Okay, for those who know me, I have been doing a bit of an experiment to compare Fox news with the other networks.

On Biden's comments over the weekend about a president being tested when first in office.

Fox has been hashing this and hashing this when on the other stations they have already understood that Biden meant ALL presidents can be tested when they first get into office and they interviewed the pentagon which has been studying and preparing for any type of international incident since THE PENTAGON IS AWARE THAT A CHANGE IN OUR POWERS HERE SIGNIFIES A WEAKNESS TO BE UTILIZED BY OUR ENEMIES.

Fox has not even caught up with the other stations in providing their audience with this crucial information the other stations have covered.

To me, Fox is not doing their audience any favors in keeping them limited to the one side.

AP - Gov. Sarah Palin charged the state for her children to travel with her, including to events where they were not invited, and later amended expense reports to specify that they were on official business.

Truth...

Fox has not reported this with the democratic spin. I watched the speach not the soundbytes as reported by other news services. Biden did not say this as EVERY president. He mentions Obama and how HIS inexperiance will be tried.

Not only that but during the speach he states in no uncertine terms that Obamas original reaction to the 'crisis' will be INCORRECT and the supporters of Obama will need to understand this and assist Obama in correcting it.

NEVER TRUST ANY NEWS SERVICE... Fox has a slant. NBC has a slant. ABC has a slant. CNN has a slant. CBS has a slant. Every group and web site that purports to be reporting news HAS A SLANT.

YOU HAVE A SLANT.

Making mountains out of mole hills.
Sounds like words of a desparate campaign.

Well that is the least of her sins I can assure you that.

I do understand that but I am a little put back that they would not want their viewers to be getting up to date information to make intelligent decisions, especially now.

You have been mislead. At no time did Biden say "inexperienced". At no time did he imply that it was happening ONLY because Obama is coming into office.

I heard the whole thing and although I did wonder at his mental state during some of it. He did not say that Obama would be the reason for the incident.

Get it right!@!@!

What?...

Biden made the comment... You know... The DEMOCRATIC VP pick.

How then is it 'desparate' for the other side to point out his comments... How can the worship of the lie gotten so far out of hand that one is accused of creating a mountain when that mountain was created by the other side.

This is like claiming joe was a plant...

Re - dik - u - las in the extreme.

more spin...
Unfortunatly most people will believe only what they hear instead of checking it out for themselves.

Find the speach that Biden was giving... I have no doubt it can be found in its entirety on the internet. You will be shocked at what he actually said (even fox news is being nice about it the truth is far worse then they are making out)... If you know anything about international relations at all.

All new presidents get tested and bush got tested on 911 and rather than react in a sane manner and bringing the "CRIMINALS" to justice he started 2 wars and killed hundreds of thousands of innocents who had nothing to do with 911

I heard the whole thing. I am telling you he did not say inexperienced once in the speech and he did not imply that this would only happen just because Obama would be coming into office.

The hatemongering continues, it seems.

Normally I would not say this to any one on a site like this.

I also heard the speach... In it entirety.

It is a reckless thing he said.

And you are falsely represtenting...

Did you actually listen. I doubt it.

I did listen and I agree, some of what he said was uncalled for completely. But the part being taken out of context is as I stated and it is correct.

As an afterthought I have heard that when people speak so much they get kinda brain dead so maybe he lost it for a minute or two, who knows but I am sure he did not mean that Obama was the only president this phenomena would happen to, as history shows, and that Obama is more of a risk in this area than McCain.

I don't think it was reckless I think it was a statement of the obvious.

I don't care if it's McCain or Obama who's elected. They will face a test whether we know it or not from out enemies.