100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Should love be based on fascination? | |
|---|---|
|
|
 Should love be based on fascination? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what?
 Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no.
Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it......  me neither
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type. eh, illustration purposes... If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type. Tiger isn't my type either
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither Tricky monkey. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type. eh, illustration purposes... If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris. I agree. Azz is what I would want rather than Paris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither Tricky monkey. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes  I agree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard It usually is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard I have heard that too
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard It usually is. Indeed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should love be based on fascination? LOVE...Such a complexed 4 letter word,an feeling?
|
|
|
|
|
