Topic: My, those on the left are not gonna like this. | |
---|---|
As we say in geometric proofs. "it's obvious". Your comments were so exaggerated, satirical, and inflammatory as to demand no legitimate consideration. I consider myself to be a logical thinker, I like to go beyond propaganda and rhetoric, the fact that I opened the door for you to at least show me where I was wrong and all you could come up with is "It's obvious" then attacked my positions tells me that you actually couldn't answer the question. If you were a logical thinker you would see where your comments didn't deserve argument. For instance, if you were to have said that the Dem platform was pro-choice, then that's arguable. Arguing whether Democrats think everyone should have an abortion is just silly because it's ludicrous. And that is the part that is obvious. Well, at least theres more than just some broad, all encompassing statement, this we can work with. First, to attack me is very lame, what are you taking pages out of the NeoCons book? That just shows me exactly how thin the lines are between liberals and NeoCons. Next, you obviously didn't notice that I didn't write those statements, I simply brought them here to be discussed and debated, you're the only one who's really decided to attribute them to me, I don't know what to tell you about that, that's your own hang up. I think I've already made it clear that there are some who make it seem like if a woman wants to hit the bar, have some unprotected sex,then she gets to hit the flush button on her uterus, which is what Roe V. Wade insures. I think thats simply wrong, in my own little opinion it's also immoral and it's a cop out for taking personal responsibility. To defend, in its entirety, the termination of 50 million developing lives bothers me every bit as defending the dropping of untold amounts of armament on defenseless Muslims. |
|
|
|
Well, at least theres more than just some broad, all encompassing statement, this we can work with. First, to attack me is very lame, what are you taking pages out of the NeoCons book? That just shows me exactly how thin the lines are between liberals and NeoCons. Next, you obviously didn't notice that I didn't write those statements, I simply brought them here to be discussed and debated, you're the only one who's really decided to attribute them to me, I don't know what to tell you about that, that's your own hang up. I think I've already made it clear that there are some who make it seem like if a woman wants to hit the bar, have some unprotected sex,then she gets to hit the flush button on her uterus, which is what Roe V. Wade insures. I think thats simply wrong, in my own little opinion it's also immoral and it's a cop out for taking personal responsibility. To defend, in its entirety, the termination of 50 million developing lives bothers me every bit as defending the dropping of untold amounts of armament on defenseless Muslims. I did go back and read your OP and you are correct... I did attribute the summarization to you, not to the article. And if the summarization isn't yours, then I do apologize. Sincerely. Not a hang up. It was the way it read to me. |
|
|
|
I wasn't sure, Neocons tend to twist things the same way, so I wanted to be sure.
We are cool, no problem, I just try as hard as I can to make it about issues, but, as you can see, have no problem wading into the trenches! At the very least, I'm using my powers for the forces of good! I want to get all the issues out, debate the merit of them and poke around on both sides to see exactly where the truth is and where the crap is. Especially since there is so much crap these days. ![]() |
|
|
|
I wasn't sure, Neocons tend to twist things the same way, so I wanted to be sure. We are cool, no problem, I just try as hard as I can to make it about issues, but, as you can see, have no problem wading into the trenches! At the very least, I'm using my powers for the forces of good! I want to get all the issues out, debate the merit of them and poke around on both sides to see exactly where the truth is and where the crap is. Especially since there is so much crap these days. ![]() Sadly it's mostly crap. The fringes are not only vocal, they're dishonest and unreasonable. I usually don't participate in the debates for that reason.... the few that are passionate enough to read and post are not open to re-evaluation anyhow. But I do like to read and call BS once in a while. Missed the boat on this one though... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Hey, what're ya gonna do, everyone's fallible.
What you've ran into with me is a real conservative, who is fed up with the fake crap thats being presented as Conservatism these days. I also think that alot of the Dems are being taken for a ride too, thats why I try to put everything on the table for real discussion. I advise everyone who comes into this section of the board give it a try! LOL! I think everyone has their mindset and most aren't open for reevaluation, but I'm not that guy, if I'm just flat wrong, then I'm just flat wrong. I just hope that doesn't start happening on a regular basis, or I'll have to start posting somewhere a little more fluffy, if you know what I'm saying! ![]() |
|
|