100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Topic:
Religion is Child Abuse?
|
|
no matter how many times you ask , the answer doesnt change wrong again MsHarmony....unlike you Cowboy attempted to answer the question in the context it was presented ...it may have got him in trouble for doing so...but then again that's Cowboy lol,,,,,keep trying,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yep, and bigotry is alive and well and doesnt always have to be interracial,,,, Bigotry is the purest form of falacy my dear, and usually it is the very one shouting loudest who is the most to blame for it! Without them, that fire would die! yes, and without the violent violence would die yet, I dont think we should just stay quiet about it in hopes that it will put itself out,,, It's all about the messenger MsH... and their agenda I agree, and that particular messenger is a self hating opportunist,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Religion is Child Abuse?
|
|
no matter how many times you ask , the answer doesnt change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believe its feasible and logical that the building was destructed purposely to control the destruction that was imminent. And how exactly are they going to put explosives in a building that's on fire. Think Mcfly. explosives already there for some other reason that i cant or wont speculate about,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yep, and bigotry is alive and well and doesnt always have to be interracial,,,, Bigotry is the purest form of falacy my dear, and usually it is the very one shouting loudest who is the most to blame for it! Without them, that fire would die! yes, and without the violent violence would die yet, I dont think we should just stay quiet about it in hopes that it will put itself out,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believe its feasible and logical that the building was destructed purposely to control the destruction that was imminent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yep, and bigotry is alive and well and doesnt always have to be interracial,,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
understandable, but I didnt see any of those people in the vidoe for this thread,,,, That's my point! It was "those" people he was talking about! He did however, have his OWN agenda! Prestidigitation! I dont know which specific people he referred to,,,but judging by his other videos, he wasnt particular about which 'monkies' he was referring to..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
understandable, but I didnt see any of those people in the vidoe for this thread,,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 04/17/12 07:54 AM
|
|
shoe shine uncle toms,, because they want justice,, wow those EIGHT shootings were of suspects who were sought and ARRESTED that is the difference sounds like a self hating negro ,, calling the uncle tom a monkey,,, And Obama is an Uncle Tom as well, so what's your point? my point is a black man calling other black people monkies claiming that the said black people are the uncle toms because they dare to address an interracial crime, instead of all the crime that other blacks (monkies?) commit, which this black man would no doubt rather people spend their time on,,, because it would be better to belittle more black people than to dare call out one non black one,,,,right? Luv ya H....but your over simplification, and understated issues, while I love your heart, tends to use the trees to hide the forest.... missing the point as most would see it.... over educated maybe? I think you over evaluate some issues and under evaluate others.... it's your logic, I don't agree with it much, but I respect your right to it. Most people are black and white about things however. When you over think something, you lose sight of it.... like the forest/trees scenario. Prestidigitation... but who is being fooled? I'm a "street smart" kinda guy....as most are, I see it and refuse to step in it. Books "teach" it's not good, but street learners have a little better idea what to look for. which part is 'over simplified'? the part where a black man is calling out people seeking justice for a dead child 'monkies' and then accusing THEM of uncle tommery? this man is a shoe shuffling buffoon, he sees himself as some exceptional black character here to point out to the world whats wrong with all those other black folks,,,,, if people would take time to view their source, they may find out just how 'simple' it is,,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IM sure glad he got to the part about LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES....
Voluntary manslaughter is the killing of a human being in which the offender had no prior intent to kill and acted during "the heat of passion," under circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to become emotionally or mentally disturbed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shoe shine uncle toms,, because they want justice,, wow those EIGHT shootings were of suspects who were sought and ARRESTED that is the difference sounds like a self hating negro ,, calling the uncle tom a monkey,,, And Obama is an Uncle Tom as well, so what's your point? my point is a black man calling other black people monkies claiming that the said black people are the uncle toms because they dare to address an interracial crime, instead of all the crime that other blacks (monkies?) commit, which this black man would no doubt rather people spend their time on,,, because it would be better to belittle more black people than to dare call out one non black one,,,,right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shoe shine uncle toms,, because they want justice,, wow
those EIGHT shootings were of suspects who were sought and ARRESTED that is the difference sounds like a self hating negro ,, calling the uncle tom a monkey,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think Im pretty real. I doubt they will have any reason to come to my or your house.
I doubt they will impede upon business to make something a 'restricted' area its all predictatory panic,, we will see how it is actually applied, Im sure the same objections were raised back when these laws were first passed, when I Was two years old,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from aclu.org Without getting too much into the weeds, most crimes require the government to prove a certain state of mind. Under the original language of the law, you had to act "willfully and knowingly" when committing the crime. In short, you had to know your conduct was illegal. Under H.R. 347, you will simply need to act "knowingly," which here would mean that you know you're in a restricted area, but not necessarily that you're committing a crime. ..basically enforcing the ignorance of the law doctrine,,,, So they claim a public street in my town as the site for some idiot protected by the SS (the initials fit!) as a rally point, he starts mouthing his rhetoric from his soap box, I yell he's a liar, and I'm arrested, It's ok they say I'm in the wrong?! Even though it is a public place!? THAT'S BS! except, you wouldnt be PERMITTED in that area in the first place, whether you were going to yell your opinion or not hence,,,restricted area,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
now thats a job
getting paid to party, travel, and gossip,,, about people who actually work for a living,,lol the great american way,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well, I have yet to visit columbia, but I have been in Mexico with other americans, and
this picture is pretty representative of what was happening,,lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so politicians really DO represent the citizenry,,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from aclu.org
Without getting too much into the weeds, most crimes require the government to prove a certain state of mind. Under the original language of the law, you had to act "willfully and knowingly" when committing the crime. In short, you had to know your conduct was illegal. Under H.R. 347, you will simply need to act "knowingly," which here would mean that you know you're in a restricted area, but not necessarily that you're committing a crime. ..basically enforcing the ignorance of the law doctrine,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think part of 'intelligence' is social adaptability.
I think she will do fine as long as that is part of her education. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
