well, that's me out of the hunt.

Another thread to bash Israel. How odd.

Wrong again, I'm sick to death of your stupid ****.

Obviously it works for you.

Oh, do shut up.

Only eight and they're fairly small, my largest is app. 2 inches long. I also collect fossils, but I don't have a lot of those either, it's hard to find affordable specimens that haven't been damaged by hammers.

Rocks and minerals are cool as well.

That must have been one sick fart to make those guys cut their way out of the tents and run off into the tundra naked.

Well, if your friend used a proper wood working adhesive, there should be no problem. I can't tell from the pic, but breaks that are well repaired are often stronger than the surrounding wood, so, I suggest you string it up and tune to concert pitch and see how it goes.

You're all wrong!

The Papacy is a unbroken line of Reptilians dating back to the Borgias.

Pope Alexander receives the Reptilian's 'Little Black Book' from the Grand Dragon, Isa Gator.

Damn straight! Being a collector, I hope fragments turn up on the meteorite market soon.

Yes, dear.

Because you never get the jokes doesn't necessarily mean they're not funny.

That mob sounds all too familiar.

Credibility? It never had any.

Yeah, I'll give you that. How about 'Inspiration for comic material?'

The footage was spectacular, and although I feel for the victims, this was an amazing event.

Clonetrooper Flegg 463:

"Why were there no CCTV cameras in the Death Star Toilets if the story is supposed to be crap?"

Now, back to Mineta:

"I started to establish a direct line to the FAA to find out what was going on, and the Vice President and I were across from each other on the conference room table in the PEOC, and about this time someone came in and said this was -- when I finally got in there, it was probably about 9:27, is what I recall.
And a little later on, someone said, "Mr. Vice President, there's a plane 50-miles out." So I was talking to Monte Belger, the Deputy Director of the FAA, and I said, "Monte, what do you have 50-miles out?"
He said, "Well, we have a target, bogey, on the radar, but the transponder's been turned off, so we have no identification of this aircraft. We don't know who it is. We don't know what altitude it's at, speed or anything else. All we're doing is watching with the sweep of the radar, the dot moving from position to position."
So then someone came in, the same person came in and said, "Mr. Vice President, it -- the plane's 30-miles out." So I said, "Monte, can you see it, and where is it in relationship to the ground?"
He said, "Well, that's difficult to really determine. I would guess it's somewhere between Great Falls and National Airport, coming what they call the DRA, the down river approach."
And so then the person came in and said, "Mr. Vice President, the plane's ten-miles out," and so I said, "Monte, where is it?" and he said, "Well, I'm not really sure but I'd be guessing somewhere maybe between the USA Today building and, and National Airport."
And then pretty soon he said, "Oh-oh, we just lost the target." And so a few moments later, someone came in and said, "Mr. Vice President, there's been an explosion at the Pentagon."
So I said, "Monte, is there something -- can you identify it as being at the Pentagon?" He said, "No, we can't really pinpoint it like that."
Then about that time someone broke into our phone conversation and said, "Mr. Secretary, we've had a call from an Arlington County police officer saying that he saw an American Airlines airplane go into the Pentagon."
At that point I said, "Monte, bring all the airplanes down,"

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Norman_Mineta


That conflicts with this:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGI5BmNd7AE

Hmm.....

That conclusion was probably reached by your prejudice more so than by reason. A prejudice that has been evinced throughout your posting record. Remember, arguing from incredulity is a logical fallacy. Furthermore, everybody thinks his, or her ******** detector is better than everyone else's, so that statement doesn't really mean anything either.



But knowing the facts help identify whether an anomaly is actually an anomaly. This is where many fail.



Well, that's a rather superficial evaluation.
Obviously, nobody benefited from the outcome, however, False flag proponents conveniently ignore the campaign against the US waged by Al-Qaeda for almost a decade prior to 9/11. In my field, that is quite a major oversight, and to use the vernacular, that's a ****ing big smoking gun.



Well, again that belief would be determined by personal bias, and as the US gears up to leave Afghanistan and Iraq to determine themselves, the old 'US Empire' rhetoric is losing its validity. Moreover, the US didn't get an amount of oil out of Iraq to justify the expenditure, so that old chestnut doesn't really fly either.

Anyway, there's an insane 'no-planer' on DH in dire need of a tutorial. Must fly!

Yes well, I've researched the 9/11 attacks ever since they occurred. These guys are lightweights compared to some, they just regurgitate the same old stuff over and over again and the content is quite old and long debunked. I'm debating (using the term loosely) with a very crazy 'no-planer' on another site, but he's just like the rest and rants without actually discussing the evidence. I need a challenge.

double post