Of course it does.

the milkyway has between 100 billion and 1000 billion stars.
There are, best guess, 100-200 billion galaxies in the known universe

We may be a less than ordinary system, in that life perhaps existed on Venus, earth & mars...not counting moons craters asteroids comets etc, in our system...

if we are less than ordinary then it would make life abundant in this galaxy and next 200 billion

that aside every ancient text that i know off refers too beings (gods plural)

You use an avatar (avatars)
I am not sure how you are qualified to ask such questions and point out your observations.

I would ban them from every site - all it does is propagate false mythology..some may whine this embodies me who i am (zzzz) - to whit i reply it most certainly does not.

As for olde snaps don't mind them on a profile as long as they upload recent stuff

I myself like to know whom I am talking too and i don't like talking to no pictures, only avatars, them as they were 5-10 years ago

Lost 3 cats in the last 6 years (they were fine age - the last 23 year olde a few months ago)

So, I bubbled thrice; like a handsome man bubbles, all manly and like, and for love and loss.

The common approach, these days, is to tell them they look 10 years younger and you have never felt this way before, ever, and lob in your heart aches for their very being!

Generally fill their heads with unrequited nonsense. An unbalanced conversation, if one likes, where their input is pretty much hw r u and fifty lol as the man struts about like the mighty peacock.

Should you not fill their heads with unmitigated bollox, they simply move on, swiftly, to those who do. Now, who is to blame for this – both imo

Obviously not all men and women are like that

I always tell them about my gold bullion that I keep in my garden shed, guarded by the handsome elf king, and that i have already wired the money thrice

Op means predetermined, as in the ebb and flow of matter; elementary particles, atoms, splatagrammatoms etc, in the ether. Thus rendering what will be, will simply be. Which is where “is the universe a hologram thingy” come from, and, other hypothetical, philosophical & metaphysical malarkey.

Tis like wondering if the universe is cyclical (oscillating) – one of the many cosmological models – and would it relive the same cycle or different cycles

The USA is horrific at demonizing the poor..infact they are the worst at it
The current UK government (imo a collection of clowns in no touch with the general reality of the bulk of the populas - most of the cabinet are millionaires- Inherited btw) aspires to do likewise, and is currently doing so in a diabolical & nefarious fashion

It gives joe public someone to hate, told to hate and despise and how they are being cheated out of cash – that is why they do it.

Joe public, aka the ordinary man and women, need someone to blame for (insert any reason whatsoever)…eg say a squeeze on muffin(cake) cash to spend at the end of the day. And they are told work shy malingers and Johnny foreigners are all to blame for the attrocioud fraud rate of 1% if it is that.

Whilst corporations and the rich firmly believe in paying no tax, corporation tax, their share of the tax..and they view it not as fraud… why! we are rich and toffs and chipping in as we sit on piles of gold purloined from the bulk of the population and its poor scroungers fault..everything (insert no coherent reason)

Did not one of your presidents openly embrace mother Teresa – whose premise is no-one ever alone and destitute..and a variety of gods depending on belief system but contradicting that with the market..wolf of wall street seems fair reflection..as does our latest banks bonus pot…..despite them and their ideology and wanton greed bring the normal person to their knees

I look just at the soul which should be bared, even in part, on an initial browse/read/look, bit of craziness erring towards this side of lunacy. Them being them no smoke and mirrors needed. I am not going to strut about like a peacock – it should be 50/50 or there abouts. Sure I like my cuddles and sex and cake but I can do without and settle for someone like me of mind and thought, rather than settle for anything merely for the sake of it

I tend to pay no attention to pictureless ghosts and stereotypical writing and the illusory and false projections – who and what are they hiding, why do they need to hide themselves and so on

A simple question, I ask the voices in my head, would a person email someone with an identical profile and pictures, and, what would they think of them as a person

Most people will say love and other nonsense….what they actually mean is looks. They value looks, curious and illogical..sure some may value height (eg them in 4 inch heels and their height more than their counterparts height without heels or splendiferous) slippers or money for errant reasons. They justify it by citing personal preference and imo have no concept of true love

We all crave love and cuddles and cake and shoes…we just all go about it differently

The fact that say a simple shadow wasn't hard edged alluded to the possibility that light was a wave, I think, was the favored early opinion..or have I remembered it all wrongly... well I am very forgetful at times :)

The double slit experiment has significantly advanced into what men of science call a jolly good debate where the swill brandy ad talk pants, and loony slipper wearers, such as my self,call a bloody nightmare.

Infact the double slit has been discussed on every forum i was ever on. ever will be on and all that time traveling malarkey (hypothesized in the new experiments)

I don't understand it. No-one currently does. You will find the current version supports its either or, or both a particle (or packet on quanta if you prefer em terms) and wave.

Which makes your question difficult..Incidentally science proves nowt; a bit like the double slit experiment

I just side with Einstein on that one cause he was brainy

The universe - again no-one can explain it, it may be one:
expansion and contraction of near infinity (as infinity doth no exists)
It may be one of a great many with many observers...so to spake and options which are sometimes, all times or no times right or wrong
Mysticisms and witchery who can say: one can argue quantum entanglement, or our current understanding is sadly lacking and we have no true reference point..dpesite what men of science or religion claim

I am not sure of your question.
White dwarf formation is typically less than 1.4 solar masses and would only become a neutron star, modified supanova or black hole - with the addition of another body.
Supernova requires approx 1.4 solar masses - Chandrasekhar limit
Neutron star formation is typically around 4-8 solar masses
Black hole is typical 16 solar masses or greater

Hmm that doesn’t seem right let me check…..erm I went to the fridge for wine, no matter

Anyhows those are the main causes, or various combinations for black hole formation eg white dwarf plus say sol, or two neutron stars, and their coming together.

Electron degeneracy most of us have come across in chemistry or scone making
Neutron degeneracy is about as much as my mind can manage….

Someone said gravitational distortion is left – that is not correct – he most likely meant singularity

The point being we have something both enormous in eg mass and teeny in size, a point if you like…warping the very fabric of space time in every imaginable direction…This is never shown on any tv program, it makes me very upset…same with orbits etc


So now we have gravity – no-one actually understands. But for Einstein and me and that dude on those documentaries it is merely a flow in space time in all direction around a point, not distortion

To prove the existence of a black hole thusly requires an immense gravity field Chandrasekhar –what a clever man - in Einstein’s day..the former got the nobel whatever that means..as they give out for dark nonsense

Oh dear this is a bit long…. And that guy what’s his name from the max planck institute won the nobel for black holes (or did he erm) – supermassive

So there you have your ingredients; there are many, proof by inference and stuff whirling around and observation..I am certain I posted here on the speed of light or black whole thingie about what could or not travel faster or escape..although it may have all been a lucid dream from too much cheese eating late at night.

Black holes: known physics is irrelevant..I could escape it if I was running for the last muffin in tescos
Apparently it pulls space time in faster than the speed of light…which seems a bit odd given there is no such thingy as true vacuum (it means that anon true vacuum bumf is traveling, at times, faster than light…How you like em apples Newton or Einstein

No humans are white or black..
I think its still ingrained forbidden fruit deep in most peoples psyche,

I like thaty which is honest and unique

they number so few :(

Date her hotter sister
lessons have to be taught
she taught you one (it was that you are not in love, never have been with her, never will be)
fair is fair so they say...though I have no idea who "they" are.

Your just not ready for her at this moment in time
Which means you were never ready for her, not now or in the future

Love does not simply appear,
It cannot be forced
It is simply there, or not, that is why tis so rare.
Therefore, your are not in love
merely alone like many of us
we all handle it differently

Some people cannot go without the company of another for a few days. or weeks, or months.

it is simply time for her to move on.

No, shifty weasels that lot...I obviously loathe those pictures.

They are hiding the eyes, which are the windows to the soul, open book they are not.

*slippernote- some utilize them as a fashion accessory or as a creepy voyeur demanding more than they offer.
I am a 50/50 person, most souls are not, and contrary to belief I do share muffins in an equal manner

Sunglasses pft! may as well put a bag over their heads or have them, in a descriptive manner, explain the colour of their eyes etc; to me as my eyes, mind and brain sprockets are not fit enough to behold them

Its a bit like people using someone else's pictures or avatars imo they are not even entitled to ask such a question, the brazen cheek, let alone know my and my kinds answer

Actually avatars are far worse - they project realism that does not exist in any reality and I would ban them all....save works of their own creation kittys etc

I have noticed that too here in Scotland, on here or there.
Actually I am beginning to think it more common in the UK than anywhere else.

Fairly common no matter the site: (Face book runs at 10-20% junko, insta about the same and these are low levels in comparison to most other sites).

You are talking about the non real element that inhabits the internet in a parasitic manner, which should include;
Scammer element
Fake element
Ghost profiles
Duplicate profiles
Cheat profiles ( I have no issue with any attached person as long as their profile makes mention – tis honest)

The question is too simple. It can be expanded too: mining for ore, baking muffins, power petrochemical, utilities, machining, administration, research, robotics, etc

What percentage of the current work force, per country, jobs directly, or indirectly, depend on the war machine. A lot if you’re American British French etc And I am guessing the all pay more than $30 dollars a day.
So no

It can also be expanded on who and why the ordnance is being used.
Will it save more lives –
What if it’s utilized for oppression and how and who decides on morality

Why is the person homeless – no one should be put onto the streets…albeit its more common in America than Europe

All religion everywhere owes its origins to the same texts, or selections of various texts; some like to pick and mix them, so to speak, much like I do muffins. And oral traditions handed down throughout all of time known time – including antediluvian oral traditions..which is before time…hmm..and rarely mentioned.

Huwmans tend to basterdize all of these texts and many a soul who believe in their religion

Man created God…incidentally all of these texts refer to god in plural
All hail the lizard king

Slippernote
Man is responsible for death and mayhem and chaos in the name of religion..before anyone puts the boot into me I was raised a catholic and became self aware with all the texts by the time I was 14 – I have 0 time for the new testament

This is not new

However, few people are aware of these stars, errant black-holes, rogue planets, wandering the ether.

*Smiles*

Planck length. Theory; no-one can comprehend it either, well except perhaps max plankee...however you will find the closer they look at the scale the more noise, not vacuum, fills it. And don’t be silly there is no such thingy as a vacuum.
Inflation has not been proven, merely conjectured…personally its 99.99dot% pants.
Hubble discovered “red shift” -what’s that got to do with inflation or the price of cheese and it actually wasn’t Hubble who conjectured it…twere Vera Rubin ( outrageous you never got the Nobel – I and my kind are ashamed). If you wish to be more pedantic then it was a chap called Fritz Zwicky
There was no big bang tuts.

Venus, Earth and Mars all had healthy atmospheres by our standards, most likely (you were initially correct as has been pointed out there is most likely plenty of water on mars at the ice caps and below the surface…and remember naughty mars wanders on its axis tilt (obliquity 25 degree currently) 0-60 degrees over millions of years, as opposed to earths constant(ish) 22-24 degrees.

So erm there is plenty of CO2 but no ozone and a very thin atmosphere and water – is a tricky blighter and something called the triple point of water comes into play – causing the water to sublimate away, above the surface, even when the temperature exceeds 0 Celsius.

So you could (un)safely plant around the equator. Below the surface is most likely ice or damp or wet ( I don’t know the depth at which it would be liquid water, not ice, nor permafrost for rooting etc-in some instances it would be barely below the surface)

And say plant a few billion trees for instant – which if my memory serves me correctly the amazon rain forest absorbs as much oxygen at night as it gives off during the day

Erm, so for oxygen I think we are going to need algae and most likely liquid water, or some hardy plant that produces more oxygen than it intakes and plant a few tens of billion.

And if you produce oxygen then you will produce O3 (ozone) naturally. (Ozone is produced naturally in the stratosphere when highly energetic solar radiation strikes molecules of oxygen, O2, and cause the two oxygen atoms to split apart in a process called photolysis. If a freed atom collides with another O2, it joins up, forming ozone O3).

Allegedly:
Gravity moves at the speed of light, or gravitational waves in a vacuum.
Gluons.
Gravitons (hypothetical).
Muffiniums (Hypothetical and hopefully they will name one of the elementary particles; well they do so like to invent new ones weakly (weekly) to plug gaping holes.

If you believe that a photon, not at rest, has 0% mass; then any other elementary particle, that has no mass, would/could travel at the speed of light – in a vacuum

I myself am no believer in an absolute vacuum or a day without muffin.

Inflation -�� if you are a believer in that codswallop, and remember tis just the current in vogue theory for fiddling bumf with gaping black holes in them. Then, erm, empty space, or is it a vacuum…moved faster than the speed of light (depending on your view point and frame of no reference).

Black holes pull in space faster than the speed of light (or faster than light can move away hmmm) – thats why naughty photons and their ilk cannot escape. Which when you think about it is a contradiction..or does it mean that photons have an infinitesimal amount of mass. And of course one must believe that gravity is merely a flow in space/time (gravity therein lies yet another contradiction (or an atom would not be 99.9999etc% empty space).

FTL -�� who knows ;) but given all of above contradicts itself who am I to say ye or nae