Community > Posts By > Lordling

 
Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 10:10 PM
I know you'd have gone insane if you saw what I saw...

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 10:04 PM
I can laugh at the wind
I can howl at the rain
Down in the canyon or out on the plains

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 09:59 PM
Out of winter came a warhorse of steel
I've never killed a woman before
But I know how it feels

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 09:57 PM

Traffic....I`m a Man


Iron Maiden - Women in Uniform

(there...yours works now Chevy)bigsmile

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 09:43 PM

i guess no one knew that one

lets keep this thread going though so....

beautiful..beautiful..girl from the north
you burn my heart with a flickering torch
i had a dream that noone else could see
you gave me love....for...free


Candy - Iggy Pop

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 09:09 PM

your experience is showing, cyber-boy drinker

i have also marvelled at the astounding number of
genuinely wonderful people who come out of the
woodwork around here. personally i believe that sites
such as jsh may be part of a new period of easier
human interaction - hopefully intelligent and rewarding
communication - for the most part.

sometimes it can be like a coffeehouse except it is
easier to approach someone new through the computer
and there are less distractions and almost no inhibitions
if it is done right.

it will be interesting to see how this form of interaction
evolves. but Asimov may have foretold it all on Aurora.

Lex's experience notwithstanding, i have found my last two
significant relationships with the help of online communication and so i'd say - no, there is nothing wrong here...it's working for us for the most part. if you find half as many fantastic people on here as i have then 1) i'll be surprised that you haven't found more and 2) you will have a great amount of fun here...

excellent post btw, and, welcome to jsh


Thank you for the warm reception and your observations. I have high hopes in regard.
drinker

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 09:06 PM


Long distance relationships are more a problem of the present than the past. It was not uncommon at all for couples to not see each other for years a while ago.

Maybe we have lost some of the values of what people had long ago.

So true, and you would think this would have been far better in these days of modern communications, cheaper airline tickets, and now you can even be in touch to someone's computer whilst you are on a mobile phone. Or maybe we are being too picky?


Good point. Although, perhaps not so much "picky" as "selective"? I believe that many of us may be adversely reacting to having "settled" in the past. Compromise on minor issues is one thing, but conflict with core values always comes home to roost, does it not?

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 09:02 PM

I think its because a lot of people arent willing to do the whole long distant relationship thing. I for one am willing. Why not take a chance with someone, even if they live so far away?


I agree wholeheartedly! drinker

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 08:59 PM

A few of the problems I've noticed:

1.) There's often a distance issue. I've noticed that practically all of the people I correspond with here are very far away. The locals won't talk to me at all. And I've had bad experiences with long-distance realtionships in the past, so I was not looking for another predictable LDR train wreck.

2.) Some people have unrealistic expectations, myself included. When I first signed up here (and on the other 9822 dating sites I've tried), I was hoping to meet someone who didn't drink and didn't have kids. As far as I can tell, no such person exists here. I was lucky in that I ended up getting back together with my ex, who did fit all of my required criteria!

3.) Horror stories and bad past relationships have made some people so paranoid that they'll sign up on dating sites but never really let anyone get to know them. They like the idea of the attention, but only so long as it's "safe."

4.) There is a perception that people on dating sites are "desperate" (this is gradually dissipating, but you'll still see the odd question like: "Would you admit to your friends and family that you met your significant other on a dating site?" -- the stigma is lessening, but it still exists) and this draws predatory types who like to prey on the "desperate" (or those they perceive as such)....which feeds into #3 above.

5.) A huge percentage of people on dating sites are rude, immature, and confrontational, thereby making the whole experience less palatable than it could be for many, and driving away a significant number of the more decent people.

6.) A huge percentage of people on dating sites simply don't have the communication and/or writing skills to create an effective profile or meaningful (or even comprehensible) e-mail/IM correspondence.

7.) For many people, on line dating is simply less effective than more traditional methods.

8.) I've seen a lot of people who seem to only use on line dating as a sort of "interim strategy" when they're between real-world entanglements. It fills in the gap, so to speak. Once they find another real-life person, the sites go on the back burner. JSH is a little different because of its "community" aspect, which keeps people coming back; but, on most sites I've been on, it's not uncommon for someone to disappear for several months, then show up again and say, "I'm back, it didn't work out," and pick up right where they left off. So there is still this idea that dating sites are a "lesser form."

I'm sure there are other issues, as well, and everyone's situation is different. These are just some of my thoughts and observations accumulated over several years.



Thanks, Lex...All very good points! This, despite the fact that this medium should never be relied upon as a substitute for a RL relationship. It should, however, be leveraged as a way to broaden your exposure to many more people than you would ever hope to meet through person to person contact. Find them here, but take the steps to meet & progress once you do. In regard to LDR's, personally, I would be happy to find someone compatible on this planet, ecstatic if within 500 miles, euphoric if closer.

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 07:03 PM
Online dating is soon to be a billion dollar a year market, with a presence of over 1,000 catalogued dating and/or lifestyle sites.

After 5 long years of exploring the ( 15 or so) most popular dating sites in the world, I must admit that I am totally perplexed and mystified as to why many of us are still alone.

So many (87.7%) are caring, happy, easy to get along with, good listeners, laid back, down to earth, real, fun, love to laugh, love to smile, simple, affectionate, uncomplicated, as comfortable in an evening gown/tux as jeans, outgoing, & honest, that it boggles the mind that the inevitable matches have not put the online dating industry out of business.

Speaking for myself, I know why I'm still alone. My profile speaks for itself, and I respectfully acknowledge those few others that are in similar situations.

So is the majority full of it, or is there something intrinsically wrong here?

Anyone?

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 03:56 PM


Regardless to the plethia of information provided here by others. Religions are a major reason for war. Religions do not want you to believe it but they are. And even if it was not out right war, religions have caused a lot of blood on the ground throughout history and still to this day.


How can religion be more of a factor than the underlying circumstances? Religion is also a major reason for people feeding the poor, respect, and non violent resistance. As I said before religion is never the reason but an excuse, even between Palestine & Isreal.

As for Islam, someone who's never read the Qu'ran pretends to know an awful lot about Islam and what the Qu'ran says, but the truth is Salam;^]


Because religions are, have always been, and will always be, the most convenient, reliable vehicle for trundling ourselves off to war. They are the line in the sand, the delineation between cultures. They say, "you are different", they say, "you are wrong". They are consistently used by governments to exacerbate tension, and to rally cultures to armed violence in the name of one deity or another, and, throughout history, they have accomplished their role in an extremely efficient manner. Religions exist for one purpose, and one purpose only, and that is to CONTROL human beings. Religions are MAN-MADE. Even if the spiritual philosophy of an organised religion is basically beneficent, it will be warped, misinterpreted, redirected & manipulated by MEN, for their own purposes.

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 02:48 PM

thank you so very much mirror....

i really appreciate your comment here

i try to be kind and practice courtesy and diplomacy ...
but i have never professed perfection in me, ever ...

it seems that many people who do not profess Christianity
are under the impression that Christians are supposed to be perfect....but that is soooo far from the case.....
we are not perfect...
we are forgiven by the shed Blood of Jesus

i certainly did not mean to offend anyone
by that joke....absolutely no one....
it was sent to me via email
i had no idea it would get such a reaction....


some people seem to come out of the woodwork
to attack things i say ...
they don't really know me,
and i don't really know them
and things get blown out of proportion....

i don't feel that i go seeking after others
to find ways to criticize their beliefs...

but i do see many people
who do not profess God to be walking around
with tombstones in their eyes....:cry:

i try to enlighten and to love and to bring hope :heart:
and purpose to those who are searching endlessly
and don't even know what or who they are looking for

i know many people who don't believe in God,

and i love them anyway ....
i have sent messages to one person on a thread,

and then i get slammed with criticism
because the message was misunderstood
and some people take personally what i say
& it gets completely blown out of proportion

and i felt like everything i was saying
was being misconstrued soooo..
perhaps you could understand
a bit of my dilemma flowerforyou



This, as well as your previous postings, resembles some form of bizarre spiritual haiku...I'm not sure why, but I can't help but like it.
:smile:

I certainly would never criticize anyone communicating a clear message of peace, love, harmony & understanding, while not offending anyone in any way.

As for the joke, it was clever & mildly amusing, but clearly a denigration toward those not of the Judaeo-Christian persuasion.

Nevertheless, with that exception noted, I've enjoyed all the rest of your comments.

Go Rapunzel! :wink:

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 12:17 AM

Pretty funny Lording.

Check this out.

Starship Troopers Propaganda:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtoffvEhNkg


Ahhh yes! "Do you want to know more?"
And my personal favorite, "Service Guarantees Citizenship!!".

Lordling's photo
Sat 01/19/08 12:08 AM




OOOOk this is really embarrassing so don't make fun of me.

So, we all know, sex before marriage is sin, but, what about masterbation? I can't find anything in the Bible that says you can't touch yourself. Is masterbation a sin? If it's not, then what about thinking about someone else while you do it? Is that a sin?

I'm serious, so no joking.





Two things.

1) Lust is a sin. If you can masturbate without feeling lust, then go to point 2.

2) Romans 14:23 "But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because this is not from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin."

If you have questions in your heart if something is a sin or not, then it is a sin. If you think "Maybe God will get mad if I do this" and do it anyways, then that tells God that there are things of this world that are more important to you than God. It doesn't matter if it's something that isn't a sin, if you do something and believe you might be sinning, then you are.


I found this to be enlightening (bibletruths.net):

...the twisting of Paul's teaching in Romans 14 to be inclusive of doctrinal and moral deviations is not simply error or an error, it is error that allows all error and forbids any and all challenge. Once the floodgate is allowed to be opened, we have no right attempting to pick and choose which false doctrines we will allow or reject, such is the height of hypocrisy (many are guilty of this). The key is to keep the floodgates tightly and securely closed!


Logic from a Christian that actually makes sense to me and I'm not even religious, much less a Christian.
:wink:


What he's talking about is further up in Romans 14. Christians are taught to not fight over doctrine. The authors point is that someone who is doing false teachings isn't covered by Romans 14. If someone teaches that Jesus wasn't God, a Christian is called upon to challenge that teaching. I agree with that author completely, but it has nothing to do with anything else that has been posted in this thread. Perhaps another example of you feeling the need to get in shots even when they do nothing to further the conversation...just so long as you can feel like you "won".


Not true; I merely wanted to point out that the scripture which you quoted to support your advice was not the best choice, as the summary of the article specifically draws attention to Romans 14:22-23, and emphasizes that it should not apply to doctrinal or moral deviations (apropos of the OP). Your very use of the quote constituted "false teaching", which I promptly brought to your attention.

I was not always non-religious, you know. Quite the devotee actually. You seem to judge people swiftly as well as harshly. Not a winning combination.

I hope you find enlightenment, and peace.

Good night.

Lordling's photo
Fri 01/18/08 11:42 PM




Jewish And Catholic .... Half and Half


How is that even possible??


Jewish by birth, yet Catholic by faith?


One cannot be both Jewish and Catholic at the same time.... It is like being a meat eating vegitarian....WTF???


One is Jewish by birth, not choice. One who is not Jewish may elect to convert to Judaism as a faith. Being Jewish is not a faith, per se.
Thankee sai!

Lordling's photo
Fri 01/18/08 11:35 PM


Regardless to the plethia of information provided here by others. Religions are a major reason for war. Religions do not want you to believe it but they are. And even if it was not out right war, religions have caused a lot of blood on the ground throughout history and still to this day.


Religions are often used as an excuse for war or bloodshed, but you really have to look at the teachings of a religion to judge if the religion incites violence or if the religion was used as an excuse for violence.


Sort of like the way the United States was founded as a model for freedom, truth, justice, tolerance, and moral conduct, and what our government really does is swiftly crush our own indigenous peoples and then follow up with 2nd/3rd world countries, appropriating their land, draining them of resources and dignity just to support it's runaway military-industrial complex?
They hate us for our freedom!!!

Lordling's photo
Fri 01/18/08 11:22 PM


OOOOk this is really embarrassing so don't make fun of me.

So, we all know, sex before marriage is sin, but, what about masterbation? I can't find anything in the Bible that says you can't touch yourself. Is masterbation a sin? If it's not, then what about thinking about someone else while you do it? Is that a sin?

I'm serious, so no joking.





Two things.

1) Lust is a sin. If you can masturbate without feeling lust, then go to point 2.

2) Romans 14:23 "But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because this is not from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin."

If you have questions in your heart if something is a sin or not, then it is a sin. If you think "Maybe God will get mad if I do this" and do it anyways, then that tells God that there are things of this world that are more important to you than God. It doesn't matter if it's something that isn't a sin, if you do something and believe you might be sinning, then you are.


I found this to be enlightening (bibletruths.net):

...the twisting of Paul's teaching in Romans 14 to be inclusive of doctrinal and moral deviations is not simply error or an error, it is error that allows all error and forbids any and all challenge. Once the floodgate is allowed to be opened, we have no right attempting to pick and choose which false doctrines we will allow or reject, such is the height of hypocrisy (many are guilty of this). The key is to keep the floodgates tightly and securely closed!


Logic from a Christian that actually makes sense to me and I'm not even religious, much less a Christian.
:wink:

Lordling's photo
Fri 01/18/08 10:58 PM

Well I just do not think a person can lay down and masterbate to the glory of the Lord.


Now there's a mental image for you....Puts a whole new spin on "Holy Roller".
laugh

Lordling's photo
Fri 01/18/08 10:52 PM


Jewish And Catholic .... Half and Half


How is that even possible??


Jewish by birth, yet Catholic by faith?

Lordling's photo
Fri 01/18/08 10:22 PM

Lording,

That looks like an excerpt
from 1984 by George Orwell.


Aye..The SparkNote version, in response to some earlier posts about who we're fighting, when & why. You know, we even have our very own Ministry of Truth now: The Office of Strategic Influence.
For some grim, yet apropos humor, Google "Ministry of Homeland Security".

1 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 Next