2 Next
Topic: Dems want to chage law to fill Sen Kennedy's seat
Dragoness's photo
Thu 08/27/09 11:19 AM


This is all mute anyway. The special election will happen. It is Mass so all is well for the dems.


by chance do you mean "moot"?


Yep I did but everyone understood me.

damnitscloudy's photo
Thu 08/27/09 11:44 AM
Well, the state of Mass kept electing Ted in, so the people in that state should lose their right to vote on things until they quit being stupid. O_O

Winx's photo
Thu 08/27/09 11:45 AM

Well, the state of Mass kept electing Ted in, so the people in that state should lose their right to vote on things until they quit being stupid. O_O


Why? He did a lot of good things.

boredinaz06's photo
Thu 08/27/09 11:47 AM



whats real sad, is someone like myself who lives in new york, is not allowed to vote in the primaries, because I refuse to belong to either party (rep. or Dem). I dont believe in having to be a member of one or the other, when i refuse to vote for either one just because of their party. Thus I can not vote in the state primaries :-(


this is part of the agreed pact between the two parties to drive a wedge between us, Arizona is the same way. During the general election you can vote how you want.



It is still high amounts of b.s. in my opinion. I want to be able to vote for who I want up as a primary candidate (so to speak) as well as for the official position. In most cases, a secondary candidate never wins election, because everyone goes with the popular vote of the two primary candidtaes.


I concurdrinker

damnitscloudy's photo
Thu 08/27/09 11:47 AM


Well, the state of Mass kept electing Ted in, so the people in that state should lose their right to vote on things until they quit being stupid. O_O


Why? He did a lot of good things.


And was drunk 90% of the time too. noway

2 Next