100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Sheriffs Deputy gunned down in Texas | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
death is sweeter than continued life under tyranny ISNT THAT THE SELLING POINT OF THE CHERISHED 2nd AMENDMENT? has the constitution caused assassins throughout history to kill politicians? "tyranny" doesn't mean you can do whatever you like and not get hassled by the cops... when people are breaking the law, they should expect to get hassled by the police... so your definition of tyranny doesn't apply here... Tamir Rice was a kid playing with a toy, police shoot and kill him and not even reprimanded. Thats what people are protesting. Not the shooting of criminals. Really quite simple. how quickly you change your tune.... read back on some of your posts about how most everyone you've cried about was a 2 time felon... and not once did you have anything to say about the innocents like the 9 year shot by another black, while doing her homework... it really is that simple, you wanna throw your racist views around, while completely ignoring the real problem, which is the crimes committed by these thugs against the real innocents, and then call cops racist... people with that attitude is the problem, not the police... Police as a whole are not racist, racists in some cases are police. Black people are not racist as a whole. White people are not racist as a whole. Just so that's clear. The PERSON pictured above is not in a gilley suit. He's not wearing camouflage. The high contrast outfit much like the high contrast billboard is very visible. He's also walking upright nothing sneaky about his captured posture which indicates that he is not afraid to be seen. So the PERSON pictured above APPEARS to be determined to be seen committing murder. Premeditated cold blooded REvenge which is A RADICAL motive for HIM. While he may have approached from behind the deputy, the deputy WAS armed. The deputy in this case was doing nothing wrong and had no reason to be targeted kunless the investigation and or trial divulges an ulterior motive. This was A SINGLE criminal act by A SINGLE RADICAL CRIMINAL. This IS NOT the view or belief of black PEOPLE as A WHOLE. i won't argue with that, the whole point i'm trying to make is blacks kill more blacks than any other group in the US right now... calling cops racist, or saying they are singling out blacks, is only hampering the police in doing there job in making sure 9 year old little girls can do their homework and at the very least, grow up into adulthood... if it's a black on black crime, why would police be hassling white people? are white people going to know if tyronne shot someone? no, they are going to interview/question the people that were around the crime... and if a thug decides he's being harrased by the police and pulls a gun out, guess whats going to happen? there's racists in every color, but that doesn't mean everyone is a racist... You won't argue a self defeating argument? False. Anyone calling any particular cop or cops as a whole racist had NOTHING to do with that 9 year old girls death which for the 10th time wasn't intended or even known by the shooter. That's a red herring, a logical fallacy. Nobody is complaining about being questioned as a witness to a crime. Pointless. The scenario you created didn't occur. What did happen was several unarmed blacks were shot dead by SOME police officers, some for no reason at all without using their Taxpayer funded training Taxpayer funded pepper spray Taxpayer funded tazer Taxpayer funded club or Taxpayer funded non lethal shots which they are trained to do. They are also trained to step out of the way if someone is coming towards them unarmed. Black police are not shooting white 'suspects' on sight. Questioning when police commit crimes and enforce laws with racial bias does more to help good cops who are doing their jobs well. When police kill people on camera like Eric Garner who was begging for his life, having those officers stay employed even in another precinct hurts good cops who know how to write a ticket. If Garner had been ticketed or even arrested for the minor nonviolent crime he committed, no one would be angry about it. Millions of AMERICANS would never had known his name. Samuel Dubose if given a ticketed for his minor moving violation, would have had to pay fees and fines that would help Cincinnati City and university police do their jobs. Its not just Baltimore, Ferguson, L.A., NYC, these things are happening everywhere. The difference now from 20 years ago is there are more cameras recording what's going on and more people have access to more media almost constantly. It stands to reason that more people are going to know about the gross injustices, more people are going to be talking about them, more people are going to be angered by what they see. Criminals are expected to commit crimes, including murder. Police know this before they work their first shift. They know their job is dangerous and often deadly. Civilians, unarmed American citizens, either not committing crimes or crimes minor enough to not be a jailable offense should not be killed by police. http://www.youngcons.com/unarmed-white-man-was-killed-by-a-black-cop-look-how-the-media-responds/ http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/black-cop-kills-white-man-media-hide-race/ http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/aug/21/michael-medved/talk-show-host-police-kill-more-whites-blacks/ http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-families/justice-james-black-cop-shoots-unarmed-white-veteran-orange-tx-over-racial-slur-0057061 a simple search will get you thousands of hits of black cops killing white men... we just don't see it as a child would, meaning the cops have their job to do, while a majority of thugs see it as they wanna do what they want, when they want, however they want without following any laws... there's a reason why the media doesn't show these killings, and i already told you why.... 4, well actually 3. youngcons... Sounds offputting, but looks to be the closest you have to proving a point. You depend on young cons to prove a point. The second link is actually a sentence. A sentence anyone who understands the concept of media knows would hold no merit. The media doesn't hide things involving crime unless there is a gag order. Gag orders are not A construct of the media, they are a control measure over the media to keep them from compromising an investigation. More often than not the media aids investigations. Otherwise every citizen would have to go to their local precinct or agency 3 times a day or more to know who the police are looking for. The talkshow topic is irrelevant because it is not simple math. It's proportion. 3/10*a= 3/10*b= If (a) represents the white population which we know for a fact is much larger than the black population (b) + the rest of the minority groups then we know that statement has to be false. This is also invalid because all whites killed by police were not A. racially profiled B. unarmed C. killed for a minor and in many cases non jailable offense if any and D. at least one or all of A B and C + killed by black police. The third is supposedly a man killed by a black officer over use of a racial slur. ... this doesn't help your argument much at all. Besides the fact that black PEOPLE don't all break laws or break all laws, that still doesn't give police regardless of their color the right to kill them. That's not childish, that the law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's an easier takeaway
A's have no reason to kill B's B's have no reason to kill A's 1B kills 1A on video,is arrested for the murder of 1A, 1B will be tried convicted sentenced and punished accordingly. Several A's kill several B's on video. Many are not tried fewer convicted fewer still sentenced and punished. Given ONLY this information, are A's and B's being treated equally? Yes or no? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
death is sweeter than continued life under tyranny ISNT THAT THE SELLING POINT OF THE CHERISHED 2nd AMENDMENT? has the constitution caused assassins throughout history to kill politicians? "tyranny" doesn't mean you can do whatever you like and not get hassled by the cops... when people are breaking the law, they should expect to get hassled by the police... so your definition of tyranny doesn't apply here... Tamir Rice was a kid playing with a toy, police shoot and kill him and not even reprimanded. Thats what people are protesting. Not the shooting of criminals. Really quite simple. how quickly you change your tune.... read back on some of your posts about how most everyone you've cried about was a 2 time felon... and not once did you have anything to say about the innocents like the 9 year shot by another black, while doing her homework... it really is that simple, you wanna throw your racist views around, while completely ignoring the real problem, which is the crimes committed by these thugs against the real innocents, and then call cops racist... people with that attitude is the problem, not the police... Police as a whole are not racist, racists in some cases are police. Black people are not racist as a whole. White people are not racist as a whole. Just so that's clear. The PERSON pictured above is not in a gilley suit. He's not wearing camouflage. The high contrast outfit much like the high contrast billboard is very visible. He's also walking upright nothing sneaky about his captured posture which indicates that he is not afraid to be seen. So the PERSON pictured above APPEARS to be determined to be seen committing murder. Premeditated cold blooded REvenge which is A RADICAL motive for HIM. While he may have approached from behind the deputy, the deputy WAS armed. The deputy in this case was doing nothing wrong and had no reason to be targeted kunless the investigation and or trial divulges an ulterior motive. This was A SINGLE criminal act by A SINGLE RADICAL CRIMINAL. This IS NOT the view or belief of black PEOPLE as A WHOLE. i won't argue with that, the whole point i'm trying to make is blacks kill more blacks than any other group in the US right now... calling cops racist, or saying they are singling out blacks, is only hampering the police in doing there job in making sure 9 year old little girls can do their homework and at the very least, grow up into adulthood... if it's a black on black crime, why would police be hassling white people? are white people going to know if tyronne shot someone? no, they are going to interview/question the people that were around the crime... and if a thug decides he's being harrased by the police and pulls a gun out, guess whats going to happen? there's racists in every color, but that doesn't mean everyone is a racist... You won't argue a self defeating argument? False. Anyone calling any particular cop or cops as a whole racist had NOTHING to do with that 9 year old girls death which for the 10th time wasn't intended or even known by the shooter. That's a red herring, a logical fallacy. Nobody is complaining about being questioned as a witness to a crime. Pointless. The scenario you created didn't occur. What did happen was several unarmed blacks were shot dead by SOME police officers, some for no reason at all without using their Taxpayer funded training Taxpayer funded pepper spray Taxpayer funded tazer Taxpayer funded club or Taxpayer funded non lethal shots which they are trained to do. They are also trained to step out of the way if someone is coming towards them unarmed. Black police are not shooting white 'suspects' on sight. Questioning when police commit crimes and enforce laws with racial bias does more to help good cops who are doing their jobs well. When police kill people on camera like Eric Garner who was begging for his life, having those officers stay employed even in another precinct hurts good cops who know how to write a ticket. If Garner had been ticketed or even arrested for the minor nonviolent crime he committed, no one would be angry about it. Millions of AMERICANS would never had known his name. Samuel Dubose if given a ticketed for his minor moving violation, would have had to pay fees and fines that would help Cincinnati City and university police do their jobs. Its not just Baltimore, Ferguson, L.A., NYC, these things are happening everywhere. The difference now from 20 years ago is there are more cameras recording what's going on and more people have access to more media almost constantly. It stands to reason that more people are going to know about the gross injustices, more people are going to be talking about them, more people are going to be angered by what they see. Criminals are expected to commit crimes, including murder. Police know this before they work their first shift. They know their job is dangerous and often deadly. Civilians, unarmed American citizens, either not committing crimes or crimes minor enough to not be a jailable offense should not be killed by police. http://www.youngcons.com/unarmed-white-man-was-killed-by-a-black-cop-look-how-the-media-responds/ http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/black-cop-kills-white-man-media-hide-race/ http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/aug/21/michael-medved/talk-show-host-police-kill-more-whites-blacks/ http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-families/justice-james-black-cop-shoots-unarmed-white-veteran-orange-tx-over-racial-slur-0057061 a simple search will get you thousands of hits of black cops killing white men... we just don't see it as a child would, meaning the cops have their job to do, while a majority of thugs see it as they wanna do what they want, when they want, however they want without following any laws... there's a reason why the media doesn't show these killings, and i already told you why.... 4, well actually 3. youngcons... Sounds offputting, but looks to be the closest you have to proving a point. You depend on young cons to prove a point. The second link is actually a sentence. A sentence anyone who understands the concept of media knows would hold no merit. The media doesn't hide things involving crime unless there is a gag order. Gag orders are not A construct of the media, they are a control measure over the media to keep them from compromising an investigation. More often than not the media aids investigations. Otherwise every citizen would have to go to their local precinct or agency 3 times a day or more to know who the police are looking for. The talkshow topic is irrelevant because it is not simple math. It's proportion. 3/10*a= 3/10*b= If (a) represents the white population which we know for a fact is much larger than the black population (b) + the rest of the minority groups then we know that statement has to be false. This is also invalid because all whites killed by police were not A. racially profiled B. unarmed C. killed for a minor and in many cases non jailable offense if any and D. at least one or all of A B and C + killed by black police. The third is supposedly a man killed by a black officer over use of a racial slur. ... this doesn't help your argument much at all. Besides the fact that black PEOPLE don't all break laws or break all laws, that still doesn't give police regardless of their color the right to kill them. That's not childish, that the law. did you google it for yourself or just wanna nitpick what i answered for ya? black cops kill whites all the time, white's just aren't babies about it like blacks... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's an easier takeaway A's have no reason to kill B's B's have no reason to kill A's 1B kills 1A on video,is arrested for the murder of 1A, 1B will be tried convicted sentenced and punished accordingly. Several A's kill several B's on video. Many are not tried fewer convicted fewer still sentenced and punished. Given ONLY this information, are A's and B's being treated equally? Yes or no? prove what you're saying here, you're just repeating some other racist black... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This thread is being locked we feel it has run it's course..
Site Mod Kristi |
|
|
|
|
