Topic: Rednecks for Obama
Lynann's photo
Mon 10/20/08 12:10 PM
Interesting...this article appeared in a British paper.

Beer drinkers for Obama
Many southerners are leaving behind the region's racist history and embracing the idea of a black president
Comments (32)


Terry Mancour
guardian.co.uk,
Monday October 20 2008 13.00 BST


I was headed into my local grocer in Durham, North Carolina last weekend when I saw a startling sight. A pickup truck of early 1990s era was in the carpark, and scrawled across the side of it in big, carefully-lettered permanent marker were the words "Southern White Hard-Working Beer-Drinking Gun-Owning White Man In His 50s FOR OBAMA!", with the last two words drawn about eighteen inches high.

Now, it isn't uncommon for a man to deface his beloved pickup truck in the South, especially when he is passionate about a cause. This isn't to say that we don't revere the iconic pick-up truck much the way that some nomads revere horses or camels. It's as much an economic issue as anything – a man with a pick-up truck won't starve, ever. But as such, most truck-owning Southerners treat their vehicles like prized thoroughbreds – it takes a lot to bring a man to voluntarily deface it. When it does happen, it is a bold and powerful statement to the community.

Usually a Nascar racing team is involved, or a local government agency who he feels has targeted him unfairly. Ex-wives frequently crop up on the sides of trucks – as do their lawyers – and especially after September 11, global Islamic terrorists and our war-weary troops have been the favourite subjects. And religious verse and iconography are not infrequent, either. Pickup trucks in the South are a kind of rolling marginalia, an eight-cylinder object d'art, a practical exercise of free speech on big tires.

So when a Southern white man defaces his white truck in the name of an African American candidate for office – favourably – that is indeed worthy of note by us casual "pickup truck spotters".

Admittedly, we are in a solidly-Democratic city with a large African-American population, with one of the most liberal private universities in the nation and the South's second highest lesbian population. If you travel 50 miles in any direction from Durham, you emerge into the "real" rural South, famed in song, story and film for its quaint cultural attitudes, casual violence, extreme politeness and devout religious piety. And, of course, its racial insecurity.

Race intrudes in just about every aspect of life in the American south that it becomes part of the atmosphere, like the water in a fishtank. I didn't really understand that myself until I traveled beyond the South and realized the difference. Once upon a time it would have been nigh unthinkable for a white man, no matter how liberal, to voice support for an African-American political candidate - period. After 30 years of consistent jabbing at the old Southern social order, such things are more common today. The "Age of Obama" has helped shake up the last vestiges of the old regime, however, and as we approach Election Day it's easy to see how the casual racism that used to be so overt in Dixie can be so easily exhumed.

The danger to the Obama campaign in the South has always been racial in nature – and his campaign has done its best to distance itself from the traditional southern African American political machines (which are just as corrupt and effective as the white Republican political machines) while still energizing the base they represent. It's been a delicate dance, and one made harder by his middle name and African heritage. Militant "Black Muslims" have always been a boogey-man to ignorant white voters in the South, and damning Obama by implication is second nature to his opponents here. They nearly salivated over the inflammatory Jeremiah Wright video, figuring it was an open-and-shut condemnation that would keep the region safely red this year.

Not so fast.

The race card has been continuously played here for 200 years, now, and used to effect political change, usually by wealthy white people. It has led to the only successful coup d'etat in American history, the deaths of thousands by lynching, the disenfranchisement of a good 20% of the population, and a racially-based caste system that took decades to overthrow. Today it leaves behind a residue that is all-too-apparent in this presidential race.

Sometimes it's blatant. "You're just supporting Obama because of white guilt," one woman of my parents' generation accuses me. "They are trying to make you feel bad because of slavery!" she whines. She's voted Democratic in every election I've voted in, but she's suddenly become a conservative Republican, now that McCain is facing a black man. My protests about the race-neutral issue of a trillion dollars spent on our foreign wars meaning more to me than four centuries of racial injustice fall on deaf ears. To her, the only reason a sane white Southerner would ever support an African American for president is because of racial guilt.

Sometimes it's slightly more subtle. Another lady from my church, one I privately called "the Right Arm Of God" - not because of her observed piety, I should probably point out, but for her excessive zeal in protecting her daughter's virtue - is upset that I've been vocal in support of Obama in public where people can see. "I hope you'll use that intellect to get the right man elected," she cautions me. I don't need to be a genius to figure out what she means.

But sometimes you find relief from the ignorance in unexpected places. Like when my brother-in-law, a deputy sheriff, epitome of Southern conservative power, pulled into my driveway and nodded to my Obama sticker. "I'm gonna vote for that sumb*tch," he expressed, colourfully. "Looks like McCain's gonna be another term for George Bush, and I'd rather vote for a damn Muslim negro than that." And no, he didn't use the word "negro". It was the same day I saw that pick-up truck with the proud pro-Obama message.

Baby steps.

AdventureBegins's photo
Mon 10/20/08 01:00 PM
I would have found the article stimulating...

Till I read the bold faced (democratic spin) lie bout halfway through.

The political machine that is pushing Obama is well known.

Never before have we seen Chi Town politics on the national stage. We are seeing it now and it sickens me.

1. If you say anything bad about their canditate you get slapped with 1000's of letters, 100's of lawers and told that you MUST be brought down. Chicago Politics.
2. If you point out facts you are a lier, will be labled as such, and the voters will be immediatly informed that you are scared to stick to the 'real issues'.
3. If you embarrass the canditate in any way you will be followed, have your past dug up as though YOU are running for office, have all this information given to local and national media (who of course are helping anyway) and have your words twisted, you charator questiond, and you life turned upside down. (this is so anyone else with a GOOD QUESTION might be afraid to ask it).
4. Most important step... Stuff so many NEW names at the system that in attempting to deal with hundreds and hundreds of thousands of new names they will miss the 30 or 40 thousand that ARE actual FRAUD.
5. Never answer a question with a direct answer. Allways redirect the question to one of your party lines... One which the voters like and you know if you say it often enough they will not notice the REAL answer to the question...

The above is in answer to this in reference to Obama... "and his campaign has done its best to distance itself from the traditional southern African American political machines (which are just as corrupt and effective as the white Republican political machines)" Obama does not need traditional SOUTHERN African American Political Machines.
He as firmly embraced the CHICAGO POLITICAL Machine (which is far more effective).

Dragoness's photo
Mon 10/20/08 01:24 PM
Surprisingly there are alot of people one would not expect going for Obama, which is good.

I could even accept the Anti Obama people if they would steer clear of the hatemongering subjects. Here is the reason:

If the media had covered McCain's birth outside of the US as much as Obama's birth in the US, maybe it would not be hatemongering

If the media had covered the terrorist links McCain has with Liddy, white supermists and abortion clinic terrorists as much as Wright and Ayers, then maybe it would not be hatemongering.

If the media had covered McCain's association with Acorn as much as they covered Obama's, then maybe it would not be hatemongering.

Get the point?

Lynann's photo
Mon 10/20/08 01:48 PM
Yeah, I am fairly sure a dem spray painted this guys truck and told him what to say! (sarcasm)

Not everyone is Joe the Plant.

AdventureBegins's photo
Mon 10/20/08 02:02 PM
Lets be sure to use the redirect approach... Oh my don't mention the inaccuracys in this biasd and slanted news article...

Just be sure that you understand this truck driver is for obama...

and oh yeah... Remember while you are at it that the rebublicans think so far ahead that they planted a sleeper in a house years ago so that Obama could walk by his driveway and be accosted by this man...

EEEK yall cause me to wonder about the intelligent aspect of the human race... Is there any such thing on this planet?

Dragoness's photo
Mon 10/20/08 02:13 PM
noway huh

no photo
Mon 10/20/08 02:42 PM
I live in the south, watch Nascar and eat grits...I guess Im a redneck!!!