Topic: Trump won't concede
LittleLeftofRight's photo
Thu 10/27/16 07:55 AM
Edited by LittleLeftofRight on Thu 10/27/16 08:07 AM

LMAO

she is actually a subject in a federal investigation,,,



Oh yeh I forgot that the criminal Hillary was fired for unethical treatment of


Hillary Clinton Ex-Boss Says she is a “Liar” and “Unethical”.

Hillary Clinton’s ex-boss has accused her of being a “liar” and “unethical” during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry into Watergate.




Hillary was let go for unstated but obvious reasons, since employers cant fire someone and publically state the reason without being liable to suit.

Just what we need to make our laws!



now lets contrast Hillarys long history of lying about literally everything, failed policies, and 6 crininal investigations with trumps history

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwinpECzxoo







msharmony's photo
Thu 10/27/16 08:48 PM


LMAO

she is actually a subject in a federal investigation,,,



Oh yeh I forgot that the criminal Hillary was fired for unethical treatment of


Hillary Clinton Ex-Boss Says she is a “Liar” and “Unethical”.

Hillary Clinton’s ex-boss has accused her of being a “liar” and “unethical” during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry into Watergate.




Hillary was let go for unstated but obvious reasons, since employers cant fire someone and publically state the reason without being liable to suit.

Just what we need to make our laws!



now lets contrast Hillarys long history of lying about literally everything, failed policies, and 6 crininal investigations with trumps history

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwinpECzxoo


verify your information,,people can literally CLAIM anything on the web


this person was never her boss,,,so his story has no credibility and there is nothing verifying she was ever 'fired'

LittleLeftofRight's photo
Thu 10/27/16 11:03 PM
Edited by LittleLeftofRight on Thu 10/27/16 11:07 PM



LMAO

she is actually a subject in a federal investigation,,,



Oh yeh I forgot that the criminal Hillary was fired for unethical treatment of


Hillary Clinton Ex-Boss Says she is a “Liar” and “Unethical”.

Hillary Clinton’s ex-boss has accused her of being a “liar” and “unethical” during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry into Watergate.




Hillary was let go for unstated but obvious reasons, since employers cant fire someone and publically state the reason without being liable to suit.

Just what we need to make our laws!



now lets contrast Hillarys long history of lying about literally everything, failed policies, and 6 crininal investigations with trumps history

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwinpECzxoo




verify your information,,people can literally CLAIM anything on the web


this person was never her boss,,,so his story has no credibility and there is nothing verifying she was ever 'fired'


based upon the evidence there is a much higher probability that she was fired than that she was not fired.

It also has nothing to do with his credibility, that is faulty reasoning of deductive fallacy. Sinply put the ends do not match the means.

there is no need, I dont verify what one quick click on google will bring out hundreds of pages, take your pick.



msharmony's photo
Fri 10/28/16 02:37 AM
the rules of evidence prove more of a likelihood that she was fired?

what evidence would that be?


how, if her job was to counsel on whether to impeach Nixon, and he resigned on August 9th,,,was she paid until early September,, the same time that any other counsel members received their final check?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/09/06/the-zombie-claim-that-hillary-clinton-was-fired-during-the-watergate-inquiry/

credibility has everything to do with how 'likely' information is to be true,, when the information about the source itself is false





no photo
Fri 10/28/16 07:15 AM

Anyone else noticed that they are making a HUGE deal over that? You have to wonder why... if the dems don't plan on stealing it, then what's the big deal? Also they didn't ask Hillary that same question? Kinda makes you wonder


In the beginning he said ' I won't back down '  :sunglasses:
(Lots of articles on his requote & 2 threads).

IF, by some (suspicions), reason we HEAR, he has *cough* lost. His losing..:wink:. will be suspicions in itself.
 He will contest it as other Presidential candidates have.


no photo
Fri 10/28/16 07:25 AM
Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers - I Won't Back Down
http://youtu.be/k2h9HPZhqHE/

Johnny Cash - I Won' t Back Down: http://youtu.be/yUQCmDfKFac/


msharmony's photo
Fri 10/28/16 10:55 AM


Anyone else noticed that they are making a HUGE deal over that? You have to wonder why... if the dems don't plan on stealing it, then what's the big deal? Also they didn't ask Hillary that same question? Kinda makes you wonder


In the beginning he said ' I won't back down '  :sunglasses:
(Lots of articles on his requote & 2 threads).

IF, by some (suspicions), reason we HEAR, he has *cough* lost. His losing..:wink:. will be suspicions in itself.
 He will contest it as other Presidential candidates have.




some of the reasons Trump may lose and it wont be suspicious at all


1. the way he talks about women (a demographic making half the US population)

2. the way he has talked about mexicans (hispanics and latinos are 17 percent of population)

3. the way he has condescended to blacks, flaming fans by retweeting false information about their killing whites and condescending to them by saying they should give him his vote simply because they have nothing to lose

and the biggy, the allegations of sexual harassment,,,women are a HUGE portion of voting public and Cosbys career went down fast and turned him overnight to an outcast because of women alleging a sexual crime,,,,


He was in the game,,when mexicans and muslims were his main targets,,,but the sharp drop in numbers since women started seeming like his target,,,,,would make it suspicious if he WON


no photo
Fri 10/28/16 03:41 PM
laugh MsH, Trump is NOTHING like Cosby


Maybe? surprised

msharmony's photo
Fri 10/28/16 04:08 PM

laugh MsH, Trump is NOTHING like Cosby


Maybe? surprised


the only difference is in the level of offense

BOTH Cosby and Trump admitted to doing something questionable

for Cosby, giving drugs to women for sex
for Trump, using his position and power for groping women without consent

AND

BOTH Cosby and Trump had a number of women come forward to accuse them of offenses involving JUST those things


for Cosby, it was giving drugs them before having sex without consent
for Trump, it was groping them without consent


the former is rape
the latter is sexual harassment



different levels, but both easily career enders

no photo
Fri 10/28/16 05:32 PM
No, Cosby played the good fellow, drugged his victims to rape them.

The worst Trump has done is grab someones azz and kissed them?


The severity of both is evident yet you defended Cosby and his actions, Trump, not so much lol... You're usually pretty consistent but this one baffles me a bit.



Let's not compare them, they're worlds apart IMO

msharmony's photo
Fri 10/28/16 05:48 PM
Edited by msharmony on Fri 10/28/16 05:51 PM

No, Cosby played the good fellow, drugged his victims to rape them.

The worst Trump has done is grab someones azz and kissed them?


The severity of both is evident yet you defended Cosby and his actions, Trump, not so much lol... You're usually pretty consistent but this one baffles me a bit.



Let's not compare them, they're worlds apart IMO



exactly, Cosby is accused and convicted in the public eye based upon one statement and a number of allegations

Trump is accused (time will tell if he is likewise convicted in the public eye) based upon his OWN public behavior and recorded statement of groping people without consent

such behavior may not be a big deal to you, but to most women, someone groping or kissing them without permission, especially someone in authority, is sexual harassment and not brushed off so lightly

I actually said of both that I dont believe allegations means guilt and that women can lie,,,but I also am observing the PATTERN in the public eye with these things where the immediate consensus is guilt based mostly on a cumulating number of women and outcast status that apparently follows,, if Cosby is any indication,,,


no photo
Fri 10/28/16 06:44 PM
you'd vote for Cosby if he was running against Trump admit it laugh flowerforyou

msharmony's photo
Fri 10/28/16 06:49 PM
no,, he can hardly get around anymore,, literally not 'fit' enough to handle the pressure and stamina of the position

I wouldnt vote,,,both choices would seem like potential catastrophe

msharmony's photo
Fri 10/28/16 08:26 PM
Edited by msharmony on Fri 10/28/16 08:36 PM
alleged criminal


digging and nitpicking every thing Trump ever did would no doubt feed into allegations of 'crime' as well

my vote for Hilary,, who is far from perfect but shown a longstanding tendency of actually CARING About others besides only herself is

no less christian than voting for a 70 year old man who carries himself and treats people the way he does and does nothing for anyone that doesnt involve being able to boast about how great he is or point fingers about how awful someone else is, who can only ever accept credit and always passes responsibility when things dont go his way,,,,





soufiehere's photo
Sat 10/29/16 07:46 AM
Edited for disparaging other member's opinions.

soufie
Site Moderator

Conrad_73's photo
Sat 10/29/16 08:12 AM
why should he concede,with the obvious Skulduggery being perpetrated by the DNC,until he has verified that he's lost the Election?
Anyone remember OwlGore ca. year 2000,Florida?laugh

IgorFrankensteen's photo
Sat 10/29/16 08:19 AM

why should he concede,with the obvious Skulduggery being perpetrated by the DNC,until he has verified that he's lost the Election?
Anyone remember OwlGore ca. year 2000,Florida?laugh


No, because no such cartoon character existed.

We never did find out who won the actual 2000 election. We only know who was NAMED the winner.

Conrad_73's photo
Sat 10/29/16 08:33 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Sat 10/29/16 08:47 AM


why should he concede,with the obvious Skulduggery being perpetrated by the DNC,until he has verified that he's lost the Election?
Anyone remember OwlGore ca. year 2000,Florida?laugh


No, because no such cartoon character existed.

We never did find out who won the actual 2000 election. We only know who was NAMED the winner.

they,the Press did a recount way after,and came to the conclusion that Bush won it after all!

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/01/the-florida-recount-of-2000/

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/us/examining-vote-overview-study-disputed-florida-ballots-finds-justices-did-not.html

To make a long Story short,the Apostle of Global Warming,OwlGore,lost to GWB!

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/29/16 12:18 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/29/16 12:20 PM
Gore didn't contest ahead of time, he contested when he learned he lost by not even one percent of votes cast,,, an amount small enough to make a huge difference if a state with 29 electoral votes (florida) did not properly count their ballots,,,,,the difference in that state was the difference for the whole election


I have a feeling that if Trump loses,, whatever amount its by, he will plant the seed in media(which is a skill he has that his followers line up behind) that a state or two(the ones that have the same amount of votes he lost by) 'rigged' the election


I am no fortune teller,, but I really feel he wont prove me wrong

not just a loser but a sore one too
a crybaby/bully that some people feel makes 'leader' material

Rooster35's photo
Tue 11/01/16 05:13 AM





Trump is giving cold sweats to the Establishment, the Globalists and the Left by showing them that the American people know what's up and that their shenanigans will not go unpunished if he's elected.
I respect him for that.