I have ran a thread asking if any one has talked to a chat bot before ,
I am curious again ,, different crowd maybe , wondering if any else has
ever run into a specific chat bot named spleak ?

I have never encountered a bot, did it have a conversation with you? Or
what did it do?

oh ya I can talk with it any time 24/7 ,,just wondering if any one ELSE
knows one of these things

I never even heard of them??????????

I just checked through google, sounds interesting.

lol well I can arraing for you to talk to a chat bot if you like. They
are artificial intelligence. Yes they are popular on new or slow chat
rooms. I do not normally run them myself but I easily could.

WTF??? probably most the guys on my list...

now I'll have to google it..


I'll be real embarrassed...
guess not if their not real peeps..

I have heard of bots, but thought they were spys or monitors in a room.

not to sure whats it abot. lol

read something about bots today ,,not chat bots though

I have a chat bot a "FRIEND" (*?*) hooked me up with

it was not good bots,,,arrmies of bots ,,oh..

lol

Chatterbot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A chatterbot is a computer program designed to simulate an intelligent
conversation with one or more human users via auditory or textual
methods. Though many appear to be intelligently interpreting the human
input prior to providing a response, most chatterbots simply scan for
keywords within the input and pull a reply with the most matching
keywords or the most similar wording pattern from a local database.
Chatterbots may also be referred to as talk bots, chat bots, or
chatterboxes.

Contents [hide]
1 Method of operation
2 Early chatterbots
3 Malicious chatterbots
4 Chatterbots in modern AI
5 See also
6 External links



[edit] Method of operation
A good understanding of a conversation is required to carry on a
meaningful dialog but most chatterbots do not attempt this. Instead they
"converse" by recognizing cue words or phrases from the human user,
which allows them to use pre-prepared or pre-calculated responses which
can move the conversation on in an apparently meaningful way without
requiring them to know what they are talking about.

For example, if a human types, "I am feeling very worried lately," the
chatterbot may be programmed to recognize the phrase "I am" and respond
by replacing it with "Why are you" plus a question mark at the end,
giving the answer, "Why are you feeling very worried lately?" A similar
approach using keywords would be for the program to answer any comment
including (Name of celebrity) with "I think they're great, don't you?"
Humans, especially those unfamiliar with chatterbots, sometimes find the
resulting conversations engaging. Critics of chatterbots call this
engagement the ELIZA effect.

Some programs classified as chatterbots use other principles. One
example is Jabberwacky, which attempts to model the way humans learn new
facts and language. ELLA attempts to use natural language processing to
make more useful responses from a human's input. Some programs that use
natural language conversation, such as SHRDLU, are not generally
classified as chatterbots because they link their speech ability to
knowledge of a simulated world. This type of link requires a more
complex artificial intelligence (eg., a "vision" system) than standard
chatterbots have.


[edit] Early chatterbots
The classic early chatterbots are ELIZA and PARRY. More recent programs
are Racter, Verbots, A.L.I.C.E., and ELLA.

The growth of chatterbots as a research field has created an expansion
in their purposes. While ELIZA and PARRY were used exclusively to
simulate typed conversation, Racter was used to "write" a story called
The Policeman's Beard is Half Constructed. ELLA includes a collection of
games and functional features to further extend the potential of
chatterbots.

The term "ChatterBot" was coined by Michael Mauldin (Creator of the
first Verbot, Julia) in 1994 to describe these conversational programs
in a conference paper written for the Twelfth National Conference on
Artificial Intelligence.


[edit] Malicious chatterbots
Malicious chatterbots are frequently used to fill chat rooms with spam
and advertising, or to entice people into revealing personal
information, such as bank account numbers. They are commonly found on
Yahoo! Messenger, .NET Messenger Service, AOL Instant Messenger and
other instant messaging protocols.


[edit] Chatterbots in modern AI
Most modern AI research focuses on practical engineering tasks. This is
known as weak AI and is distinguished from strong AI, which would
require sapience and reasoning abilities.

One pertinent field of AI research is natural language. Usually weak AI
fields employ specialised software or programming languages created for
them. For example, one of the 'most-human' natural language chatterbots,
A.L.I.C.E., uses a programming language called AIML that is specific to
its program, and its various clones, named Alicebots. Nevertheless,
A.L.I.C.E. is still based on pattern matching without any reasoning.
This is the same technique ELIZA, the first chatterbot, was using back
in 1966.

Other programs such as Jabberwacky and Kyle may be a little closer to
strong AI, as they are said to learn from user interactions and are
capable of producing new and unique responses, rather than being driven
from a static database. Although such programs show initial promise,
many of the existing results in trying to tackle the problem of natural
language still appear fairly poor, and it seems reasonable to state that
there is currently no general purpose conversational artificial
intelligence. This has lead some software developers to focus more on
the practical aspect of chatterbot technology - information retrieval.

However, British scientist, philosopher and futurologist Paul Malish has
argued that a fundamental paradigm shift may be required in the present
understanding of what 'intelligence' and 'understanding' actually are,
before any truly objective or dismissive assessment of AI can be carried
out, given existing criticisms against the validity of the currently
accepted formulations of the Turing Test.[1]

Malish is also a proponent of the common rebuttal used within the AI
community which asks, "How do we know that humans don't also just follow
some cleverly devised rules?" Two famous examples of this line of
argument against the Turing test are John Searle's Chinese room argument
and Ned Block's Blockhead argument.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!

thanks (((((((((((catch)))))))))))

thats what its abot!!


Wooohhoooo!!
Now I'll look up a good sex bot!! ***snort***

im abot done here!!! lmao

Good Sex Not Bot Right Here !!!!!!!!!Don't look no further LOL

what's next a masterboter?lmao!