germanchoclate1981's photo
Tue 08/15/17 08:10 PM
Edited by germanchoclate1981 on Tue 08/15/17 08:11 PM

This is without a doubt the darkest day in a presidency* overflowing with dark days & evil deeds. Time to flush this toilet & #ImpeachTrump


Google ''Dreamhost court filings"
Impeachment will likely occur but is unlikely to help. The problems are deeply rooted.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Mon 08/14/17 08:30 PM
You cannot buy love, trust, honesty, or loyalty. Only lust and or delayed betrayal.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Fri 07/28/17 10:32 PM
This user isn't responding because it is a bot. Proof? The user julietpaul777 has the same picture.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Fri 07/28/17 08:32 PM
Hi. I read your profile, and I understand you wanting to be happy but do you think your expectations are realistic?

germanchoclate1981's photo
Tue 05/02/17 03:34 AM
You're not alone, trust me. Do your best to be strong but understand that you are human and it is ok to show emotion. Bottling your feelings constantly can only lead to the bottle bursting or overflowing, so don't let that happen. I know it may sound dumb but take things one day at a time and be thankful (if) you still have your health. There will be bad days, just stay out of trouble and try not to isolate yourself too much.

Keep your head up.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Tue 03/28/17 08:08 PM
I respond to messages send nudges or messages? It doesn't work mingle. Why doesn't this happen to obviously fake profiles that are new or in non existing places or have pictures of models camgirls and pornstars?

GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH THE PHOTOS PLEASE. Please.
Thank you.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Mon 02/13/17 09:29 PM
COMMERCIAL!

germanchoclate1981's photo
Sun 12/04/16 01:58 AM
Request ≠ Granted
Denied to comment ≠ Confirmed

Does anyone have a thesaurus at Fox?

germanchoclate1981's photo
Thu 11/03/16 11:55 PM

I have developed a total aversion to this kind of approach:


There is an author who suggests that we have 5 ways of expressing our love to others including :-

1. Affirming words (saying I love you,thank you, encouraging words etc)
2. Acts Of Service (assisting them in anyway you can eg cooking their meals, taking out the trash, fixig their car, typing their school assignment for them etc)
3. Quality time (talking together, eating together , going out etc
4. Physical affection (kissing, holding hands,massages, hand on the sex etc)
5. Gifts

I will add one more which I call :-

6. Quiet support( which might involve giving your mate some breathing space or listening attentively without offering advice,or a reassuring hand on the shoulder etc)


This sounds (and when I experienced it, felt like) an INDUSTRIAL FACTORY approach to "love." I hate it.

And yes, I have been told I failed to fulfill some list like this before, as well as I have been ordered to START fulfilling such a list.

My experiences all showed me, that the fact someone comes up with a list like that, means incontrovertibly, that they just plain don't love you. And don't want you in their lives. They might tell themselves and you that they do, but they are wrong to do so. What is usually true is, that they love and want a personal FANTASY of you. And on the other side of things, if the way you've been conducting your life has not made them feel loved, it's very likely that you don't actually "love" them either.



Speed dating, how many guys/girls can you turn down in 30mins?
You're not guaranteed to find a match youre guaranteed to be turned down before you have a chance to show that person who you are find out who they are and pay a fee.

Any STD'S contracted by clients who do find mates are the responsibility of the client and fees will not be returned if the mate ties you up locks you in your trunk and cleans out your house. CALL NOW.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Thu 11/03/16 11:52 PM

If I were to say, let's spend more time together, let's talk more, why don't we go on a trip? That's the end of everything.


Not necessarily. If there's nothing going on, what do you have in mind?
If my team is down by two touchdowns with the ball and 8 mins left I'm the 4th quarter to decide if our season is over, No. If I'm paying for a trip I don't want to take, No.

This is a breakdown in communication, or a complete lack of attention/understanding the partner, or worse the partner doesn't care what you like/want/need because they want to control you.

Cat, you gave three suggestions, which themselves are reasonable. But you didn't give one (maybe not your intent but this has happened a lot to me) it was three mashed together in rapid succession followed IMMEDIATELY by an assumption that your three headed request was only one simple request that would be denied.
This confuses most guys and before we can figure out what the hell even just happened to us you're already upset because you have decided WE don't want to do anything you want to do. For ME, it's not true. I can't speak for other guys but this is a sign to me that you have no idea what you actually want. If it was talking more, why not just talk instead of throwing a flurry of unanswerable questions that guarantees a degree of dissatisfaction for you? Wanna talk to me? Talk to me. Wanna spend more time with me? Spend more time with me and find a shared interest. Wanna go on a trip? Ask me (while we are already talking) if I would like to go somewhere, give me enough time to prepare and or save money.... To do so reasonably. Spontaneity is fine for local hiking, bowling, dinner etc, IF I don't have the dash of my car in 10 pieces in my lap and can't get part to fit back in. If you spring this cerebus on us when our team is losing and you're lonely or bored because you already Removed Yourself by not watching the game with me, it tells Me you don't care if my team wins or loses, you don't care if something that hasn't happened in 108 years like the CUBS WINNING THE WORLD SERIES!!!!!!! you don't care that I am happy or miserable you want me to do anything else RIGHT NOW.

That's control plain and simple.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Thu 11/03/16 11:13 PM

I have developed a total aversion to this kind of approach:


There is an author who suggests that we have 5 ways of expressing our love to others including :-

1. Affirming words (saying I love you,thank you, encouraging words etc)
2. Acts Of Service (assisting them in anyway you can eg cooking their meals, taking out the trash, fixig their car, typing their school assignment for them etc)
3. Quality time (talking together, eating together , going out etc
4. Physical affection (kissing, holding hands,massages, hand on the sex etc)
5. Gifts

I will add one more which I call :-

6. Quiet support( which might involve giving your mate some breathing space or listening attentively without offering advice,or a reassuring hand on the shoulder etc)


This sounds (and when I experienced it, felt like) an INDUSTRIAL FACTORY approach to "love." I hate it.

And yes, I have been told I failed to fulfill some list like this before, as well as I have been ordered to START fulfilling such a list.

My experiences all showed me, that the fact someone comes up with a list like that, means incontrovertibly, that they just plain don't love you. And don't want you in their lives. They might tell themselves and you that they do, but they are wrong to do so. What is usually true is, that they love and want a personal FANTASY of you. And on the other side of things, if the way you've been conducting your life has not made them feel loved, it's very likely that you don't actually "love" them either.





This is what the editorial staff of COSMOPOLITAN magazine spends all their time doing, helped along by chick flicks pop and r&b music. Defining what celebs and high profile people tell them love should be. A look at their actual lives and relationships play out more like lifetime movies. People don't understand that this is all 100% financially motivated.
'Courting' like that still existsrofl $
Engagement $$$$$$$
Marriage (too soon) $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Bigger apt/home $$$$$$$$$
Pregnancy/children$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Divorce$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Alimony$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Custody hearings $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Child support$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Violation of court order/ back child support/ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Lather rinse repeat.


Want to "love again"? Well the rules have changed. Now movie tickets are $6.00 more a piece than what two tickets a drink and popcorn were and McDonald's costs $20 for two IF you don't have kids. But that's not a "date" anymore. Chili's or Applebee's doesn't cut it for most 'girls' one would be trying to impress (I say this because ladies all know that in almost all cases you don't ask/take us guys out or try terribly hard to impress us). Regardless, whoever is doing the wooing is spending quite a bit of money doing so for what 20-30 years ago would have been considered 'a standard date'. If there are other elements, mini golf, go karting, skating, club/bar,concert/sport event, it can easily reach into thousands. But if a girl is content with dinner and a movie it's still near or above $100 depending on the theatre and restaurant. That's sad.

To answer the OP, yes, I have been told,
1-6, extensively.

What I didn't do was 7 and 8,
7. Money for whatever I want whenever I want it. (seriously)
8. Knowing what I want when I don't know what I want and giving it to me even when I feel like you should have known I wanted something.
I'll even throw in
9. Giving me what I want when you want the opposite (nothing bad, watching a football game, not cooking spaghetti AGAIN)(Yes I did 90% of the cooking) even though I ONLY WANT WHAT I WANT BECAUSE YOU DON'T.

If COSMO says 'if his left arm moves more than his right arm when he hugs you he's cheating on you' would you dig through every pair of pants, hack his social media email screen his mail and check his phone? Kinda hard for a guy to be cheating when he's at home, with you, and the phone records tell what number every call goes to or comes from. There was a song on the radio about a cheating man so I must be breaking the laws of physics or using cloaking devices to do it.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Mon 10/17/16 11:43 PM
Ms..... It didn't happen. No that didn't happen either. Look. If you want to see absolute brutality Google some images from edged weapon or blunt object homicides. Have you seen anyone shot in person? I have. You ever seen anyone stabbed or slashed in person? I have. You ever seen anyone beaten with something like a table leg or baseball bat? I have, in person.
Shootings can be bad if someone is hit in the neck head heart shoulders or groin where the lagest veins and arteries are. It's also possible that there can be little to no sign that a person was hit if it's a flesh wound or graze. A razor knife on the other hand makes such a small displacement visible on the skin and even being a little over an inch long can penetrate to the bone and hit every blood vessel from the point of entry down to its deepest depth for the entire length of the cut. In otherwords, you can survive a through and through bullet wound and not lose much blood but be bumped or scratched by a razor knife and be dead or drowning in your own blood or drowning from bleeding out from a razor knife.
Add some length and weight to that flimsy little thing you may lose some sharpness but now you're cracking and shattering bones while the victim is very alive vocal and excruciating pain. People break the tips off of knives or put feces on them to do more damage and cause septic shock and infections to possibly be spread to others from one stab or slice or hack.
Now take the edge off. Add some more weight, longer handle perhaps. Hammer, club, baseball bat. Now you're crushing bones and bursting organs inside the body. Imagine having a broken hip pelvis tailbone burst kidney bladder liver, colon, all dumping their toxins into the blood stream while the victim is 100% awake and can't crawl away. Imagine THAT death. Now streamline THAT weapon for maximum efficiency, we already did that, no background check and if a 10y/o enters a store with the money to buy one NO PROBLEM! No ammo no training needed no aiming. Just get close and swing away. No hammer available, no problem, grab anything heavy or hard that won't break the first few times you swing it. It's THOSE crime scenes that are the worst. When people think about shootings their mind goes right to Nov 22, 1963 or execution style point blank head shots. Sure it's difficult to watch someone shot who dies. It's more difficult to see some beaten with a pipe or wrench whos screaming writhing and begging for their lives as their wrists and shins are repeatedly fractured trying to defend themselves then being left for dead or worse being slowly tortured further.
Guns largely do not do the amount of damage that blunt force trauma stabbings slashings or hacking with edged weapons sharp or dull can do. What guns DO is allow a proficient (which many people aren't in context) operator do do pinpoint damage depending on the bullet target and distance. Arguably, the worse you are (at killing with precision strikes) the worse the damage injuries and carnage at that crime scene can be.


germanchoclate1981's photo
Sat 10/15/16 09:15 PM


You gave enough detail, and that is understandable. THIS case/scenario is also JUSTIFIABLE. I lost fellow soldiers long time friends in set ups so when I say that I know, I know and it ****ing hurts. Justice lies not in the heart, only does the urge to have it. The U.S. Army patch and a policeman's badge is worn OVER the heart. Remember that.


What really sucks he was a Marine and served tours in the War on Terror, in combat and made it home then gets killed by some whife beating white trash tweeker. mad


I got shot by a tweeker before I joined the Army at work. Bastard nailed my hand to a wall with a 16 gauge nailgun.

Many many more of my brothers and sisters have died or committed suicide than have died in action since '01. On average 22 a day end their lives which I'm sure you know. Mostppeople don't know that we are dying at much higher rates right here in America than Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, or the other 10 odd countries we are militarily engaged in right now.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Sat 10/15/16 02:52 PM
You gave enough detail, and that is understandable. THIS case/scenario is also JUSTIFIABLE. I lost fellow soldiers long time friends in set ups so when I say that I know, I know and it ****ing hurts. Justice lies not in the heart, only does the urge to have it. The U.S. Army patch and a policeman's badge is worn OVER the heart. Remember that.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Sat 10/15/16 02:43 AM

Most of them are more or less correct, some of them are wrong, and they describe several of them so very badly, that even though the "conspiracies" happened, the description as written is false or incomprehensible.

One thing to note in particular in that list:

some conspiracy stories and theories, ARE THEMSELVES CONSPIRACIES. They are made up by the "bad guys" of the world, to manipulate the rest of us as much as they can.




If that's how they phrased it, idk. You're usually more eloquent but you're absolutely correct. I would say decoys, white rabbits, but if you crack the headline surface on some of these things you find far different groups of people have the same perception through ij and scientific method turning 'official stories' into I pet goat ii.


germanchoclate1981's photo
Fri 10/14/16 11:16 PM
Maybe you haven't read my reply but let me clarify a bit. When I said I didn't see a motive that would accomplish anything I meant if it was personal and the criminal wanted. to get revenge for something they are shooting the wrong person. Even if it was the right person they didn't have the right to take their life. As I said there are laws to prosecute murderers. If it was that person(s) intention to fill some void for someone who was wronged or killed they were not basing that in reality because obviously you can't bring anyone back from the dead and if you kill someone else it's not even revenge it's just ****ingstupid.

Now about the other case I mentioned earlier there isn't very much out on it but allegedly 3 men conspired to fill 4 cars with explosives in an apartment complex in Garden City KS that housed a mosque and many Somali residents. They allege the FBI via a confidential source attended meetings where the men planned to plant the explosives "TO WAKE PEOPLE UP". The men were reportedly militia members, but unless they missed one of the guys there's a fundamental flaw in this conspiracy (actually the crime they were charged with) to use A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION. They were specific on the numbers of men and cars and the quoted motive. 3 men cannot drop off 4 cars. This is glaringly obvious to anyone who hasn't just skimmed the report. People don't READ before they make a judgement on something. If it changes, then there is a correction or retraction but they haven't done it because it fits in a category that everyone wants justice for and or protection from. At the same time it sets a large group of people silent on the issue because we don't want to believe Americans would do this. This alleged plot also demonizes the Militia, a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT among those the government wants to erradicate.

So we have a conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction to wake people up to read about whether a case which could hinge a legal precedent to erradicate a constitutional right of United States citizens. The less information we get the worse this will be. We need to READ use good discernment do a little research ASK QUESTIONS and if the allegation does not fit REALITY like 3 MEN planning to place 4 CARS with EXPLOSIVES THEY PLAN TO DETONATE TO WAKE PEOPLE UP DEMAND ANSWERS.

Nobody leaves a car with EXPLOSIVES to go back and get a third and fourth car with EXPLOSIVES. Nobody. Car bomb car pool? Or did they drop off 3 cars and get a taxi or über driver to drop off the fourth car?

What does this have to do with the OP? When you use logos (not ethos or pathos) you CANNOT arrive at the conclusion of what is being reported. These are NOT mistakes. They cover these events repetitively until the holes in the plotlines or timelines or evidence are brought out then if it fits the agenda the coverage is whittled down to remove parts people would doubt and highlight the parts that if you spoke out against you would look heartless. When I say speak out I don't mean saying a victim DESERVES an unwarranted and unjustified attack, that's bigotry or racism. I mean speak out when someone allegedly does something or plans something that is IMPOSSIBLE like 3 men loading EXPLOSIVES in 4 CARS to "WAKE PEOPLE UP". IMPOSSIBILITIES like a somewhat calm steady voice reporting a suspect who has been UPGRADED. to wearing body armor now... wat evs, still shooting when 2 officers were down and allegedly some other UNARMED POLICE went in to extract the wounded officers LEAVING NO POLICE FOR THE SUSPECT TO BE SHOOTING AT WHEN THE CALL WAS MADE. That's what it has to do with it.

If the officers WERE still inside shooting his SILENCED TACTICAL SHOTGUN (another targeted class of weapon the government wants to control) wouldn't that officer making the call be WINDED, RUSHING TO THE SCENE TO DEFEND/EXTRACT HIS WOUNDED FELLOW OFFICERS? What the hell is an unarmed officer(s) doing on the scene? If they were, and before backup could arrive AND the news got access to the audio from the radio traffic wouldn't they have the exchange reporting officers down send backup and not JUST THE SUSPECT INSIDE STILL SHOOTING AT _________ well we don't know what he was shooting at but we do know it was not URGENT ENOUGH to EVOKE the APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF ADRENALINE in whatever 'officer' made the radio call. Again the QUIET GUNSHOT SOUNDS in the background say this CANNOT BE A SHOTGUN, CANNOT BE A SHOTGUN INDOORS OR BETWEEN BUILDINGS, OR CANNOT BE NEAR ENOUGH TO THE OFFICER making the call for him to even KNOW WHAT HE IS REPORTING.

We should hear MOTION or EMOTION of the officer making the call. No REASONABLE PERSON would run into what they WOULD KNOW was someone PUMPING OUT ROUNDS FROM A SHOTGUN, and if there was an officer left outside while they did HE WOULD BE CIRCULATING MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF ADRENALINE and MENTION THAT ----- AND ----- just went in UNARMED SEND ABULANCE EMT SWAT POLICE HELICOPTER AND LIFE FLIGHT.

Btw a movie is due to hit theaters soon with a conscientious objector medic in what looks like WWI. Hacksaw Ridge. Watch the trailer.
While you're at it take a look at where the term conspiracy theory came from, how it came to be used and what it's connotation is in our (U.S.) lexicon. I believe you are well aware that conspiracy is an actual crime.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Fri 10/14/16 05:34 PM




Isn't 'critical condition' different than DEAD? Wait, not DEAD, killed. I want to accurately reply to your post. That was your topic, killed, not critical condition as they were reported today on the news. Killed would also be different than unknown, which was what you say in your initial post on your topic.

They said it was another domestic dispute response, at which the suspect produced a tactical shotgun? And that the officers that pulled out the two injured officers didn't have guns? But the suspect is dead.... There was a call radio I believe they didn't specify where an officer says the suspect is still shooting, and the shots heard in that call are relatively quiet, unless it was a silenced 410 which isn't very likely.

SHOTGUNS ARE LOUD, really loud. Especially loud indoors or in tight quarters between buildings which anyone who has every personally fired or heard a shotgun being fired would know. The shots couldn't be coming from a shotgun which means they couldn't be coming from the suspect, which means the call couldn't have been coming from an officer who knew what was going on at that alleged scene. It's a good thing the officers aren't dead, killed, you said killed. Then you said IF they die, which means they haven't been killed.


It was a damn typo, there was no real information when I posted the thread and they wont let you change the title.


Ok LP, but this is fundamentally flawed. Remember the last shooting you posted? Remember the SAME SCRIPT, domestic disturbance, his father said he was crazy, swat team, escape keep your doors locked... The story didn't unfold it unraveled. It was fundamentally flawed, when you recreate the story the timing numbers placement timing then silence lather rinse repeat. It had the SAME TITLE. And when do they do this, it corresponds with political events or document dumps and they drop another incident before the one people follow unfolds to COVER inconsistencies and impossibilities. The people who do this crap want nothing but gut reaction so strong that you don't notice the words don't match the pictures. They come in groups so they can multiply the reaction with the SAME SCRIPT.
Look AS A POLICE OFFICER at the Chelsea/NJ bomb/shootout. Use GOOD DISCERNMENT, have you ever seen a bomb in a plastic trashcan that didn't destroy the trashcan? Ever see a bomb in a metal recycling bin that didn't destroy the recycling bin? Would you call that person an experienced bomb maker? Ever see a injured perp pulled out of an ambulance for a photo op but the guy looks like he's just bored to death with one gunshot wound near the bicep? Take a good look at THAT wound. Take a good look at the EVIDENCE.
Take a good look at the Orange theory surveillance video of the 'explosion' taking into consideration the BLASTWAVE and what EFFECT it has on the MATERIALS you see in that OFFICIAL VIDEO OF THIS REPORTED CRIME/TERRORIST ACT. CNN reported that the guy was ''incapacitated and intubated'' from the shootout but appeared in court via Skype or some 5hit in court where he was charged with attempted murder and WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE AGAIN.
ASK QUESTIONS.


What does that have to do with cops being ambushed on a daily basis?

I don't care what you say, a friend of mine was one of those statistics and trust me his death wasn't to shift the focus of everything, it was a domestic all that turned out to be an ambush.


Before I address that let me say:

I am sorry for your loss. Aside from personal beef I don't see any possible motive that anyone would conceive would accomplish anything by such an act. Which is what makes this even more stupid because you don't usually know which officers are going to respond. It's just an act of malice that actually has no intent based in reality. I would hope that the killers were brought to justice and have no doubt every resource available was used, properly, to assure that that justice was served.

There is another story developing towards my point I will answer your question when I get some more details.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Fri 10/14/16 05:27 AM
Edited by germanchoclate1981 on Fri 10/14/16 05:28 AM


Isn't 'critical condition' different than DEAD? Wait, not DEAD, killed. I want to accurately reply to your post. That was your topic, killed, not critical condition as they were reported today on the news. Killed would also be different than unknown, which was what you say in your initial post on your topic.

They said it was another domestic dispute response, at which the suspect produced a tactical shotgun? And that the officers that pulled out the two injured officers didn't have guns? But the suspect is dead.... There was a call radio I believe they didn't specify where an officer says the suspect is still shooting, and the shots heard in that call are relatively quiet, unless it was a silenced 410 which isn't very likely.

SHOTGUNS ARE LOUD, really loud. Especially loud indoors or in tight quarters between buildings which anyone who has every personally fired or heard a shotgun being fired would know. The shots couldn't be coming from a shotgun which means they couldn't be coming from the suspect, which means the call couldn't have been coming from an officer who knew what was going on at that alleged scene. It's a good thing the officers aren't dead, killed, you said killed. Then you said IF they die, which means they haven't been killed.


It was a damn typo, there was no real information when I posted the thread and they wont let you change the title.


Ok LP, but this is fundamentally flawed. Remember the last shooting you posted? Remember the SAME SCRIPT, domestic disturbance, his father said he was crazy, swat team, escape keep your doors locked... The story didn't unfold it unraveled. It was fundamentally flawed, when you recreate the story the timing numbers placement timing then silence lather rinse repeat. It had the SAME TITLE. And when do they do this, it corresponds with political events or document dumps and they drop another incident before the one people follow unfolds to COVER inconsistencies and impossibilities. The people who do this crap want nothing but gut reaction so strong that you don't notice the words don't match the pictures. They come in groups so they can multiply the reaction with the SAME SCRIPT.
Look AS A POLICE OFFICER at the Chelsea/NJ bomb/shootout. Use GOOD DISCERNMENT, have you ever seen a bomb in a plastic trashcan that didn't destroy the trashcan? Ever see a bomb in a metal recycling bin that didn't destroy the recycling bin? Would you call that person an experienced bomb maker? Ever see a injured perp pulled out of an ambulance for a photo op but the guy looks like he's just bored to death with one gunshot wound near the bicep? Take a good look at THAT wound. Take a good look at the EVIDENCE.
Take a good look at the Orange theory surveillance video of the 'explosion' taking into consideration the BLASTWAVE and what EFFECT it has on the MATERIALS you see in that OFFICIAL VIDEO OF THIS REPORTED CRIME/TERRORIST ACT. CNN reported that the guy was ''incapacitated and intubated'' from the shootout but appeared in court via Skype or some 5hit in court where he was charged with attempted murder and WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE AGAIN.
ASK QUESTIONS.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Thu 10/13/16 08:47 PM



laugh



2006, Howard Stern Show, guests Donald & Ivanka (whom Howard, with Donald's permission, called 'A piece of a55') Howard asks Donald 'so you know about sexual predators' Robin intersects exclaiming,"You are one!" to which Donald replies with laughter mouthing the words 'it's true, it's true'. While radio listeners wouldn't hear Donald's words Howard's watchers would see, with his daughter sitting right next to him, his admission, twice, to being a sexual predator.

germanchoclate1981's photo
Thu 10/13/16 07:27 PM
Ain't nobody got time for dat

Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 24 25