BOMBSHELL #1: Campaign Manager Kelly Anne Conway 'Trump spent money in Cuba in 1998' on ABC's the View. Confession of guilt breaking Cuban embargo.
Newsweek Magazine


BOMBSHELL #2: Trump Charitable Foundation not licenced to solicit money from the public in the State of NY. Foundations need a certificate to collect donations in excess of $25k.
Washington Post

Stop It! Focus!
Focus!
Geez.

You don't need a t.v. you can watch it online. As stated before, YOU DON'T HAVE TO VOTE FOR A DNR CANDIDATE. You can chose between Libertarian or Green, or WRITE IN ANY (preferably non criminal) person who meets the standard set forth in the Constitution.

I agree that most people are blindly supporting the person SELECTED to represent their party for president. I don't like either of the DNR candidates, and won't be voting for them either.

Here's the problem, while you're upset about the non choice for President not participating in the process gives them just as much power personally and thousands of times more power in all down ticket races including judges, school boards, Atty's Gen etc.

More people vote in the General election than in primary or midterm elections WHICH ARE THE ONLY TIME SINGLE VOTES COUNT IF THEY ARE PROPERLY COUNTED. All indications in the REAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, which would be the PRIMARIES, the votes WERE NOT PROPERLY COUNTED. There are more complaints of ELECTION FRAUD than in the last two presidential races combined. There are many lawsuits in NY CA KY and many other states. If you don't vote, you condone those CRIMES. If you do vote for somebody else THEN you can consider yourself worth your salt as a citizen. If not, you're MORE RESPONSIBLE for corruption up and down ticket than those who vote for DNR Selects for President because YOU didn't stop the criminals that support and contribute to their crimes as well as commit crimes of their own. The ONLY WAY we are going to regain some semblance of control of our country is by sending a sharp clear unmistakable message to the DNR party is by electing small or independent parties across the board. The DNC and the RNC are not listening to citizens. Trump isn't a populist candidate or an outsider HE'S a DEMOCRAT. Hillary isn't the first female democrat to be nominated by the DNC for President, SHES A REPUBLICAN who's more bloodthirsty than REPUBLICAN Bill was. Why don't they run in the parties they align with? So we get a PREDETERMINED OUTCOME AND BELIEVE THAT WE ACTUALLY CHOSE IT WHEN THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL WE WOULD REASONABLY ARRIVE THERE ON OUR OWN.

Why the hell isn't it Ryan vs Biden? That's what millions of people were thinking then asking ONCE IT WAS ALREADY TOO LATE. sorry! You get Trump's hair or Hillary's cackle.

Impeach them, they dare you, then we get vampire Tim Kaine or vampire Mike Pence. Most people don't even know who they are and people in the DNR parties didn't want them as VP. They are security blankets to anyone thinking about impeachment because you'd have to 'outwardly clean looking' people to oust which wouldn't happen in 4 years time. Then if the house speaker toes their line even a second impeachment would be meaningless. Think our establishment house senate governors and mayors would let that happen? Who's funding THEIR campaigns? We need to start looking now for people top to bottom that have nothing to do with think tanks, councils, committees, boards, banks or real estate. They run the gamit from policy to legislation crimes and cover-ups.
It is disgusting that these two people are staining our ballots. We can do better. There are 200,000,000 people that didn't vote for either of them in the primary. This is what the DNR parties have given us. Even if half of those people are children or ineligible to vote there is more than enough possibility to put forth better candidates.

Millions of us pick it up or have interest in it but once the sticker shock sets in.... back on the shelf it goes. Plus you have to think about products all people know by name even without having seen or owned it. Ex. Nike anything. Indonesia, China, Taiwan..... I mean if we want something made in some exotic place what's wrong with the U.S. Virgin Isles PHIL KNIGHT?

Msharmony, they are both criminals. Trump is a discriminating extortionist and tax evader. Clinton has broken more laws just having to do with classified information perjury and destruction of evidence than General David Petraeus and Bradley/Chelsea Manning combined.

Everybody---- we don't have to vote for either of these two. You can still vote for two official candidates in the race or write in any non criminal you so choose. At least then you know you did your part not turning our country into a WWE or WW3 contributor.

He should PAY his taxes at the next debate.



LOL This is funny, he's probably the most audited person in the US, I doubt very much he's skirting outside of the fiscal rules, he was a businessman and took advantage of the loopholes afforded by someone before him.

Don't blame the player... fix the rules of the game!

I'm pretty sure they'll find more on you than they could ever find on him. You all created the Donald Trumps of the world, deal with it!

The irony, Mark Cuban flashing his goddam face at this event,
Scoundrel!!!!!


Damn straight he should pay his taxes. As for the 'rules of the game' when bus loads of lawyers show up at courthouses and reduce the value of 'some of the most amazing assets' and he pays little to nothing WE ALL LOSE. If I owed anything to the IRS, a few hundred of in the low thousands, I earn $0 until that 'debt' is satisfied. I don't have a bus load of tax lawyers on retainer, I don't have any lawyers of any kind on retainer. Besides that, my measly few hundos are easily exhausted with god knows how many IRS agents working Trump's network of shell corp's in who knows how many states colonies and abroad. Out of all his companies name one non defunct company that produces its merchandise in the U.S. besides his son's winery. ---- Right.



Honestly I couldn't care less if he's worth $4 or $10B. I know all I need to know that I don't agree with ANYONE stiffing the public when they themselves are currently still rich. If I can't make a payment that one thing because my 'tax debt' for the past 10 years wouldn't match what one of his shells owes this year.
Yet if I were to default I'd be fined, interest, on top of principle and I have little to no recourse when that money could make or break me. He could lose $ 40- 50M and be just fine. I'd be lucky to earn that much over my entire life. The IRS has these things called brackets, he seems to leaving out the b. Him not paying taxes or having his assets appraised below fmv is a criminal act. If one of us tried that we'd be in jail for evasion and maybe even lose that property all together.

Remember that line 'taxation without representation'? You're fighting FOR that?

Whatever is on top of his head is atrocious but if you close your eyes and just listen to him speak or read transcripts of his 'speeches' it's ilke 19stupidy5, and it just keeps going. HE is the one that has no idea what he's doing or saying. Again, you're fighting FOR this?

Define tyranny.

Define tyrannical government.

Define Manchurian candidate.

Define imminent domain.

This is what you're fighting FOR.



Dislike her all you want, that doesn't mean you have to like her,

Wait a minute there Donald, you said it wasn't Russia who hacked the DNC, maybe it was CHINA



Would this be considered giving aid to the enemy (there is no comfort in a sweatshop) ? Like legally with a contract and all? Well, there might be comfort in a sweatshop if it has one of those Carrier a/c's they make in Mexico. Who makes these deals? All our jobs, they're leaving and Mexico is taking all our jobs.

We gotta get smart folks.

They're bringing drugs, SNIFF
They're bringing crime, SNIFF
They're rapists, SNIFF
And some I assume are good people.

Adios Mio!!!!

The debate? What about the debate?



We won the debate in like all the polls. We'll take good care of the $18M, we'll put it with the rest everything is fine, believe me, go back to sleep.

Trump takes Stop and Frisk a leeeetle too far.

Did he buy that with Trump Foundation money too? Is that what he's hiding behind the 6 foot painting of himself?

He should PAY his taxes at the next debate.

You are right about something, the media is totally biased. Trump has set a record for (un) earned media on, pretty much all the networks. I'd like to see a comparison of the last, idk, 5 races and see if any candidate from any party over all the big networks CNN ABC CBS NBC and Fox tops Trump's time on morning Joe, or Fox and friends, or evening news with David Muir, or the O'Reilly factor, or A.C. 360, or CNN Tonight with Don Lemon. It's so biased in fact that Trump has two media moguls one as CEO (Bannon) and one as senior advisor (Aisles) of/to his campaign officially. So biased in fact that former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski who is STILL recieving severance pay from the Trump campaignwas hired by CNN as a panelist, 4-5 months ago? So biased in fact that Teddy Turner is running Trump's Superpac. Damn them liberal mediites with their cameras and microphones and fancy tables.

Oh! Oh! Germs! Germs! Get em' off! Hurry!

THEY didn't prepare, she did. She had a few flat answers, denied her gold standard tpp flop but in terms of performance on the format of this debate she nailed it. Still, I agree with your point that having to judge which criminal should proceed towards the white house we all lose UNLESS the committee on presidential debates opens the three coming debates to the Libertarian and Green parties. D's & R's have over a hundred years of running the country and in terms of organization and preparedness it should be no contest defeating either or both. What do they have to lose? If the DNR parties, pun intended, really represent the BEST interest and TRUE will of the voting age public there should be no restriction of organized political parties intent on serving the people.

About 200,000,000 people did NOT vote in the primary, there is no choice in the race past the conventions. DNR starts DNR runs DNR wins. We have to kill citizens united, remove the money from politics. They spend $25,000,000 in a few months time for tv commercials nobody wants to watch. How many houses could habitat for humanity build with that? How many meals or gallons of fuel could that give people who need it? Stop rewarding the people keeping us broke pissed off sick hungry and or dying. Almost all OF them are lying, funneling money, covering crimes or committing crimes themselves. Then they spend millions in OUR taxes covering them up and making distractions. We read and watch alternative media because mainstream media is not free. Maybe they knew freedom of the press didn't mean media operations would be free of cost because it's a public service when they wrote it in the constitution. Maybe they didn't. Some of us learned it in 2004, 2008, 2012. We should ALL know it now. It's another business.

No, I covered that at length as well as describing WHY a State Campaign CHAIRPERSON couldn't and definitely wouldn't be a volunteer. But since you can't read the post you're replying :

For people who can read:

I don't fit into the demographic he's targeting, college educated whites and women, so I wouldn't be hired to be the Chairman of the campaigns field office. Chairs organize, have notoriety, political or economic pull in a city community or County but the Chairperson of the campaigns State office is a paid position. As was Lewandowski, Manafort, and are Ailes and Bannon. If you think a Chair of a State campaign in arguably the most important State for a major party in a presidential campaign is not paid for logistic and organizational control, delegate selection and wrangling, setting up or moving operations to places within the State they think they can siphon votes from, you're insane. Why do you think they would pick some random flier lady to do an interview they had prepared questions for? Do you think news crew or journalists just run down people on back streets knocking on doors and handing out fliers that know dickall about policy or a candidates reaction to a current event or development? You think the Guardian has VOLUNTRACK chips imbedded in their journalists and camera people or.... You think they go to the campaign's State HQ and try to set up an interview with the CHAIRWOMAN who has some idea what the campaign is doing or planning that people would actually watch or read? Come on man...

The thought of a campaign field office that is the STATE HQ in the MOST IMPORTANT STATE FOR THE PARTY in the presidential race in the past 40 years the CHAIRPERSON would only be a volunteer if the candidate wanted to ENSURE LOSING THE ELECTION. That person needs to have connections with important people politicians business people STATEWIDE. You have no argument. Give up.

And it's kinda funny you say 'drop gun' as it sounds stupid, and sways public or jurors opinions that something that silly sounding couldn't really happen. Dropping guns is careless, they might go off and injure an innocent bystander. 'Throwaway's sound sinister, and damning. It'd be against the interest of the police sheriff, w/e to use such a derogatory term as well as create in public opinion that this is a practice within departments in the current case in question and others in the past. This would lead to distrust and doubt and be bad for the public image and reputation of the force.
The force shouldn't do it then, because no one else has any need to plant a throwaway on the scene of a shooting. THAT is stupid, and THAT only happens in movies.

No, not a drop gun. A standard issue throwaway complete with $3 leather holster. It makes a difference since they couldn't produce ANY proof he had one until all video cameras had stopped rolling and his underwear were exposed. Because $3 leather ankle holsters are concealed in the underwear of a DEAD OR DYING suspect and can't be removed from his HAND where they say it was without exposing his underwear. But they forgot that they cuffed his HANDS that remarkably DID NOT HAVE A GUN. Those underwear are dangerous. Imagine the damage they could have done had he stayed IN HIS SUV WAITING FOR HIS CHILDREN to come home from school.

Seriously, the 'evidence' is a standard issue police throwaway complete with $3 leather ankle holster that has the blood on it, there appears to be no blood on the .380 pistol itself which is an official evidence photo. The holsters is not, as it has no marker, ruler, or pointers indicating the (obvious I know but protocol in handling of evidence is critical especially in a homicide investigation) blood evidence on it. Don't get me started on the piece of paper they are calling ''a marijuana blunt". Their lawyers made statements folloin the official release of the additional bull5hit statement and photos and(officially) edited dash and bodycam videos as did the brother and sister of the wife.

This evidence, is also NOT photographed AT THE CRIME SCENE. Because it's not important WHERE the evidence comes from moves or ends up, only that there is evidence and that evidence supports the officers narrative.

If Scott had the gun out in his hand, why don't we hear it dropped or slid away as he is cuffed which is EXACTLY what protocol is? The dashcam mic even picks up his death groans. It also picks up an officers request for a ''bag'' in the back of his truck with some ''additional equipment''. Also why did they have to STRIP the DEAD OR DYING MAN to his underwear to photograph the ''object'' later determined to be a gun? Note: ''object'' is singular. While one could confuse the ''object'' as a holstered pistol it's rather unclear ON THE CRIME SCENE that is what that object is, only it would REFUTE initial statements made by police as well as their reasonable justification for use of deadly force AND the pre release CYA statement that was released with other photos to warm up the grand jury when they announced we would get partial release of two out of an unknown number of videos. Those pictures, while not uniformly tagged or labeled as evidence are clear as a bell INDOORS under fluorescent lightning featuring the infamous black gloves to contrast the 'marijuana blunt'.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, even if Scott did everything you say he did, you are an EMBARRASSMENT of the highest order. Oh, you don't understand order, or laws, or protocols, or procedures, or training, or when NOT to shoot someone to death, or how not to try to cover it up without the people knowing, or how to handle evidence, or how to photograph evidence, or how to conduct an investigation. That's why the SBI dumped custody of the videos back to you, because the video audio statements positions and evidence are TAINTED.
STOP LYING NOW! It's just going to cost the tax payers more money when the innocent city of Charlotte has to pay for YOUR crimes. If you don't want another Jonathan Farrell (who we have not forgotten) case on your hands stop shooting at people until they start shooting or LEAVE YOUR GUNS AT THE STATION since you don't know how to stop them from going off repeatedly when someone (black, unarmed, or both) is in front of you.

I don't fit into the demographic he's targeting, college educated whites and women, so I wouldn't be hired to be the Chairman of the campaigns field office. Chairs organize, have notoriety, political or economic pull in a city community or County but the Chairperson of the campaigns State office is a paid position. As was Lewandowski, Manafort, and are Ailes and Bannon. If you think a Chair of a State campaign in arguably the most important State for a major party in a presidential campaign is not paid for logistic and organizational control, delegate selection and wrangling, setting up or moving operations to places within the State they think they can siphon votes from, you're insane. Why do you think they would pick some random flier lady to do an interview they had prepared questions for? Do you think news crew or journalists just run down people on back streets knocking on doors and handing out fliers that know dickall about policy or a candidates reaction to a current event or development? You think the Guardian has VOLUNTRACK chips imbedded in their journalists and camera people or.... You think they go to the campaign's State HQ and try to set up an interview with the CHAIRWOMAN who has some idea what the campaign is doing or planning that people would actually watch or read? Come on man...

It's also a FACT that you missed her title in the link you posted. Ohio campaign chairwoman. That's not your average phone or door to door volunteer. She also said her business is real estate which is much like that of the candidate she represented. State campaign chairs don't just walk in and pick up a clipboard and start handing out fliers.

Investigate? It is a FACT that this is what she said. It's a FACT that she was being interviewed and chose to steer her answer in this direction. It is a FACT that she whether volunteer or hired represented the Trump campaign in Ohio at the time. It is a FACT that someone else chose to write about it in Esquire magazine. It's a FACT that what she said is f'd up and should never have crossed HER lips on camera or not. It is a FACT that she could have turned down the interview but was most likely officially delegated to do so by the campaign since Ohio is such a critical state for republicans. It is a FACT that news gets reported for ratings on ALL media outlets for ratings more than newsworthiness. It is a FACT that as a citizen it is more important that the news be accurate than to come from your favorite news anchor. It is a FACT that this wasn't taken out of context because there is a video where you can watch her say what she is quoted to have said of her own free will. It is a FACT that SHE is responsible for her own ignorance and bigotry which is also a choice that SHE made to make public. It is a FACT that this is one of the like great stupid things said in like ever.