Libs in Denial: NAU, NAFTA Superhighway, and the Coming Feudalism

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
May 30, 2008

For Katharine Jose and the libs over at the Huffington Post, the �rumors� of a NAFTA Superhighway have been put to rest. Last August, with an air of finality, Jose wrote on the Huff blog that for �most of us,� that is to say not only the libs but an unlikely ally in the personage of **** Cheney, �this is over.� Jose tells us that even the �conservatives� over at Townhall have officially washed their hands of the supposed rumor, marking it up as a tinfoil hatted conspiracy. I guess that leaves the rest of us � dismissively excused as John Birchers � who understand full well there is indeed a plan to implement a NAFTA Superhighway. It�s not going away because, according to Jose, blogs perpetuate the myth and, besides, it serves as a rallying point to dump on Bush. Ms. Jose misses the mark by a country mile, but then this is a trademark of libs far and wide. After all, she takes pride in belonging to the �non-conspiracy-prone left.�



In April, House Rep. Marcy Kaptur, a Democrat from Ohio, gave the putative conspiracy a boost when she took to the floor and declared with chart and concise oration that indeed the NAFTA Superhighway � Cheney and libs notwithstanding � is a bedrock reality (see video). Kaptur even went so far as to pin the blame on the same elites that the supposed Birchers indict, surprising as she is the most senior Democratic woman on the influential House Appropriations Committee. But it is her position on the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development subcommittee that lends credence to her presentation on the floor of the House, not that we should expect Huff libs and �conservatives� at Townhall and elsewhere to take much note. Remember, they have made up their minds � it is a kooky fringe that believes there is such a thing as a conniving elite, determined to wipe away our sovereignty.





Let�s give Lou Dobbs a hand for his unflagging commitment to reveal the truth not only about the NAFTA Superhighway but the NAU, SPP, and the plan to turn America into a third world wasteland � or more precisely a slave plantation based on the China model � although he does not characterize the globalist agenda as such. �Only a fool would refuse to see� what is right before his or her eyes, Dobbs admonishes. Obviously, there are fools aplenty on either side of the false left-right paradigm, from bloggers at the Huffington Post to those posting on Townhall and elsewhere.

In a way, you have to feel sorry for the likes of Joshua Holland, writing for Alternet, who tells us the NAU is a fever dream of the aforementioned Birchers, deluded with �xenophobia and paranoia,� xenophobic because they do not believe it is a good idea to simply do away with national borders and allow tens of millions of undocumented workers into the country, workers who will obviously undercut the wages and living standards of American workers, as the global elite plan, please excuse my paranoia. For Holland and the libs, the NAU is �absolutely nothing,� it �exists only as a proposal contained in one of a thousand academic and/or wonky papers published each year that advocate all manner of idealistic but ultimately unrealistic approaches to social, economic and political problems.�




No doubt they believe the same when it comes to the CFR, never mind that Carroll Quigley, CFR historian and mentor to none other than Bill Clinton, documented the existence of an �elitist duopoly� and its long-standing plan for world government, of which the NAU is a palpable manifestation. As Quigley writes � and he wasn�t a fiction writer � this elitist duopoly has a �far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.�

Katharine Jose and Joshua Holland will suffer as well under the coming transnational feudalism. However, as members of the controlled opposition � dexterously controlled by the likes of the Ford, Schumann, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Soros, and MacArthur foundations � they are blind to the coming storm and when they finally wake up, if they are ever do, it will be too late, far too late.

“Liberalism [modern] is totalitarianism with a human face” - Thomas Sowell


Friedrich Hayek predicted this, Feudalism/Serfdom due to far-left liberalism/socialism, back in the 1940s.

Many others have written about the One World government. Shoot, they've just about knocked us down to Mexico's standards anyways, devalued dollar, infrastructure crumbling and we're already housing between 12 and 20 million of their people illegally, how long before Americans start illegally crossing the border into canada?

I actually agree with you on all these points.

anyone who actually stands up for pro American values & form of govt. "with unalienable rights endowed by our Creator" have been so marginalized by the media & people with wealth...let's not forget the foreign money too. Sad...very sad.

We are digressing as a PEOPLE. I guess that why when it comes to God & country I KNOW so many are soooooo off base in their thinking to all our demise.

I just find it intolerable anymore to comprimise with lies. That's only cause I care.

It's all about getting the message of Freedom and Liberty out there, the dividing issue is how much of our freedom and liberty are we going to give up for the illusion of security?

I think all of the politicians who have been assisting in selling out our soveriegnty to this NAU should be tried for treason.

It almost sounds as if some people are suprised to find out that the United States is for sale. We've been for sale for a long time. Didn't anyone notice that we don't actually own our own national parks anymore? Nope, put up for collateral against our national debt, which we can never possibly pay off. Maybe we should allow drilling in Alaska before China repo's it and drill there itself.

I don't think you'll see Americans pouring into Canada, from what I understand, hispanics make it there too (and while those in favor of a border would never admit it, that's what they don't want here). No we'll probably go to Mexico, ain't no one left there anyway, from the way we complain about the way they come here.

Truth is, Woodrow Wilson is to blame for all of this, he's the one that took us away from our isolationist policy, and we've not thought about America first in a long time. We haven't sat back and thought: "We have people starving here." or "There has to be a better way of moving our frieght across great distances." or "can we produce our power more efficiently?" When America stops taking the time to be the "world's policeman" (Thanks Teddy, you fat ***) and starts taking the time to be "America's idea man" we'll start to be better off.

Raise the tariffs on imported goods, stablize our national energy base so we are 100% domestic, and improve the infrastructure (don't care how, it always improves our national economy {best when we speed up or ability to transport people or materials}). If we can do that, America will start to smell those salts we're putting under her nose and might start to rise again.

Now mind you, this means you might have to give up some things. Shopping at Wal-mart will be more expensive, you might have to pay a little more in taxes, but you'll probably be a little better off, so you won't mind as much. Besides, if we don't get away from our consumeristic society we will go the way of Rome, and that right soon.

Americans..sacrifice? Hasnt happened since my parents day when we boycotted, lettuce, grapes, coffee and even BEEF..for the betterment of the country (which wasnt even ours, but we tried to be good guests.)

It wasn't isolationism, it was noninterventionialism that Wilson took us away from. Isolationists don't trade with people or travel or let people travel here, Isolationist policy doesn't allow for sending aid to other nations or sitting down at the diplomacy table.

Nonintervention, no entangling alliances, no policing of the world, no nation building. Thats what alot of the founders of this Country advocated for.

I agree with just about everything else, I don't think the taxes thing should be a problem, the minute we shut down those 700+ overseas bases, we'll be saving something like a Trillion dollars a year.