Reflecting on the virgin births of Jesus, Perseus, Buddha, Genghis Khan, Horus, Krishna, Mercury, Romulus, the Aztec God Huitzilopochtli, and for my Vegan friends the Phrygian god of vegetation - Attis among others. I just love history and the stories that are created as placeholders until scientific discovery takes its place. Unfortunately, however, many fail to see fiction for what it is. Why do you ask?

Religion is only alive today still because of the way the brain is wired at birth:
(((The brain development phase))) the critical mass occurs between ages 2 to 11 for most girls and 2 to 13 for most boys. This is when the brain will allow without resistance or question information being said by a Guardian (parent) to be taken as fact even if it is false. It gets stored in the brain engrams foundational safe area.

Once we hit the end of the age group, many parents think their kids are being rebellious, when they just don't realize the critical mass has closed off from recording engrams without resistance. This is what causes kids to start questioning and having doubts about their parent's statements more often. As we go through life, when we come across anything that causes resistance or challenges the accuracy of what is stored in the reserved foundational area of the brain that was closed off during the end of the age group (12?/13?- Girls & Boys) we resist as much as possible and even use irrational circular reasoning when not able to come up with a verifiable defense. It is this that caused our parents to believe without question in the religion they were exposed to and their parents etc. on and on. And sadly because many will say I feel it inside me etc. And that is how I know it is real. But no that is not how you know it is real because the same senses and feelings can be had with NLP, Hypnosis, and even sounds, and music can bring senses back of security and other things. The majority of Christians are ignorant of the real history of the bible they believe in. Many have never even taken the time to read its cover-to-cover or research its history. Just as these evil scriptures in the bible, they are also in other religions that long pre-date the bible. The Xmas Tree comes from the pagan faith.

More than 5 billion worldwide lack critical thinking skills at a level that lets them live within and touch reality.

Many go through life from stories indoctrinated into their minds as kids during the vulnerable brains critical mass being wide open with no resistance to recording foundational data input even when false. Having embedded data/stories taken from a period where the level of education was less than a grade three today & the #1 pastime being storytelling & making. Just like how campfire stories today come about.

It is these people that would be easier to fall into the belief of conspiracies & spin on fake stories about unproven election rigging, covid coverups, Denial of climate change, & the world around us.

There is Zero evidence for a GOD just man-made stories that are cherry-picked in an irrational manner of so-called circular reasoning to avoid providing evidence for the delusions. But many will use circular irrational excuses and claims to say otherwise. Like the bogus excuse, how do you explain what we see? The answer to that is I am not the one making a claim that I know the answer is a GOD which many seem to think they can attach to the question. Prove that God exists first before claiming something was made by it.


We put people in padded rooms for hearing voices & saying they see invisible people. But when people form a group & run with similar stories with zero evidence these (Groups) are afforded more rights than everyone else. Tax-free status etc.

www.youtube.com/results?search_query=religion+is+nature%27s+antidepressant+

Those sounds are based on emotional representations and gravity waves. Recreated in a lab setting to provide output that we can hear and relate to between 20 to 20000 hertz. If we were actually right there they might be totally different but follow the wave pattern on different base sounds some we would likely not be able to hear in our hearing range and others yes if the air was around between us and it.

Just like the JWT pictures are also recreated from the feedback of the IR and other sensors. We set values for a wide range of colors and contrast for each sensor data value point that we receive. And the computer is able to recreate a representative visual picture that humans can relate to with the narrow view range of the human eye.

If a sensor data point received 0010001 00000011 in the conversion software it might be Red with contrast at 3%. Should that value show up again in a scan it will be the same for where ever it shows up in the image created. of next to it might be 0010001 00010110 which might be a brighter red at 22% contrast. and so on.

But in the end, we really do not know the true color we just use a constant representative as close as we can guess to values, and when the same value gets returned it indexes that color that we set out for the conversion. The Human senses are so limited to the full range of sounds and visuals thus we have no other way of allowing the average person to have any grasp on what the situation is otherwise.

Sound needs to vibrate the air molecules from one to the other in a series to get from point A to Point B. Although sound vibrates the air molecules around it at different pitches based on the energy wavelengths. Allowing for it to be heard louder in one direction over others. That is because the vibration (Ripples of waves ) are emitted stronger along that path.

As for the laws of Physics, I am one to believe they are not universal as most believe they are. Such as the Speed of light etc and how we calculate distances in space, redshift, etc.

The laws of Physics have been determined by measuring within our own galaxy and own solar system and mostly inside the atmosphere of the earth.

Science still has to update and catch up on many things they have yet to test.

As that vacuum has a density value that was not included in the formula when the speed was calculated. The vacuum of space at least has three variants S1, S2, and S3. Light in S3 can travel many times that of light Speed at our S1 and maybe S2 also. S1 is the density of space in the vacuum inside solar systems, S2 is the deny of space outside a solar system but inside a galaxy in other words the space between solar objects inside a galaxy but outside those solar objects such as systems, etc., and S3 is the density space outside galaxies and the vast empty spaces between them. We have evidence that light speed is not constant in the universe and is even many times faster than the LS science assumes to be constant. Hubble Years ago has tracked many thousands of light patterns traveling many times the LS calculation off far in the universe in S3. But even further to my belief is that the S1s and S2s have a wide scope of values based on the matter that exists within each. So in essence in some S1 & S2's in the universe, LS might be slower or even faster than what we calculate. This space density is the reaction between what we think of as Dark Matter and Dark Energy. It is this that manipulates the laws of Physics in the universe making it vary from location to location as moving through the universe and space.

With that outside our solar system light might be traveling at higher than our S1 light speed making our calculations wrong for the whole universe as well as distances and light color shifts. It could be that at soon as light hits the outer region of our solar system light is forced to slow down or speed up to the LS we know within our S1. Hubble sees light moving faster than light Speed calculation on earth but as it sees it appears as a smudge of light across the spectrum view from within our S1. What it might be seeing is the delay gap of it slowing when it hits our S1.

It would be nice to have a modern version of unmanned craft equipped to travel outside the solar system and test the light-speed variant. As well as run tests flashing light inside the solar system to be captured by earth sensors to run variant tests to see if there is an S1 distraction from outside S2 to the inside s1. Running a small number of relay sats that follow from enough distances behind to also capture the flashback light from the S2 to those inside s1 in order to calculate the light displacement and the space density interference which could also help expose what many think of as dark matter and dark energy as being just that density interference.


The problem is we might not have an accurate measurement of its distance to make such a measurement as we are basing distances on the light speed we know here in our s1.
We can Launch a more advanced Voyager 3 & 4 type mission with 3 leaving our solar system and 4 orbiting around the distance of Pluto inside our solar system. Each at a set in sync time with another that 3 would turn flashing lights with different color spec bands back toward the Voy4 sitting inside the solar system to capture the lights and use the in syn times to provide a set of numbers that would allow calculating such light speed and any difference thereof. On their journey out after launch many tests can be done in the solar system doing the same tests to get an s1 baseline set of numbers. And if the final tests for Voy 3 when outside the system send light inward to Viy4 inside the system, the numbers also consider the distance between both crafts. If the numbers come back different then we know light speed is not constant and is determined by the space density. We already have data now from the original Voyagers 1 & 2 that show space density outside our solar system is not the same as what is inside. That being said would change the vacuum-calculated properties in calculations also.

Should the results come back that Light is not constant then we also have a major problem the aging of the universe is wrong, the distance of objects in space would be wrong and the redshift of light laws would also be up in the air. Making our distance calculations for galaxies and other objects is not accurate anymore.

We do have tech that could allow us to get probes out that far in half the time now instead of 40 years using specially built thrust boost accelerators. Who knows maybe a new propulsion system I am looking to do some studies on and build a prototype may also be such an answer. The only problem is it only works in near to zero-G vacuumed. So it would have to be launched into orbit before it would work.

Love is in the palm of your hands when Covid lock down hits.