Abolish the Corporate Income Tax!

news.yahoo.com/abolish-corporate-income-tax-070000798.html

News that Pfizer, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, plans to buy Britain's AstraZeneca for $106 billion, renounce its U.S. citizenship, and declare itself a British company, has jolted Congress.

Pfizer is being denounced as disloyal to the land of its birth, and politicians are devising ways to stop Pfizer from departing.

Yet Pfizer is not alone. Hedge fund managers are urging giant corporations like Walgreens to go nation-shopping for new residences abroad to evade the 35 percent U.S. corporate income tax.

Britain's corporate income tax is 20 percent, and Pfizer stands to save over $1 billion a year by moving there.

In what are called "inversions," dozens of U.S. companies have bought up foreign rivals, and then moved abroad to countries with lower tax rates, cutting revenue to the U.S. Treasury.

But Pfizer is far and away the biggest.

The real question, however, is not why companies are fleeing the USA, but why our politicians continue to drive them out of the country.

Consider. Here in America we do not tax charities, churches or colleges. Yet these institutions produce a fraction of the jobs that businesses produce.

If, as a nation, we are committed to "creating jobs," does it make sense to impose the highest corporate tax rate in the Western world on our biggest and best job creators?

Is this not economic masochism?

Many governors understand that if you want something in your state, you do not drive it out with high taxes. You strengthen the magnet of low taxes.

Florida wants residents of other states to move there and retire there, so it has no income, estate or inheritance tax.

For years, Rep. Jack Kemp urged the creation of enterprise zones in poor communities like Benton Harbor, Michigan, and Harlan County, Kentucky. Businesses that relocated there would be exempt from corporate income taxes.

Why not make the United States the largest enterprise zone on earth — by abolishing the corporate income tax?

If the corporate income tax were repealed, no U.S. company would think of moving abroad, and every transnational company would think about moving to the USA.

What a message this repeal of the U.S. corporate income tax would send to corporate headquarters worldwide: Relocate your company or next factory to the USA, keep every dollar of profit you earn, and either reinvest it here or take it home. Your call.

How would America benefit?

Every U.S. company, liberated from its corporate tax burden, would see its profits soar and have more cash on hand for cutting prices, raising wages and salaries, and new investment and hires. And every company that relocated here would create new U.S. jobs.

This would be a stimulus package to end all stimulus packages.

Isn't this what we all want? Or are we not willing to create jobs here if the means of doing so conflict with redistributionist ideology?

Consider the other benefits of abolishing the corporate tax.

Corporate lobbyists, who spend their days walking Capitol Hill corridors seeking tax breaks, and their evenings at fundraisers handing $1,000 checks to congressmen who can create tax loopholes — in a form of legalized corruption and glorified bribery, could be put out to pasture.

Armies of tax lawyers, accountants and IRS agents could be shifted to more productive work. Companies could focus full time on creating new wealth, not finding ways to keep what they have earned.

Many politicians seem to think the corporate tax punishes the rich and powerful and is an indispensable weapon in reducing inequality and redistributing wealth. This is neosocialist myth.

As Ronald Reagan used to say, corporations don't pay taxes, people do.

The billions in corporate income taxes paid by Wal-Mart and McDonald's come out of the dollars spent by consumers who shop at Wal-Mart's and eat at McDonald's.

Where else does Ford Motor get the money to pay its corporate income tax, if not from dollars spent by Middle Americans on Ford cars and trucks?

Middle America pays the corporate income tax.

How could we make up for the lost revenue to government?

Simple. The corporate income tax last year produced $273 billion, less than a tenth of federal revenue. Imports, which kill U.S. jobs and subtract from GDP, totaled $2.7 trillion last year.

Put a 10 percent tariff on imports, and the abolition of the U.S. corporate income tax becomes a revenue-neutral proposal.

Looking back, consider what our political class has done to our once self-sufficient American Republic.

We impose on businesses, our principal job creators, the most punitive corporate tax rate in the West.

Through "free trade," we tell U.S. companies that if they wish to avoid our taxes and get around our minimum wage, health, safety, and environmental laws, they can move to China, produce there, and bring their products back free of charge — and kill their competitors too patriotic to leave America.

"The Decline and Fall of the United States of America" is going to be a piece of cake for future historians to write.

So why would anyone doubt that Mr. Buchanan would want to support anything other than the corporate party line. He is a member of the red team. But what is interesting are the comments on the article:



We start with what can be safely assumed as a supporter of the red team as he blames the liberals for the problems. But then goes on to make an absolute ridiculous statement. First, there is a difference between excise and income taxes. Excise taxes raise the price of goods across the board, every maker of a like product pays the same and passes that along as a cost of the goods sold. But income tax, rightfully charged to a corporation, a fiction of the government, within the limits of the 16th Amendment and the constitution. And this is a tax on the profit, which is income.

Income is the success at offering a product in the marketplace but is not part of the pricing dynamic used to determine the actual price of a product. Most companies pray that at the end of the year they are qualified to pay an income tax, they made a profit.

But here is an intelligent quote from that same article:



Now we have a supporter of the blue team as it's somehow the fault of the red team. But except for the removal of a right, his argument is something that makes sense, well except for making execs move, they can stay here and as officers of a foreign corporation pay US income taxes, another perfectly constitutional requirement.

But the rest makes absolute sense. You want to move your company elsewhere, we will tariff your products and use the revenue to support American businesses and jobs. We will also negate any US patents in which a US tax concession was given in prior years, they accepted the benefit, now they must face the consequences.

And these are all within the powers delegated to the congress within the Commerce clause to regulate foreign trade. Imagine something as simple as following the constitution to answer some of the ills of this country today. But this isn't going to happen until the masses wake up and realize that corporatism is but fascism practiced by psychopathic statist that think they have some authority instead of only the powers of administration of our supreme law, the constitution.