Topic: Will audio be authenticated? | |
---|---|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 08/26/14 09:35 AM
|
|
I don't know what will become of it. I imagine its difficult to authenticate audio and easy to create an audio and claim it to be one thing or another. But if it is authenticated, it could be of some significance to the case
http://news.yahoo.com/audio-recording-michael-brown-shooting-reportedly-surfaced-110200309.html |
|
|
|
I have heard of meth and crack causing people to have super strength
but if I have been shot at least twice already after I turn, where would the strength or impulse kick in to CHARGE towards the gunfire? I do hope they can enhance the audio to a point where voices can be heard,, either yelling stop, or stop shooting, or 'taunting' the officer to shoot,,, I do see how both sides can use it for their claim it would quash with the witness who stated he shot after Brown turned to surrender and then continued to shoot,, that would account for the pause it would also quash with the 'witnesses' who claim Brown turned and taunted him, if the taunting happened after the first few bullets struck his front,,,,but not his 'largest center of mass' that I am so often told has to be the target for safety reasons,,, if they struck his arm while he turned, he could have had a temporary death wish and decided to just charge at the shooter that's why recording of what was actually being SAID is important to give more credit or discredit some of the 'witness' accounts |
|
|
|
Cnn paraded it as gospel fact and now they say 'unverified'..
Yeah... |
|
|
|
Spin, spin, spin. Create the MYTH and they will believe.
![]() |
|
|