently in the present and will be there in the future what


biggrin drinks

vegansoul's photo
Wed 11/05/14 09:58 PM

Two years ago, American actor Alan Alda challenged scientists to come up with a definition of "time" that could be understood by 11-year-old students.

Alda's challenge was the second Flame Challenge sponsored by the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science.
The winners of that contest were announced in 2013.

The winner of the 2nd contest's "written" category is Nicholas Williams, a retired scientist who spent 33 years working at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Here is how Williams defines "time".

Time has a lot of definitions; like time is history or time is age. But, have we ever considered a good definition? I have. Here'��s my definition. And no, I did not get this from some book or online. It'��s just something that makes sense to me. I think of time as Forward Movement.

Think about it! Everything moves forward, from the universe to every second of your life. And because everything moves forward, man developed a way to keep track of this Forward Movement and called it time. Man also invented clocks to keep a precise log of this Forward Movement in years, days, hours, minutes, seconds, and even parts of seconds.

I'��ll always continue to think of time as Forward Motion. I'��ll also think of it as a Forward Motion that will never change, will never stop, and can never be reversed.


The winner of the 2nd contest's "visual" category is Steve Maguire, a Ph.D. candidate in inorganic catalysis at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.

In his winning video, Maguire defines "time" is one of the four dimensions and coordinates of space-time.

One of the finalist's in the "visual" category is Dr. John Suchocki, an adjunct professor of chemistry and physics at Saint Michael's College in Colchester, Vermont.

In his video, Suchocki states that "time" is a measure of change. He also suggests that the flow of time could be an illusion.

* * * * * * *

I do not see any conflict between the definitions of "time" given by the above-mentioned scientists.

I will admit that the definition of "time" that I presented earlier is not correct, because "time" isn't specifically the measurement of the movement of celestial objects (although the definitions of "Year", "Day" and "Lunar Month" pertain to the movement of celestial objects).

Yet, the movement of celestial objects is a kind of forward movement that Nicholas Williams mentions, a kind of change that John Suchocki mentions, and celestial objects have space-time coordinates, as Steve Maguire mentions.

* * * * * * *

Now, does anyone here have a problem with the definitions of "time" given by the above-mentioned scientists?



Yes 'forward morion" sounds good; does the fact that changes have to always be in the direction of increasing entropy come into it also ? as we cannot totally reverse the effects of any previous change ?

metalwing's photo
Thu 11/06/14 07:18 AM
Mathematically speaking, time travel into the past is predicted to be possible by Einstein's theory of General Relativity. However, the "grandfather paradox" (meeting your parents or grandparents and stopping them from having you) seems to make it impractical on a large scale.

Scientists in Queensland think that it may be possible to do it on a quantum level.

'The properties of quantum particles are "fuzzy" or uncertain to start with, so this gives them enough wiggle room to avoid inconsistent time travel situations,' said professor Timothy Ralph, one of the researchers on the latest study.

The results also give a better understand to how two theories in physics, on the biggest and smallest scales, are able to relate to one another.

'The question of time travel features at the interface between two of our most successful yet incompatible physical theories ' Einstein's general relativity and quantum mechanics,' said PhD student Martin Ringbauer from the University of Queensland.

'Einstein's theory describes the world at the very large scale of stars and galaxies, while quantum mechanics is an excellent description of the world at the very small scale of atoms and molecules.'

Einstein's theory suggests the possibility of travelling backwards in time by following a space-time path that returns to the starting point in space but at an earlier time - a closed timelike curve (CTC).

This possibility has puzzled physicists and philosophers alike since it was discovered by Austrian-American scientist Kurt G�del in 1949, as it seems to cause paradoxes in the classical world.

These include the 'grandparents paradox', where a time traveller could stop their grandparents from meeting, thus preventing the time traveller's birth.

This would make it impossible for the time traveller to have set out in the first place.

But this new research suggests that such interactions might indeed be possible - albeit only on a quantum level.

Read more: //www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2665781/Could-time-travel-soon-reality-Physicists-simulate-quantum-light-particles-travelling-past-time.html#ixzz3IIjHUmxc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


"Could time travel soon become a reality? Physicists simulate sending quantum light particles into the past

University of Queensland scientists simulate photons moving through time
They showed how two wormhole-travelling photons might behave
Time-travel in the quantum world seems to avoid famous paradoxes
The experiment shows bizarre behaviour of such quantum particles
But on larger scales time travel still remains implausible, say researchers







no photo
Thu 11/06/14 09:16 AM
I don't know, but if there is, never travel economy because when you get to your destination your nose could be where you ear should be...laugh drinker

Dodo_David's photo
Thu 11/06/14 10:27 AM

Mathematically speaking, time travel into the past is predicted to be possible by Einstein's theory of General Relativity. However, the "grandfather paradox" (meeting your parents or grandparents and stopping them from having you) seems to make it impractical on a large scale.

Scientists in Queensland think that it may be possible to do it on a quantum level.

'The properties of quantum particles are "fuzzy" or uncertain to start with, so this gives them enough wiggle room to avoid inconsistent time travel situations,' said professor Timothy Ralph, one of the researchers on the latest study.

The results also give a better understand to how two theories in physics, on the biggest and smallest scales, are able to relate to one another.

'The question of time travel features at the interface between two of our most successful yet incompatible physical theories ' Einstein's general relativity and quantum mechanics,' said PhD student Martin Ringbauer from the University of Queensland.

'Einstein's theory describes the world at the very large scale of stars and galaxies, while quantum mechanics is an excellent description of the world at the very small scale of atoms and molecules.'

Einstein's theory suggests the possibility of travelling backwards in time by following a space-time path that returns to the starting point in space but at an earlier time - a closed timelike curve (CTC).

This possibility has puzzled physicists and philosophers alike since it was discovered by Austrian-American scientist Kurt G�del in 1949, as it seems to cause paradoxes in the classical world.

These include the 'grandparents paradox', where a time traveller could stop their grandparents from meeting, thus preventing the time traveller's birth.

This would make it impossible for the time traveller to have set out in the first place.

But this new research suggests that such interactions might indeed be possible - albeit only on a quantum level.

Read more: //www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2665781/Could-time-travel-soon-reality-Physicists-simulate-quantum-light-particles-travelling-past-time.html#ixzz3IIjHUmxc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


"Could time travel soon become a reality? Physicists simulate sending quantum light particles into the past

University of Queensland scientists simulate photons moving through time
They showed how two wormhole-travelling photons might behave
Time-travel in the quantum world seems to avoid famous paradoxes
The experiment shows bizarre behaviour of such quantum particles
But on larger scales time travel still remains implausible, say researchers





Uh, I suppose that someone could come up with a computer simulation for anything that has never been observed in real life.

no photo
Thu 11/06/14 11:33 AM
Absolutely not possible

Conrad_73's photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:09 PM

Absolutely not possible

Physicist?

no photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:24 PM
Even If you travel back in time 'the illuminati' will still be there frustrated

davidben1's photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:36 PM
since all mortals are experiencing a journey upon earths surface in a "body", it is only due to the chemical energy make up of the "current body", that the essence of self awareness is stamped with the present worlds "time stamp format" upon one self...

but when time restrictions are as released in the brain, awareness is free to travel outside of it's physical body that was once but "believed" to be restricted...

OPTION of time as accepted, be all that "create" time as a "unmovable" to the self...

the "self" can travel to many other worlds, where time be formatted upon many different scales, and the self can move forward, or reverse, and in any direction, following the wishes of the "self", no longer restricted by only the "body" of this present planet earth...

as a more fully developed entity be always being created by the ever more "moving forward" motion earth does induce, or just learning more, and so hence with more development being completed, new realms and powers become available, that were only on a precise timed release schedule to the "self"...

The "soul", one's self, is only tethered to the "body" subject to present earth "time", as long as one "believe" it self is it's BODY.

SELF is not the BODY.

the body is but a "clothing"...

the "body" is designed and formatted to earth "timing"...

the LOVE of one's own "body" be the only thing that KEEP the "self" in the body...

all are free to leave their body anytime they wish, and all just don't recognize that yet, or want to leave it.

but once the "self", leave the body, the format of the "old time stamp" of the "human body" is shattered in the mind of self...

then one will leave and return to it's body at will, leaving the body to travel to where such things are more better explained, hence then better to fully understand the powers of "self" above and beyond what it self once knew...

try it, you'll like it.

dcastelmissy's photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:38 PM

Even If you travel back in time 'the illuminati' will still be there frustrated


laugh laugh true but don't lose all hope! After all we've made it this far lol :tongue:

no photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:44 PM

since all mortals are experiencing a journey upon earths surface in a "body", it is only due to the chemical energy make up of the "current body", that the essence of self awareness is stamped with the present worlds "time stamp format" upon one self...

but when time restrictions are as released in the brain, awareness is free to travel outside of it's physical body that was once but "believed" to be restricted...

OPTION of time as accepted, be all that "create" time as a "unmovable" to the self...

the "self" can travel to many other worlds, where time be formatted upon many different scales, and the self can move forward, or reverse, and in any direction, following the wishes of the "self", no longer restricted by only the "body" of this present planet earth...

as a more fully developed entity be always being created by the ever more "moving forward" motion earth does induce, or just learning more, and so hence with more development being completed, new realms and powers become available, that were only on a precise timed release schedule to the "self"...

The "soul", one's self, is only tethered to the "body" subject to present earth "time", as long as one "believe" it self is it's BODY.

SELF is not the BODY.

the body is but a "clothing"...

the "body" is designed and formatted to earth "timing"...

the LOVE of one's own "body" be the only thing that KEEP the "self" in the body...

all are free to leave their body anytime they wish, and all just don't recognize that yet, or want to leave it.

but once the "self", leave the body, the format of the "old time stamp" of the "human body" is shattered in the mind of self...

then one will leave and return to it's body at will, leaving the body to travel to where such things are more better explained, hence then better to fully understand the powers of "self" above and beyond what it self once knew...

try it, you'll like it.






Are you saying 'the self' can time travel when dead spock

no photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:45 PM


Even If you travel back in time 'the illuminati' will still be there frustrated


laugh laugh true but don't lose all hope! After all we've made it this far lol :tongue:





surprised

davidben1's photo
Thu 11/06/14 12:56 PM
if one's most goal be to master the mind and time hence gaining total control over the SMALLER power the body, than one has the same goals of the illuminated ones of earth joined to uncover secrets of realms not yet unveiled, so hence would rather enjoy being amongst the "true illuminate" and no longer as naive fall prey to slanted data but put forth into the conscious streams of humankind for the sole purpose of keeping what exist now upon earth as the residing format of all systems that mankind doth toil under.


no photo
Thu 11/06/14 01:03 PM
Edited by unknown_romeo on Thu 11/06/14 01:08 PM
Sounds like meditation what

davidben1's photo
Thu 11/06/14 01:06 PM
one does not have to BE DEAD, to travel outside of it's body...

but one must surrender it's belief there exist "DEAD"...

dead is just self leaving the body, but no MIND ABILITY having ALREADY been developed to return AT WILL, BEFORE one LEFT it's "human body"...

but if one develops the MIND FIRST, than one can exist the body, and the "body" will rest in a "sleep like" state while one is gone from it, and one can return at will, yes.

it is a very precise "procedure", most not able to slow their brain enough, or their own thoughts enough, to STOP THINKING, to be able to be guided as to how to do it.


davidben1's photo
Thu 11/06/14 01:10 PM
it be wise to sea that any data streamed into the public consciousness through data delivery systems that if it be based upon a singular self interest than it is by design to discredit, deceive, blind, so direct one's opposition.

the illuminated sea none as their opposition, only all exist but to teach self how.

hence, data shall be different.

based upon agenda.

seaful eye's sea by words can spot the existence of self interest data and data of the good of all.

1 3 5 6 7 8 9 20 21