Topic: The best candidates special interest money can buy or "Who O | |
---|---|
by Don Rasmussen on 10/05/08
Special thanks to the Center for Responsive Politics for existing, and to Matt Collins for doing the research on it. Top 10 Corporate PAC Contributors: Obama: Goldman Sachs $739,521 UBS AG $419,550 Lehman Brothers $391,774 Citigroup Inc $492,548 Morgan Stanley $341,380 Latham & Watkins $328,879 Google Inc $487,355 JPMorgan Chase & Co $475,112 Sidley Austin LLP $370,916 Skadden, Arps et al $360,409 McCain: Merrill Lynch $349,170 Citigroup Inc $287,801 Morgan Stanley $249,377 Wachovia Corp $147,456 Goldman Sachs $220,045 Lehman Brothers $115,707 Bear Stearns $108,000 JPMorgan Chase & Co $206,392 Bank of America $133,975 Credit Suisse Group $175,503 ------------------------------------------------- I repeat not one whits difference between the 2 of them, both are bought and paid for. |
|
|
|
Google is ok.
![]() |
|
|
|
it seems no matter who you'll choose to vote for, the lobbyist have already gotten to them
who's running independent, again? ![]() |
|
|
|
it seems no matter who you'll choose to vote for, the lobbyist have already gotten to them who's running independent, again? ![]() Nader is the Independent, Baldwin is the Constitution party, McKinney is the Green and Barr the CIA man is Libertarian. |
|
|
|
it seems no matter who you'll choose to vote for, the lobbyist have already gotten to them who's running independent, again? ![]() Nader is the Independent, Baldwin is the Constitution party, McKinney is the Green and Barr the CIA man is Libertarian. are ANY of these people untouchable by lobbyist? or is it a lost cause? |
|
|
|
I'm leaning toward Baldwin, but Naders big battle has always been corporate fascism.
|
|
|