yep, just as easily as attaching oneself to a device,, the expectation of privacy would be no different,, and probably less since you probably want to be near a power supply,,,,,

they should save their money, if they need the stimulation that much there are ways to do it for free,

I dont support vengeance (eye for an eye,judgment)

I do support self protection/defense

so you think the opposition is to the timing and not the actual proposal itself?

are you suggesting those other countries had no debts when they switched?

smh,,,,

there is actually some dispute about the interpretation, some books have thou shalt not kill and some have thou shalt not murder


killing is killing unless its murder, or self defense,,or even an accident etc

just like

taking is taking, unless its stealing, embezzlement,,,etc

or sex is sex, unless its rape, incest, etc,,,


like the english language, the 'context' of an action makes alot of difference

revenge is when one is acting to punish someone else, defense is when one is acting to save themself,,,big difference

we have 'religions' who keep multiple wives too,, they just hide it better,,,,


I think any religion can be seen as 'extreme' when you start to disect their books and the actions and consequences found within them (christianity has what is interpreted by some as Gods harsh judgements of flooding and leprosy,,etc,,,, islam has what is interpreted by some as harsh judgements of death for infidels)


and many 'followers' do disect and interpret the most violent passages in those books to condone and promote violence,,,

I know mostly peaceful christians, who dont consider hateful or violent christians to be being true to christianity

Im sure many peaceful muslims also feelt hat way about hate and violence

for those wanting more than soundbytes and others opinions,,,

you can read the interview (in context) here...

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/obama-to-iran-and-israel-as-president-of-the-united-states-i-dont-bluff/253875/

ya just never know,, but Im hoping too,,,,

its really just balance

there wasnt enough balance (seems like) in the home, regardless of whether the parents or the children felt 'secondary'

the truth in our home was that our parents were more than a relationship they were a UNIT,, you cant seperate a unit, one part of a unit cant come after other units,,,,

so, my mom and dad were one, and there was therefore no way to feel I was more important to one or the other, I was just equally important to BOTH and would never ask or expect them to care more for me than themself (although I understand this is becoming the norm in modern culture), although I also didnt expect them , as a unit, to love me less

but there was no, does mom love me more than she loves dad, or does dad love me more than mom,, they were one, they were going to have to work at being one long after I left home to have a life of my own, so there was going to be more actual effort they had to put into preserving their unit of choice, than it would to preserve our relationship of biology,,,

never

unless love=sex

and then, sometimes, it is,,,

is there one where she doesnt have sex with or kill or beat someone
other than the 'you look so stupid,,,' song?


that would be my favorite one (if it exists)

I dont think people ever stop changing or that they are one dimensional. I am one way at work, another way with family and friends. I am one way in an online conversation, another way in real time. Thats just the nature of people to adapt to situations and environments.

There are those who intentially try to DECEIVE and I dont know why they do it. But I think often times we mistake someone being complex with being 'fake' when they make any changes or show anything that might be seen as inconsistency in their behaviors or words.

For me 'fake' is that person who pretends to feel one way about someone in the company of some, and then the total OPPOSITE in front of others. Like someone who is kind to their spouse when others are around and acts like they kiss the feet their spouse walks on,,, and then ignores them or bullies or abuses them behind closed doors.

These people are full of intentional and false AFFECT, and the kind that I consider 'fake'.


or someone who pretends to HATE someone in front of others, but secretly play and laugh with that person while having a giggle at those who think they hate them (ie. the fakeness of wrestling...lol)

it depends upon where the clinic is and what programs they have. Many do offer them for free.

no, not at all

anymore than I think people with guns are automatically violent

I just thought one of the issues being addressed (however disrespectfully) was the idea that 'giving away' birth control (for lack of a better word) might further encourage those who are promiscuous already,,,,

kind of like easy access to guns may encourage those who are already violent

,,not necessarily a right or wrong issue, just a perspective

I think there were several overlapping issues

the issue of whether we should make others pay for our reproductive choices (be it an insurance company or their policy holders)

crossed over the idea of whether such open and free availability promotes the behavior of those who are merely trying to have 'sex' (promiscuity)


and whether anyone should refer to a promiscuous woman as a 'slut'


basically Rush was personally insulting to a young woman (and by extension any women who felt she represented them) and I think that was the major part of the uproar, the conflict over who should have to pay for us to be able to have sex without 'fear of pregnancy' was pretty much overshadowed by Rushs usual asinine conduct

I think there were several overlapping issues

the issue of whether we should make others pay for our reproductive choices (be it an insurance company or their policy holders)

crossed over the idea of whether such open and free availability promotes the behavior of those who are merely trying to have 'sex' (promiscuity)


and whether anyone should refer to a promiscuous woman as a 'slut'


basically Rush was personally insulting to a young woman (and by extension any women who felt she represented them) and I think that was the major part of the uproar, the conflict over who should have to pay for us to be able to have sex without 'fear of pregnancy' was pretty much overshadowed by Rushs usual asinine conduct

best to ask that person using the term , because different people use them differently


hanging out could be dating or just spending time doing things you mutually enjoy together with no real interest in romance

I consider dating to be hanging out with an open possibility to romance

people will often say 'this isnt a date', to take away the pressure of trying to build a romance or being expected to be romantic

why is it that so many other countries are able to have a healthcare system which is 'universal' but the supposed 'greatest' nation on earth wouldnt be able to handle it....?


Im curious what people feel the difference will be, besides the size of our country which loses its emphasis in my opinion when you consider that what comes out (the population) is what goes in and therefore size would not be much of a consideration,,,


I am sure some have spoken to 'foreigners' who feel they have a poor health system for some reason or another, but no health system will be able to please ALL its citizens

I generally hear the flip side from foreigners who feel our system of healthcare which bankrupts people and causes them to sell their homes,,,etc,,, is quite shameful for such a supposedly 'great' nation,,,,