Topic: Throw out the electoral college... | |
---|---|
Edited by
wiley
on
Wed 09/03/08 05:16 PM
|
|
Why the electoral college is an antiquated relic that should be done away with...
http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_history.php In order to appreciate the reasons for the Electoral College, it is essential to understand its historical context and the problem that the Founding Fathers were trying to solve. They faced the difficult question of how to elect a president in a nation that: * was composed of thirteen large and small States jealous of their own rights and powers and suspicious of any central national government * contained only 4,000,000 people spread up and down a thousand miles of Atlantic seaboard barely connected by transportation or communication (so that national campaigns were impractical even if they had been thought desirable) * believed, under the influence of such British political thinkers as Henry St. John Bolingbroke, that political parties were mischievous if not downright evil, and * felt that gentlemen should not campaign for public office (The saying was "The office should seek the man, the man should not seek the office."). Boy have times changed, huh? * * A third idea was to have the president elected by a direct popular vote. Direct election was rejected not because the Framers of the Constitution doubted public intelligence but rather because they feared that without sufficient information about candidates from outside their State, people would naturally vote for a "favorite son" from their own State or region. At worst, no president would emerge with a popular majority sufficient to govern the whole country. At best, the choice of president would always be decided by the largest, most populous States with little regard for the smaller ones. Times have changed a lot since the conception of the electoral college. Transportation and communication are no longer issues. And with the internet and other media, getting information about a candidate (from outside of their State) is no longer an issue either. The original idea was for the most knowledgeable and informed individuals from each State to select the president based solely on merit and without regard to State of origin or political party. Somehow I don't think this even applies anymore. http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...q.html#process Is my vote for President and Vice President meaningful in the Electoral College system? Yes, within your State your vote has a great deal of significance. Under the Electoral College system, we do not elect the President and Vice President through a direct nation-wide vote. The Presidential election is decided by the combined results of 51 State elections (in this context, the term "State" includes DC). It is possible that an elector could ignore the results of the popular vote, but that occurs very rarely. Your vote helps decide which candidate receives your State's electoral votes.
The founders of the nation devised the Electoral College system as part of their plan to share power between the States and the national government. Under the Federal system adopted in the U.S. Constitution, the nation-wide popular vote has no legal significance. As a result, it is possible that the electoral votes awarded on the basis of State elections could produce a different result than the nation-wide popular vote. Nevertheless, the individual citizen's vote is important to the outcome of each State election. Yeah... every vote counts... even though it has no legal significance and can be overridden by your state's elector. |
|
|
|
I disagree with completely scrapping the electoral college. I beleive it does still serve to protect the interests of states with smaller populations.
|
|
|
|
one person, one vote...over here majority wins..a clear majority..if there is none then they start the whole process all over again..sure its a pain. but worth it...one person, one vote...
|
|
|
|
Edited by
quiet_2008
on
Wed 09/03/08 07:34 PM
|
|
The whole point of the Electoral system is to maintain autonomy of States rights. The Constitution doesnt say the people get to vote. It says the states will provide Electors in a manner of their choosing. The 50 States are electing the President not a popular vote
At least that was the reason they put it in there |
|
|