You are also ignoring the facts to suit your politics.

Unless the professors were working to prevent ANYONE ANYWHERE from teaching a class that did not fit their ideas, there was no suppression, and no need to "show all sides of the subject."

Since you apparently don't think logic applies to the working world, how about a school-based analogy?

If someone is teaching a course on how to best arm the military, should students taking that class be allowed to spend the bulk of the class time arguing that war is wrong, and that no weapons should be allowed anywhere? Just to make sure of "showing all sides"? I would say logically, no.

But apparently you would differ.

Well, you have to admit, no matter what your take on climate problems are, that this makes sense.

If the professors BASED THE ENTIRE CLASS on a certain premise, then allowing that premise to be debated will make the entire class impossible to proceed with.

It's classic old-style left-wing thinking, to declare as people here seem to be doing, that the students should be allowed to dictate the agenda of the courses they are taking, and that whatever the STUDENTS decide is true, is what has to be accepted.

You guys want to go down that "student run university" road you can, but I saw that approach fail every time it's been tried so far.

Besides, if everyone who disagrees with the premise DOES drop the class, and that proves to be the majority of students, the University will discontinue it.

He needs to get out of teaching.
It's obvious he has lost his passion to teach and learn.
It's amazing the knowledge students have.

and students have thousands of choices on what knowledge to expand, no one course or professor should expect to cover everyones beliefs on every topic,,,