| Topic: Should love be based on fascination? | |
|---|---|
      Should love be based on fascination?  
 | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     
      Fascination with what? 
    
Love itself? The person? I don't get it......  | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     
      love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no.
 
  Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods.  | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.     
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     Fascination with what?   
Love itself? The person? I don't get it......   me neither  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods.       
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.     
eh, illustration purposes...     
If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris.  | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.     
  Tiger isn't my type either  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     Fascination with what?   
Love itself? The person? I don't get it......   me neither  
Tricky monkey.   
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.     
eh, illustration purposes...     
If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris.   I agree.   Azz is what I would want rather than Paris  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     Fascination with what?   
Love itself? The person? I don't get it......   me neither  
Tricky monkey.   
  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     
      If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes 
    
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
     
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes   
  I agree  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
     
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes   
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard   
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes   
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard   
It usually is.   
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes   
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard   
  I have heard that too  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
| 
     If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes   
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard   
It usually is.   
  Indeed  
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
      Should love be based on fascination?  
LOVE...Such a complexed 4 letter word,an feeling?   
     | 
|
| 
     | 
|
 Should love be based on fascination?
 
 
 
    
 me neither
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
    
 I agree