I agree his downfall is his ego,,,

he struck at everyone out the gate, ESPECIALLY media, and he doesn't seem capable of taking what he dishes out

Although I'm not a Democrat or a Republican, Bernie Sanders has been reducing Hillery Clintons lead, in fact, as of today, he actually has a slight lead.

Besides her obvious shortcomings, to what do you attribute Bernies apparent appeal?

Would you vote for him if you are a republican?
Would you democrats vote for any of the republican candidates?

I think in any job,, understanding the job is one of the qualifications,,lol

coming to the interview and just spouting off all the stuff you believe you an do or want the company to do , ,doesnt get the job

know the role of the job, the authority that is and isnt there, the resources that are and arent available,,,,,

thats a good start,,,

somehow I think the rate that new guns are manufactured far exceeds the rate laws aer being passed,,,,

so Im doubting they will ever be all but banned,, especially not in only one hundred years,,,

Nope, I'm not assuming anything. I'm reporting facts which contradict one of the favored fantasies of the more rabid Second Amendment-as-word-of-god crowd.

I am a gun owner too. I'm also a devotee of factually based logic, and not wild emotional nonsense masquerading as patriotism.

The Iron Fist Rule which you describe, included what would now be called gun control.

My point, is only that allowing anyone and everyone to carry guns, doesn't cause crime to fall. There is no historic support for that claim, and that is what has been claimed in this thread. That some large organization of "liberals" all declared that Texas would erupt in gun battles, is also false. SOME people may have said that, but SOME people say crap no matter what happens.

If we are going to discuss a subject, any subject, I want the discussion to be factual and logical. Not just exchanges of emotionalized political bombast and self-worship.

I have listened to him,, and still havent heard anything REMOTELY close to taking everyones guns'

There is historic precedent for reducing gun carry in order to reduce gun crime, throughout the Old West. Every town which was infamous for gun crimes, was "tamed" by gun control laws. Not by having everyone packing.

I understand the disparity in which we want to keep OUR guns. I get what you are thinking about rate of fire and capacity. The error is the difference between rate of fire and cyclic rate. Sure if a gun can spit out 50 rounds in 12.5 seconds (rough estimate) that's about 4 per second. 10 of them might hit A target(s) and 40 would miss. That's 20% efficient. The same weapon with 4 30 round mags is CAPABLE of firing at the same cyclic rate but it takes time to drop a mag, access another, orient load and seat the mag and charge if necessary and possibly resight. Pros obviously are much better at this but even if they take 1.5 seconds between the last shot from the first mag and the first shot from the second, that's 1.5 seconds and 20 less shots before an opportunity to physically take down, distract, find cover, lay flat, is any of this sounding familiar? Split seconds can mean life or death which was tragically proven in the Fort Hood shooting in 09. If you heard the numbers of shots fired and number of wounded and dead you would assume it was a high cap assault rifle mag drum or box or there had to be more than one shooter. I did, sick, shocked hurt and was even more sick when one of my doctors and the only civilian victim died. So this **** is personal to me. Hassan was extremely skilled with one pistol. Imagine if that level of skill accuracy was 100 rounds instead of 20 per mag. When you're in a place so overwhelmingly crowded and you don't care which blob you blow a hole in you don't have to be accurate, all you have to do is keep pulling the trigger and control the weapon.

Even if you stay engaged on the rear sight never blink and don't fumble the mag the empty has to clear the well and the full mag has to replace it. That takes time, a second, 3 seconds maybe 5 if the shooter is nervous or drops it, it could be the difference of life or deaths.

That church... Should stay where they are and RESPECT THE DEAD.

No, our police and military have theirs and the Chattanooga PD proved their efficiency. This was a moving hostile target firing on them and they limited the number of casualties ending THIS threat. Great job Chattanooga PD. Look at what a static Major Nadal did with a handgun13 dead and 32 wounded. This proves that you don't need a 100 round drum if you are proficient with your weapon. This guy wasn't accustomed to placing his shots or target selection or there would have been more casualties. 4 dead one wounded is no where near the hit miss ratio Nadal did. This is bad but it could have been much worse.
My plan makes too much sense, it'll never work.

so theoretically if i work a job making say 15$ an hour, and i bust my balls at work. i was under the impression i got paid more than fast food workers because i have a harder job. so now if they are going to get paid 15$ an hour, is my pay going to be adjusted accordingly? after all my job is harder and requires more brain power and responsibility. so im going to have a job that is 10 times harder than flipping burgers, but yet my pay still stay the same, but these people will be getting 15$ an hour to flip burgers?

the bible, the constitution, the declaration of independence


Answer: What are , documents written in another time and culture that people will always debate the meaning of,,,,,,?