"There has never been a man or a women - not me, not Bill, nobody - more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as the President of the United States of America" - Barack Obama speaking at the Democratic National Convention.

There he goes... the liar in chief is at it again: inverting reality and spouting some of the most transparent BS in modern history. The fact that Obama can stand up there and give such an outlandish endorsement of Killary is truly emblematic of his main strength: his ability to deceive.

Killary should be immediately disqualified from being eligible to run for President, considering the fact she had highly classified information on multiple unsecured private servers. Killary should be in jail, not running for the highest office in one of the most powerful countries on earth.

Even the thought of a Killary presidency should terrify everyone not only in the US, but everyone on the planet. Make no mistake about it: she is a neocon and a war hawk. Killary is not just a puppet of Wall Street, but of the military-industrial complex. She has received over $300,000 from war contractors in her presidential bid so far, the second highest amount (after Bernie Sanders) out of all the candidates who initially ran for President.

Killary was instrumental in NATO's 2011 war in Libya, which resulted in the ousting of Muammar al- Qaddafi and the complete destruction of Libya - a country that previously had the highest standard of living on the African continent. She famously remarked after Qaddafi was murdered that "we came, we saw, he died" (before demonically laughing). I would question the mental sanity of anyone who paraphrases Julius Caesar in such circumstances.

With Killary at the helm, we can expect the total escalation of the Syrian conflict in addition to the very real potential of war with Iran. Killary is also a zealous supporter of Israel (along with Trump), and we can expect the continued support for Israel's genocidal policies against the people of Palestine no matter who is elected.

Would the World Survive a Killary Presidency?

And now for the most dangerous aspect of a Killary administration: the very real danger of nuclear war with Russia. Although Vladimir Putin and the Russian leadership will try to work with Clinton in a bid to reduce tensions, her close relationship with the neocons and her warmongering attitude would most probably drive the world towards war.

In 2014, when referring to the Ukrainian conflict, Killary actually compared Putin to Hitler in one of the most disrespectful and ludicrous remarks that a Western politician has made in recent years. It becomes even more absurd when you consider the fact that the West overthrew the Ukrainian government, using and supporting neo-Nazis in the process.

A Clinton administration staffed with neocons and war hawks would continue the policy of encircling Russia, and of putting missile facilities in Eastern Europe. With tensions between NATO and Russia already great, the last thing the world needs is a Killary administration.

Putin: "The World is Being Pulled in an Irreversible Direction"

I will leave you with the warning Putin issued to foreign journalists at the end of the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum on the 17th of June, regarding how NATO and the US are driving the world towards nuclear war, yet the Western public is absolutely oblivious to this reality considering the complete blackout in the mainstream media:

"The Iranian threat does not exist but the NATO missile defense system is being positioned in Europe... Now the system is functioning and being loaded with missiles... So, these are being loaded with missiles that can penetrate territories within a 500km range; but we know that technologies advance, and we even know in which year the US will accomplish the next missile. This missile will be able to penetrate distances of up to 1000km, and then even further; and from that point on, they will start to directly threaten Russia's nuclear potential."

Putin continues:

"We know year by year what's going to happen, and they know that we know; it's only you [the journalists] that they tell tall-tales too and you buy it, and spread it to the citizens of your countries. Your people in turn do not feel the sense of impending danger - this is what worries me. How do you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction? While they pretend that nothing's going on. I don't know how to get through to you anymore."

Steven MacMillan is an independent writer, researcher, geopolitical analyst and editor of The Analyst Report, especially for the online magazine "New Eastern Outlook".

http://journal-neo.org/2016/09/07/there-has-never-been-anyone-less-qualified-than-killary-to-be-president/

I am still waiting for Putin to pick me up

Trump.
Too easy.

you libs are in for a surprise come November...hahahahaha ... i can't wait for trump to be prez! first order of business - undo all the dumbazzness the libtards did...

But Obamacare is working so wonderfully.

Hilary's asss is only being saved & backed by the extreme high powers...the illuminati & they're considering her as prez & very high chance she will be....BUT at any point they could turn their back on her & turn her from a hero to a zero

I know that the thrust of this thread is the usual biased political attacks on Clinton. Same repeated exaggerations and false statements and self-serving blather, not worth rehashing.

As for the title question itself, ignoring the anti-Hillary political intention of it, yes there have been many Presidential candidates, and a number of elected Presidents, who had far less preparation, experience, education, and functional competence as a political leader than Mrs Clinton.

George W. Bush had less preparation and experience before becoming President. George H.W. Bush had more. Reagan had much less. Carter had less. Nixon had more. Kennedy had less. Johnson had about the same.

I could go on, but since the point of the thread is the usual "lets have fun pretending that we know that Clinton is bad," that's plenty.

What makes a good President, or a good anything, isn't just what shows up on a resume. Carter had an excellent resume, with military experience, advanced education, and plenty of government experience, but was entirely unprepared to deal with the viciousness of the insiders of the national government at the time he was elected. Abraham Lincoln had a fairly weak resume, but did fairly well at some of the worst times the country went through.

amazing... the first three you mention bush, bush and reagan... who woulda thought it?

Regan and Bush II set this country back fifty years.

Valaris

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/06/us/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign.html?mtrref=undefined&_r=1&referer=http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/07/neverhillary-despite-bernie-sanderss-urging-die-hards-still-resist-clinton?cmpid=NL_foxnation/

yeppers,Vote Venezuela-Bernie!

*

http://imgur.com/gyrelt2
http://i.imgur.com/gyrelt2.gif

*