Isn't 'critical condition' different than DEAD? Wait, not DEAD, killed. I want to accurately reply to your post. That was your topic, killed, not critical condition as they were reported today on the news. Killed would also be different than unknown, which was what you say in your initial post on your topic.

They said it was another domestic dispute response, at which the suspect produced a tactical shotgun? And that the officers that pulled out the two injured officers didn't have guns? But the suspect is dead.... There was a call radio I believe they didn't specify where an officer says the suspect is still shooting, and the shots heard in that call are relatively quiet, unless it was a silenced 410 which isn't very likely.

SHOTGUNS ARE LOUD, really loud. Especially loud indoors or in tight quarters between buildings which anyone who has every personally fired or heard a shotgun being fired would know. The shots couldn't be coming from a shotgun which means they couldn't be coming from the suspect, which means the call couldn't have been coming from an officer who knew what was going on at that alleged scene. It's a good thing the officers aren't dead, killed, you said killed. Then you said IF they die, which means they haven't been killed.

That's incorrect, just as the 'strawman' defense of the very factual problem he has right now. And while I didn't defend anything Bill has or hasn't done that we know for sure, Bill isn't running. Trump hasn't been 'exposed' so to say though in many ways I guess you can basically say that he has been exposed I think because he wasn't running for office he was inspecting unsuspecting half dressed 18 y/o beauty pageant contestants. Real estate is more political than business, the business aspects are really handled by lawyers bankers and politicians.
Two things you can't say is that I didn't warn you about him and that you didn't have much of a choice. I can't recall any race having an overall number of nominees as high as the 16 republicans that ran this year.

Yeah, but are ya sure?




Ya sure?




I hate to tell you....



This one's got legs.

On that pic, #DNR

I have a few VERY relevant questions since I was told I was "wasting my vote" by not voting for the DNC or RNC nominees for president. The answers are not exactly what you think they'd be.

1. At our founding, what political parties did we have?
2. When was the last time we had a president that wasn't democratic or republican (DNR)?

If you got the first answer correct you'll know the difference is more, not less than what 'separates' the two dominant parties today. You'd think a group of men that came together to write the declaration and Bill of Rights and eventually the Constitution had more in common than the D's and R's do today. If you got the first question right you'd know that's not the case. Whether you get it right or not you'd know it's not the two parties we have today. You'd also know that your vote for president, the highest office in the land shouldn't be which party, but which PERSON holds that office. That being said, we went through two primary elections and ended up with the two ABSOLUTE WORST PEOPLE for that or any public office. One side will agree with one the other side with the other but WHEN WILL THE PEOPLE LISTEN TO EACHOTHER? Does the party ever send you a check if THEIR CANDIDATE wins? And R's what happens if Trump is impeached after a few months should he actually win? Will you have an OUTSIDER who isn't a Washington insider or an ESTABLISHMENT politician? D's same question for Hillary, who's going to be running the show if she's out? Those questions have the same answer, NOT THE VP.

For the second question, at SOME POINT people got tired of the party platforms and made changes that redefined the party. I don't consider THOSE as wasted votes, neither did the people. As many times as it happened people missed something critical. Whether it was retiring an incumbent or rallying behind an upstart the PEOPLE very often were left with much less than they organized campaigned, protested etc for. We have two 'established' parties. One might have an unorthodox candidate with fresh ideas like the new deal or a peanut farmer but the parties themselves remained mostly unchanging or changed for the worst with new developments before the people figured out what was going on. Still two 'established parties' in control.
What good did it do to elect a CHANGE CANDIDATE, literally, Obama's slogan was Hope and CHANGE, key policies, health care and ending the wars Bush started. Trumps key things that are not policy are that he's a CHANGE CANDIDATE health care and ending the wars Obama (really Bush DNR) started. Trump meant exactly what he said

"I love the poorly educated"

Trumps campaign all the way down to Michele's/Melania's convention speech are the same. DNR

Why would the party allow him to continue if he made it perfectly clear that he was going to screw right through the tea party pilot hole straight to the guts of the RNC? They could have renounced him at any time before or after the first debate up to and even after the primary. It's all part of the DNR party plans. A mudslinging monstrosity. Tanking in the last 30 days and determined to ride it out amid the tax evasion and sexual assault/adultery scandal overshadowing the wikileaks emails and Bill's past. Sex sells, legal proceedings over classified info most people don't understand anyway is boring in comparison. that doesn't matter though. What matters is we get donkey or elephant 5hit, both stink. One criminal is more criminal than the other criminal, the other criminal is criminal more than the first criminal.

So I'm "wasting my vote" by not voting for a criminal? Or am I doing my constitutional duty as a citizen by not contributing to criminals in public office? If we all vote D or R it would be a wasted vote. What would happen if there were two or three more unflinching parties? We have two that aren't checking or balancing. We aren't meeting in the middle or towards one side or the other. We're pinned to one side or the other clamoring for change every 4 or 8 years. They recycle campaign strategy tax plans war foreign strategy and wealth distribution, amongst the political and rich. No rich person is going to give the POWER they have to all of US. Neither the democrats or republicans are going to do that either. STOP VOTING FOR THEM. De-ESTABLISH the ESTABLISHED parties. Previous gains of rights or laws won't be lost, only those that would take them from us. Case in point is the patriot act (unconstitutional). Obama expanded it, immensely. There's many more examples but that is the single biggest loss of rights and privacy in American history and 100% unnecessary. We are paying the government to spy on us. We didn't lose the constitution when the republican party formed. It was being chipped away slowly but nothing like what we have seen in the past 25 years. WE CAN CHANGE THAT. We CAN'T change it from within the DNR parties, we CAN change it by supplanting them simultaneously.

Use your imagination and be honest with yourself. If the debates were between Johnson and Stein how SUBSTANTIVE would they have been and how ashamed would you be to admit that either eventually represented our nation vs either of Trump or Clinton you like LESS? The DNR parties ARE adjusting the polls, to keep them below 15 so they dont get National attention. You believe they have no chance because of the polls and lack of coverage, and as long as you believe that you're condoning whoever the SELECTION turns out to be will have all the POWER you DON'T want THEM to have. Keep the DNR duocracy going. Guarantee you will NEVER SEE the CHANGE you are fighting for. I will not.

Lets start with the LANCASTER (CA?) shooting that's not part of this report.

Next, you said it wasn't a manhunt. Suspect shoots two officers dead injured a third and ESCAPED A SWAT TEAM, meaning they DID NOT have him in custody and told residents TO LOCK THEIR DOORS. That's pretty much the DEFINITION OF A MANHUNT. Period. Manhunt.

Next, climate... Someone all of a sudden believes in climate change. IT IS 100% the fault of BAD COPS THAT ABUSE PRIVILEGES AND POWER. Wearing the badge outside the station perusing ALLEGED criminals makes the threat PART OF THE JOB you get PAID to do. Utopically we would ALL LOVE a world where police don't need a baton, pepperspray, tazers, stun guns, pistols, shotguns, AR15's, smoke grenades, flashbangs, body armor, helmets with face shields, pretorian shields, sniper rifles, battering rams, armored vehicles, blinding lazers, high pressure water cannons, helicopters, BOMB CARRYING ROBOTS, or radios to call in sometimes up to ten cars to capture beat..... or kill an ALLEGED criminal. That's not the choice of the CITIZEN, and it's DAMN SURE not elected officials NOT supporting law enforcement. That's millions if not billions of tax payers money that comes ONLY through elected officials who DO SUPPORT an occupying force, I mean law enforcement.Criminals DO NOT COMMIT CRIMES TO BE CONTRIBUTORS TO THE PRIVITIZED PRISON SYSTEM, OR THE PUBLIC ONES. When they think they are getting caught they TRY to get away. NO CRIMINAL HAS A HELICOPTER ARMORED VEHICLE OR 10 CARS OF PEOPLE ARMED TO THE TEETH to back them up WITHIN MINUTES. None.

I'm quoting your OP, there is no mention of him being a known gang member. Palm Springs is really run down if the cops can't tell a domestic disturbance from a gang shooting. There was 0 mentioned in the news today, things like this make our local news here as do coverage of wild fires or blizzards droughts etc around the country. Wasn't even mentioned on the evening news or CNN. Not a word. There was 3 police cars in the only shot I saw connected to this story, I guess since it was a domestic DECOY to kill cops they opted for the CLOAKING CAMO SWAT TEAM. They reported that the man HAD ESCAPED AFTER KILLONG TWO AND WOUNDING A THIRD HE COULDN'T ESCAPE IF HE WAS STILL IN THE HOUSE. Unless MS13 has bought one of William Shatner houses with the TELEPORTER.
Look at all the inconsistencies and LOGICAL ATROCITIES. This would have been headlined with GANG MEMBER KILLED TWO OFFICERS AND INJURED A THIRD DURING DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE RESPONSE. SUSPECT IS ARMED AND DANGEROUS name age picture physical description vehicle make model color clothing distinguishing features. BOLO. Be On the LookOut. Give any information to abPD @ # TEXT SMS TWITTER FB. Its called STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. That's how



CONCERNED

LAW ABIDING CITIZENS

HELP POLICE

CAPTURE CRIMINALS.

Because NO ONE wants a MURDERER ARMED, or not, on the streets.

''Bullet for bullet'' that sounds a lot like GANG RETALIATION or VIGILANTE JUSTICE, don't the police tell citizens that's ILLEGAL? I'm shocked. Where would you get such an idea?

WHO called 911?
A, CIVILIAN, perhaps that person WANTED TO DO GOOD and GET SOMEONE HELP BEFORE a crime was committed. Just maybe.

Are you serious? Releasing his name and picture or even a SIMPLE physical description, height, weight, approximate age, skin color, eye color, clothing, vehicle type if any, WHAT KIND OR GENERAL SIZE OF GUN? What is that? Is it like an incantation that will grow his gun from a .25 to a .357 or a .45? Will it turn a revolver to a fully automatic rifle? That is the most absurd argumenti have ever heard. IF HE KILLED 2 POLICE AND INJURED A THIRD WHILE EVADING A SWAT TEAM he might have an idea that police are looking for him. Maybe..., a little bit.

Why is it easier for a criminal? Where do they get their guns from? The criminal gunstore? Criminal gunshows? Wal-Mart? Target? Big Jim's Hacksaws and Handguns? Do they steal them from gun owners who keep losing the damn things? Or from (Law abiding) citizens who are really REPEAT OFFENDERS?

CAN YOU BUY AMMO WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD AND AN ANKLE BRACELET? There would be a RECEIPTfor whoever bought it. Unless they got it with a slurpee at 711.

Can't citizens go in broad daylight to a gun store and fill out some simple paperwork and have any kind of gun legally available and take it home in 3-5 days?


WHOA WHOA WHOA.
Couple hundred people and "pencil whip" reports. THERE WE GO. Now we are getting somewhere. That's called jargon for those who don't know, it means that this is COMMON ENOUGH that it has developed its own slang. So, who's fault is it that a Probation Officer would "pencil whip" a parolees report? Meaning just going through the motions ILLEGALY FALSIFIYING LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY and COLLECTING A PAYCHECK for NOT DOING THEIR JOB.

Conspiracy is not needed FOR PEOPLE TO FALSIFIY LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY, which is A CRIME and one OCCURRING SO OFTEN THAT IT HAS ITS OWN SEMI SECRET TERM TO IDENTIFY TO OTHER OFFICERS IN THE SAME OR OTHER CAPACITIES THAT THIS CRIME WAS COMMITTED... AGAIN.

Tell us, if this man KILLED TWO POLICE, SHOT A THIRD AND ESCAPED A DAMN SWAT TEAM

ESCAPED A SWAT TEAM

STILL ARMED

STILL NOT KILLED OR CAPTURED A DAY LATER

Wtf are THEY doing?

STILL NO NAME ID PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION? What if he runs into a church or school? Decides to hide out there take a hostage or two or 26? What if he decides to line CHILDREN up next to a wall and demands $10,000,000 and a plane ticket and starts killing kids? CHILDREN.

Should anyone in this police department collect a check this pay period? A PD THAT DOESN'T THINK ITS IMPORTANT TO CATCH A MENTALLY DISTURBED ARMED AND DANGEROUS MURDERER THAT A WHOLE SWAT TEAM LET HIM ESCAPE? Should ANYONE IN THIS POLICE DEPARTMENT INVOLVED IN THIS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM COMMON SENSE AND SENSE OF DUTY ever collect another paycheck? The Cheif, the SWAT brass, lead investigator, OFFICER IN CHARGE, DISPATCHERS, collect THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS OF TAXPAYERS DOLLARS to just kinda chill out cuz it's not that big of a deal, these things tend to work themselves out and any CITIZENS that get hurt were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Good job. Pay raises all around the taxpayers won't be able to get it back once we TAKE it.

All respect due, seriously, weren't you an officer of the law? Did you retire, I don't know specifics on you so I'm asking. Based on that answer I'd like you to explain, legally speaking of course, what constitutes a rape? Legally speaking, what constitutes sexual harassment, what constitutes a sexual assault? Legally speaking, what attributes would one present as evidence to the FACT that someone is a SERIAL sexual predator? Just based on the laws you swore to uphold. Give us some insights as to the legal proceedings and requisite attributes evidence and actions of a suspect accused of a sexual assault, sexual harassment or rape. Obviously there will be some differences between States, Federal (if crossing State lines or if one is a public official, the way it should be) or local governments depts or districts. I'm just asking about your experience on this category of crime. FACTS, not conspiracy. Feel free to post G.S.§, we can read them together and clear up any confusion on the legalese gibberish within.

Aside from that, in the written and video statements Donald did EXACTLY to a T what you claim the Clinton playbook is. He denied, sidestepped, projected, and blamed Bill Clinton who was not present at the times in question. As well as lie which clearly he has taught his children to perpetuate. This isn't condoning, its a condemnation on past BILL Clinton encounters of the 3rd kind that were not exactly kind. He was in fact confronted today at a rally by someone calling him a rapist. which he allowed the man to speak and express his grievance publicly.Clinton didn't 'follow' the playbook. Trump made effective comments and actions of his own accord, without any influence from party leaders or former presidents.

I think the actual legal insight into criminal speech/behavior and subsequent and related actions appropriate to the FACTS here is what's actually important. We can talk about the DNR party later.

Question 1. If this guy just murdered 2 cops and wounded a third and not in custody and armed and dangerous and had been in jail before meaning the police could easily produce an actual photo of the worst and most dangerous and Most Wanted, why don't they name him and plaster his mugshot on every news outlet on a loop until he is dead or in custody?

I mean, if it's a manhunt, and it should be if what's being reported is accurate, WHICH MAN is it we are hunting? WHAT DOES HE LOOK LIKE so that citizens may AID THE AUTHORITIES IN HIS LOCATION WHEREABOUTS AND OR CAPTURE? That would be good right? Citizens HELPING the police? We do that from time to time. Since crimes tend to happen in PLACES, and involve PEOPLE AND OR PROPERTY that citizens want to PROTECT. Someone usually CALLS the police, sometimes they happen to be CONCERNED CITIZENS often ones who don't have a personal stake in the person place or properties involved in the crime.

2.Critical Question- wtf is Blankey B. Blank doing with a gun in California with an ankle bracelet that people on probation have to wear? The P.O. 's (not slang for police) do HOME INSPECTIONS. They are just as pervasive if not more than CPS.

I mean if you have an active non violent criminal investigation or a hostage situation where you know the suspect may use live video to escape or position themselves advantageously, then put a delayed feed showing a huge number of cops everywhere, or just loop footage of an assload of police leaving the station with split screen of his mugshot on the other side.
And why on God's green earth would you release the tragically KIA the day of when their families are watching but NOT releasethe name and mugshot OF THE ARMED AND DANGEROUS COP KILLER AT LARGE?
There is NO WAY to HUNT THE MAN IN A MANHUNT WITHOUT FIRST IDENTIFIYNG THE MAN.


WANTED: BLANKEY B. BLANK, has killed in cold blood two officers with kids some infants, and attempted murder of officer BLANKEY C BLANK, no relation. Suspect is to be considered. He might be armed and or dangerous possibly but definitely to be considered. He looks... like.... he might be about yey (not yay, gay maybe but not yay) tall, or short depending on your height and perception of it, and about... of middlish agey, there's a father in the story so he can't be terribly old, and we'll have to get back with you on weight skin color eyes hair clothing or any real DISTINGUISHING PHYSICAL FEATURES THAT MAY AID IN HIS CAPTURE. So, hit us up on Twitter or SNAPCHAT. There will be no reward.

Oh yeah, almost forgot, about that ankle bracelet... His was oneof the ones that didn't work so well. I mean somebody had to test the thing out, see how tough it is... You know. We could have ordered a replacement for it but the company that makes them only sells them in batches of 5,000 soo.... We didn't think it was a big deal. So this one is kind of on them. We needed that money for an armored vehicle that belongs on a battlefield, THOSE things ARE NOT cheap.

In case of emergency apply tourniquet at the neck.
If breathing persists keep twisting or ask a member of the staff to assist you. .

Excerpt from video (2nd) apology statement made by Donald J Trump, pretty slick, must have come from someone inside or everyone inside his campaign.

"Anyone who knows me knows me knows these words don't reflect who I am. I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize."

He then goes on and blames it on Bill Clinton (again), who wasn't present at the time.

Democratic strategist (probably Begala) liken it to a hostage video. During the time between the written (fail) apology and the video (fail) apology Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) called in to publicly unendorse Trump. You may recognize the name as the republican leading most if not all of the hearings against Clinton. "I'm out. I'm done." was the first thing he said before mentioning having to explain to his daughter how he could support or endorse him after this. Paul Ryan uninvited Trump from a 'Unity Rally' with himself and Governor Scott Walker tomorrow. Trump released a statement that Mike Pence would appear in his place.

Billy Bush, a cousin of George W. and Jeb, recorded and took part in the conversation, though it was dominated, unsolicited, by Trump himself.

First of all how can you say something is 100% true when NOBODY knows what "things" are? It could be anything, fish tacos, ballet, sour milk, mustard stains. Even if it was one of these ridiculous things you, and more pointedly Trump do not have a fundamental understanding of what PTSD is. If he did he wouldn't say this or anything equally as dumb as this was. This proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that he's full of hot air -on this particular subject- because everything else he says proves it for whatever topic he's word puking about.
And before you say, 'oh well... he has-------' he has said the following
Our military is decimated-- untrue

Its a disaster-- we have born the brunt of politicized military action where diplomacy would have been 5 times more effective, and though the number of units has been cut, under sequestration the budget has increased steadily. What is a disaster is the perpetual lie that keeps getting re inflated and rolled out, so the disaster lies in what orders our forces to what ends. What ends? I guarandamntee he has no idea.

What our vets are going through (insert trumpism of choice here) -- is idiots like him that think they know what we go through for you and everybody in America that then turn around and talk about us behind our backs and call us (mentally unstable would be the closest accurate terms for this, I don't even know what to call it, it damn sure isn't a sentence or a complete thought)

What about our vets-- I don't know. Is this a question or a statement?

I've raised-- other people's money and taken the credit for himself just like the non Trump Foundation, I wonder if he broke any laws during that publicity stunt, since he clearly doesn't understand that YOU CAN'T BUY STUFF FOR YOURSELF YOUR PROPERTIES OR YOUR BUSINESSES WITH FOUNDATION FUNDS. Seems like he got the business mixed up with the foundation since he lost $916M in business and illegally collected other people's money then spent it on 5#!+ for himself.

So he has mentioned here and there, he doesn't know the VA, he doesn't know war, he doesn't know combat, he doesn't have the slightest bit of understanding of PTSD or what effects it has on veterans vs civilians who have it or how to even address it. Btw, any of the 4 things listed above can trigger PTSD. Trump won't even go to Chicago but he flaps his gums claiming he has the answer to all the problems there. He can't tell the skirmishes and battles in drug wars from an infiltrated protest that provocateurs turn into a riot.


He doesn't even know who was dancing on 9/11 mere miles from where he lives and 'works'. If he subscribes to CREDIBLE theories of conspiratorial nature he's just as bad as W, because what he said 1 is a flat out lie that never took place where he said (during a primary debate with a former governor of NJ, an important qualifier) and he misidentified the people who were dancing and high fiving. That day is arguably one of the most memorable events in American history, there is an official (not the same as true) version that is extremely detailed and someone who would have had a front row seat should know what those details are. They should snap out and flow naturally because anyone who actually witnessed it would be permanently scarred but also know things that average Americans or anyone for that matter wouldn't commonly know.
When he was bashing Jeb (which is the only positive thing he has ever done) he made out like he knew something and was going to reveal in primetime on National tv during a primary debate or soon after but he never did because he didn't have anything. A person that rich, influential, and positioned as he supposedly was could NAME NAMES, MAKE CONNECTIONS AND OUT CONSPIRATORS POINT OUT RELEVANT FACTS THAT AREN'T COMMON KNOWLEDGE. He can't do that. He had his stage, his spotlight, his microphone, and he was standing right next to Jeb, HE COULD HAVE ENDED ANY FURTHER DEBATE RIGHT THEN AND THERE AND BEEN A NATIONAL HERO THAT WOULD HAVE WENT DOWN IN HISTORY. Why didn't he do it? He can't. There is a very good reason why he can't do that. Well, he could, but he will never do that. That is ABSOLUTE 100% truth. He won't tell the truth, because he doesn't have anything. If he talks about it at all he HAS TO LIE, and there's a reason for that too. He's got secret service protection now, he should tell us what he knows, but HE WON'T. Physically there is nothing holding him back, but THERE IS A LOT KEEPING HIM QUIET ABOUT THIS, and there isn't a damn thing he can do about it.

Still, saying that the above direct quote is taken out of context is his defense for everything stupid he says when there's no one around him to deflect to. Every stance or tenant of his campaign has been reversed or he has taken the shovel loads of steaming dung the establishment has provided for him. He is the quintessential libtard who may actually be retarded, but has still infiltrated the formerly republican party. Not everyone knows that Hillary and Kaine are republicans, they are better at hiding it than trump is. It's difficult to hide what you are when you can't keep your lies in line. Knowing which party you are and what that means is also a big part of it.

"When people come back from war and combat and they see things that, uhhh, maybe a lot of the folks in this room have seen many times over and you're strong and you can handle it but a lot of people can't handle it." Donald J. Trump

Funny you bring up bankruptcy, Trump has 6 of them.
The New York Times reported that Trump filed almost $916,000,000.00 of losses in 1995, and didn't pay taxes for 18 years as a result.
The Trump Foundation, which Trump has not made a personal contribution to since 2008, received a Cease and Desist Order from the New York Attorney General, for illegal operations under State law.
It's illegal to collect donations in excess of $25,000 without State certification and regular auditing. That's also where the money for the Tim Tebow helmet Trump bought HIMSELF at auction, and the 6 foot tall painting of himself.

Wait a sec, if any reciprocal lawsuits come from the Saudis or other U.S. opposition and the judge finds in their favor, would it be the military the judge or those who voted for the Bill that would be on the hook for whatever the fine is? Would that also be seen as giving aid or comfort to the enemy?

Honestly Lpdon, tell us why you disagree with the passage of this Bill. mI'm pissed of at Congress, not you. People need to talk about this.

Not to mention Saudi Arabia is a key ally against Iran?

Do you think they will be, after this? I thought we were at war with TERROR, not the country of Iran.

Why Lp? Why do you agree with Obama on this bill? I do too, but tell us why.

Let's check the parts we know to be true.

The White House HAD warned, yes they did release a statement well before the veto. This has been talked about before the recent release of the 28 pages from the 9/11 commission report. One could argue this was the sole purpose for not only the release of the 28 pages but the redaction of them in the first place. We all want what we can't have. 15/19 was told in the days after the event, it wasn't some missing piece of any puzzle anyone personally affected by the event so why would congress have to have waited to grant the already present means of redress for those who ENJOY diplomatic immunity? Does this or any concurrent lawsuit differ from any DIPLOMAT who committed a violent crime? Except for the fact that neither Osama nor any of the 15 or all 19 WERE NOT DIPLOMATS? Or were they? Seriously START ASKING QUESTIONS. Not just you Lp.

The law may have been flawed? Bit of an understatement. As Obama said in his town hall, many legislators HAD NOT EVEN READ THE BILL OR KNEW WHST WAS IN IT. Really? Really.

"there may be some work to be done" to make sure it doesn't lead to U.S. service members overseas being sued. This work WAS done. It is called a VETO. It was followed by more work called a Press conference explaining the VETO, and why it was done. Exactly why it was done which would be " to make sure it doesn't lead to U.S. service members overseas being sued" in reciprocal lawsuits.

Senior national security officials also argued that it could trigger lawsuits from people in other countries seeking redress for injuries or deaths caused by military actions in which the U.S. may have had a role. So it wasn't JUST the White House making the warnings, it was the cabinet, the media, the CONTENT OF THE BILL THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN READ BEFORE ANY, YEA OR NAY, ANY VOTE WAS CAST ON THIS BILL. Apparently what the House thought we thought we would be thinking about what they thought we thought they voted on what they thought they were voting on this bill come November 8th was more important than what was in the bill itself (if that sounds crazy read it slower and blame Congress for their stupidity).

'could trigger lawsuits from people in other countries seeking redress for injuries or deaths caused by military actions in which the U.S. may have had a role.' ....
Don't say a word Congress. Just think your answers silently in your head repeatedly until... forever.
How many.... Don't even think it. IF you thought about anything aside from ELECTION DAY when you voted on this I kindly refer you to the INTERNET, where not only voters tell you what we think about a bill, what may or may not happen if the bill passed or failed, and the validity of the proposed bill in general.
If that is too much work for you, READ THE DAMN BILL. If you don't have time to comprehend the contents and implications of the Bill, basic civics and reading comprehension classes are offered at community colleges everywhere. You also have the AUTHOR of the bill that should have titled it the FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE ISLACALYPSE Bill. You might also want to look into the physical evidence of 9/11, which should have been the KEY EVIDENCE for any argument for or against passage of this bill. The case is somewhat cold but fear not, there are thousands of PILOTS, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS that are MORE THAN WILLING to present whatever EVIDENCE OR EXPERT ANALYSIS of any part of the event you are unclear on. That would be about 95% of the event but that work has already been done.

"But top lawmakers said the White House didn't press those warnings until it was too late and the popular bill was already barreling its way through Congress. Other lawmakers acknowledged that they didn't pay much attention to the bill."

You mean press as in press release, press conference, in the press room by the Press Secretary? Tell us then, how was it that this bill became ''popular''? Could that mean present in the minds of the populace? Pressing issue amongst your constituents and or lobbyists? 4 Americans lose their lives in Benghazi and government grinds to a halt to focus all it's time and effort to investigate into oblivion what congress was clearly unqualified to prosecute only to follow with redundancy every strand of rabbit hair dropped by everyone Hillary ever knew but HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF US SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN are put on the line by your complete ineptitude to basically THE WORLD AND EVERY GOVERNMENT AND COURTHOUSE IN IT and WE now are legally culpable for YOUR ACTIONS, below the level of COMMANDING OFFICER all troops followed orders and mission briefs handed or verbally commanded in keeping with the OATH WE SWORE to SERVE AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION FROM ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. WE are tired of hearing the LIE that there was bad intelligence. The bad intelligence was in the halls of congress, in house committees, and other lateral official and non official U.S. and international Aencies and could councils. If you want to honor the victims families and their legitimate claims there is scant need to litigate diplomats as the suits promulgated by this vomitous projection of law. There are plenty of camel droppings to burn in the middle east, the reams of poison fruit tree paper these suits are printed on are not necessary. And dduring this unspecified period of time when ''other lawmakers'' were not paying attention to the bill that was so ''popular'' what the hell were they doing? Playing pokemon go? Digging a hole to bury Clintons evidence and Trump untaxed income for 18 years? Breaking voting machines, breaking then last minute fixing the primaries? Fund raising and eradication? Selling Wells Fargo stock? Touring dumpster fires in Chelsea and Seaside Park? Bombings, that couldn't destroy a trashcan? I do realize that you are busy people, but really? What the hell was SO important to you that you couldn't DO YOUR WELL PAID JOBS? That you couldn't take 5 minutes to glean the grounds wherein such lawsuits could be filed? What happened to that loyalty to NATO or UN allies or the constituency en masse? A very accessible sidebar with foreign policy and national security members? God forbid you listen to thr president or respect his VERY REASONABLE action and explantation of why he vetoed the bill in the first place, EXACTLY what he told you he may very well do depending on the CONTENT OF THE BILL before it ever reached his desk.

Poor laut Ryan... Yep, you got some work to do. The destupification of the House. Step 1, find every copy of the NIST reports, put 10 in a box in the Smithsonian filed under 'blunders' and start over from scratch this time don't consult anyone involved in the original investigation, prosecute all suspect people ( every NIST report and 9/11 commission contributor), they ALL perjuerd themselves before congress.

And since it's quite clear this is what the elites wanted all alongHOW IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK THEY COULD GET PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THEY CHOSE THIS thing. TO BE THE PRESIDENT AT A TIME PERCIEVABLY AS BAD AS THIS?


Oh, I think that'll do it. They have been telling democrats since before anybody voted that she had 400+ superdelegates and she's the presumptive nominee.
BREAD
17 candidate field with Jeb Carson Fiorina Christie Graham Paul Rubio Cruz Trump +8 more that couldn't even logistically debate each other.
CIRCUSES

and then the tiger eats your a55 THE END.

Who is leading the sheep? What do you do on the products they represent? What do you do with sheep on that product (get your minds out of the gutter I'm being serious)? What number is missing and what numbers do you see? Do you think this was an accident coming from the man that helped finance run and televise soap operas for men (WWE) raw is war. Do you think in his years of experience in SCRIPTED PROGRAMS and all of his extensive connections that this was an accident? You're being fleeced. He's not an outsider, he is a politician, and he's not conservative or republican. He is a white (with a bit of Orange) collar criminal.

The snipers were silenced, they have yet to be reached for comment.