100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Debates | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
While I was watching the debate last night, I started remembering a debate I saw when I was in school where all candidates from all parties was in the debate.
Who is singling out the two parties only for debates? Shouldn't we as voters be demanding we hear from all candidates of all parties for the debates? There is far more parties than just two. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Drivinmenutz
on
Sat 09/27/08 10:03 PM
|
|
While I was watching the debate last night, I started remembering a debate I saw when I was in school where all candidates from all parties was in the debate. Who is singling out the two parties only for debates? Shouldn't we as voters be demanding we hear from all candidates of all parties for the debates? There is far more parties than just two.
Yes indeedie... unfortunately the two parties teamed up to make it harder for other parties to be heard. Means more power to the republicrats. They are attempting to put blindfolds over our faces... The truth is a third party candidate has a chance at bringing up the real issues we are facing, and that would make both the other candidates look REALLY bad... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While I was watching the debate last night, I started remembering a debate I saw when I was in school where all candidates from all parties was in the debate. Who is singling out the two parties only for debates? Shouldn't we as voters be demanding we hear from all candidates of all parties for the debates? There is far more parties than just two.
Yes indeedie... unfortunately the two parties teamed up to make it harder for other parties to be heard. Means more power to the republicrats. They are attempting to put blindfolds over our faces... We can change that. It is not beyond our control. We can demand it. I am going to start writing letters. This should be a priority for all voters so we can hear them all in one place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believe they've removed the third party canidates...not entirely sure, but that is what I've read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While I was watching the debate last night, I started remembering a debate I saw when I was in school where all candidates from all parties was in the debate. Who is singling out the two parties only for debates? Shouldn't we as voters be demanding we hear from all candidates of all parties for the debates? There is far more parties than just two.
Yes indeedie... unfortunately the two parties teamed up to make it harder for other parties to be heard. Means more power to the republicrats. They are attempting to put blindfolds over our faces... We can change that. It is not beyond our control. We can demand it. I am going to start writing letters. This should be a priority for all voters so we can hear them all in one place. Letters are definitely a start, next is our votes... I agree, this should be our priority... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sun 09/28/08 08:07 AM
|
|
I would have loved to seen Ron Paul and what he could bring to the table..Its sad like this is it now you have to pick!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would have loved to seen Ron Paul and what he could bring to the table..Its sad like this is it now you have to pick!!! OMG Ron Paul is the shizzle... If he were allowed to debate American's would be REALLY dissapointed with the other two... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He was making more money than all the other GOP candidates combined, was receiving more money from the military than any other candidate, both parties and he got an average of 5 mins. per debate to speak.
Ron would bend these two over his knee and spank them, but good. |
|
|
|
|
