Topic: Why is it that for the `official` | |
---|---|
Why is it that for the `official` version of 9-11 to be true, one must
suspend the laws of physics and logic? Bombs in the buildings, 7 of the 9-11 hijackers are still alive, controlled demolitions, building falling at freefall speed from fire, a passport surviving the attacks while none of the black boxes do, countless firefighters and witnesses saying there were bombs in the towers and building 7, building 7, put options on AA stock in the days leading up to 9-11, Larry silverstien`s comments on the PBS documentary `rebuilding America`, Norman Minetta`s testimony, The fact the Osama is a CIA asset. maybe you should tell us - you seem to be the expert in suspending the laws of logic All strange and unbelievable. Show the documentation on the physics. Show me where the 7 hijackers are being held. No proof of bombs. All just so much paranoid bunkum Because some Americans still believe the magic bullet theory No one could be stupid enough to actually believe this crap can they? can you get any more stupid? I mean really - you practice it? Few have as little in the way of mental capactiy as someone who would belive your crap. Your fellow conspiracy nutcakes are going to be SO pissed at you... You forgot that old crackpot tale about the Israeli embassy calling all the Jews and telling them not to go to work that day. (Boy, you can sure tell the flooby doodles in here, can't ya?) Wow! A whole list of conspiracy theories. They're getting funnier and funnier. I wonder how many of these conspiracy theories are started by the terrorists. There is a difference between being a skeptic, being gullible and fantasy fiction. You think you're a skeptic, you'd say we were gullible and most of us would say you're into fantasy fiction. Take your meds and stop spreading your dis-information. You're aiding Osama, you traitor! You're the gullible one. reading too much sci fi again the hijackers are dead, no controlled demo ( ok I will give you building 7 but that was a gov building and I am sure it had to be destroyed due to the damage to destroy the evidence in it. witnesses saying it sounded or looked like bombs, and yep, a buidling falling in on each floor would do that exact same effect. stock goes up and goes down The planes hit, many of us lost friends and families on those planes, jerks that say things like this have no information at all and do a disrespect to the heros on those planes that died for thier nation. The planes were destroyed, the people on the planes died, that is a fact plain and simple. The rest is not true, all the myths have been debunked on one site or another, only those that wish to support terroirist would even beleive this any longer. Any support for your assertions? No! Bombs in the buildings? Says who? Proof? If 7 of the hijackers are still alive where are they and how do you know they're alive? Cite your sources rather than making a bunch of groundless assertions. Controlled demolitions? Says who? Proof? Building fell because the intense heat of the jet fuel-fed fire melted the metal girders after the impact of the initial collision scraped the insulation off of them. Who's passport? Building 7 survived relatively unscathed. Why, if there was a bomb? Put options on AA stock were recommended in a widely circulated and much trusted investment newsletter which was quoted in Barrons 9 days before 9/11. Option traders are vigilant for those who trade options with inside information. Because of the leverage available options tend to be the vehicle for those looking to make a fast buck. Option market makers end up holding the bag and will immediately notify the SEC to suspicious trading activity, mostly because when it's proven the option market makers will be reimbursed from the ill-gotten gains. Thus, the SEC has looked into this extensively. It's simply not true. The Larry Silver...oh to hell with it, you're a crackpot without any facts to support your allegations. If you want to be taken seriously learn how to spell and write. Bombs? Proof? Controlled demo? No proof (squibs? How about breaking windows?) Freefall? Did not fall that fast. Passport survival- so did a lot of other debris- common in such incidents Bomb witnesses- HEARD bomb-like sounds at odd intervals. Not proof A lot of the conspiracy stuff unravels when you investigate the claims. Timetables are off, weight is given to rushed impressions, etc. The whole 'molten steel' bit for example is based on one guys observation when you follow the reports back to the origins. Many of the claims of the conspiracy folk are easily as illogical and impossible so why are they 'more right'? You are entitled to be a sceptic in this world we live in. Lord only knows we have reaon to be. But why are you focusing on the twin towers? Don't waste your time on something so obvious!Even Mr Bush isn't that clueless. Search for the smaller "hinks" in situations over the past five years. That should keep you occupied for a while and maybe make you wealthy with a book deal and a made for TV film! The 'official version' fits the laws of physics just fine. your problem is you believing the bull crap you just listed. Only the Conspiracy theories defy not only the laws of physics, but plain old COMMON SENSE as well. No proof of bombs are to be found anywhere. and bombs would NOT have cause the buildings to collapse the way they did. all 19 of the hijackers are dead in the planes. none are still alive. The ones people claim to be alive are not the hijackers but other people with same and similar names and widely different ages. there is no way in hell those were controlled demolitions. to think those were is to suspend the laws of physics. yes a passport survived. SO? many things survive that cant be explained. in any disaster from Tornadoes to plane crashes. No one Said there WERE. Many said "it seemed like there were" big diff. all the rest of your crap is just anecdotal Osama is NOT a CIA asset. that's just you talking out your A ss Source(s): USN Vet Because an official version is needed to convince the people that the country needs to be protected by a bunch of warmongers... First, a few days prior to the attacks. Building 7 suddenly had a multi-BILLIONdollar insurance policy placed on it, EMPHAZING terrorist attacks. Second. Bin Laden is dead and has been. |
|
|
|
wow, well said
|
|
|