"muslim extremist group" not all muslim

There would be no reason for you to be angry with me. I have done nothing to you accept pointed out the absurdity of some of your claims. I or anyone else on forum has that capability.

Still love ya, no matter what you say or do, I will still love ya!

So ANY fundamentalist group is potentially dangerous correct? Not merely the Muslims. The Christians have been every bit as caustic over the centuries if not more so. And of course the US foreign policy in the Middle East had nothing to do with instigating these attacks correct? Hmmm.

Absolutly, I was merely pionting out that there are many misinturpritations of the early historical records of mankind. People whom call them selves "christian" and then go to the wiccan threads with the intent of being mean, need to examine the words Cristain of Christ like a little closer. Robert Kennedy, as well as many other have said this "violence always breeds more violence" we as human beings in no way can justify blowing up womens clinics and killing to keep people from killing. And yet some people are so stuck on what they have been taught by other rather than spending time in meditation and figuring it out on there own that this keeps happening. I don't know what the answere is, and if I did, I'm not sure I would say of publish it for fear of being shot or crucified or burned at the stake or whatever. The only thing I do know fro certain is that it will take the ability of two or more people to agree on what the real problem is to possibly bring hatred to an end in this world.

Well I pointed out tolerance as being one potential way to alleviate some of these tensions between peoples and nations. And singling out Muslims as being the root of all evil is not exactly what I would refer to as espousing the doctrine of tolerance. I guess thats just me though. Peace.

I'm not singling out muslim's, but to put your mind at ease I'll be careful to choose better words next time. I should have probably said relgious extremist with terroristic tendencies developed from an misinformed muslim extremist background which believes that the U.S. of America is the beast which rises out of the ocean spoken of in the books of Daniel and the Book of Revalation that were placed in another book we commonly call the Bible in todays world. However, I'm not sure that what I wrote is what I really meant, nor am I sure that what you read wil instill my true intent, but I am sure that as people pass the topic around the circle it iwll become misinterpred, so in conclusion, the best thing for people to do is probably research all of this on there own.

Four pages and I have yet to see you try and show what is the mark of the Beast or understanding of 666. I put out a subject of 666 and you just blow it off as if i do not know what the scriptures say, Do you really want to challenge me to my knowledge? Show us the path to 666.. Miles

Four pages and I have yet to see you try and show what is the mark of the Beast or understanding of 666. I put out a subject of 666 and you just blow it off as if i do not know what the scriptures say, Do you really want to challenge me to my knowledge? Show us the path to 666.. Miles

Yea he spoke so much on how many hours he had studied this subject thier would be some good reasoning of the scriptures. To me it look like his main thing was to try to empress us how knowledgeable he is and baffle us with BS. Shalom Tribo...Miles

Miles he said this in the opening post:

""I studied this subject for four years. The way I did my study was much like an investigator would solve a crime. I started at the end of the book of Revelation, and worked my way back to the Begining of Genisis.

>>>My conclusion was that the "mark of the beast" is ""lying"" >>or<< any form of deceit!""<<<


this is his conclusion - 666 "means" lieing or any form of deceit!!

that is why i wrote what i did, but he was offended so i dropped out.

shalom my friend.

sorry my friend - then you should have made it a little clearer for us - the "mark of the beast is: 6 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: {to receive: Gr. to give them}

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the

>>>>>mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.<<<<<<

- so if your talking about the "mark" being the lie. or the "beast" being the lie, you should have stated such - less confusing don't you think?

Both me and miles took it to mean you saying - 666 - which of course is not true as to what your meaning - now i understand, i think, that you mean - the mark the beast gives to mankind correct?

if not please explain succinctly what your reffering to? thnx

So ANY fundamentalist group is potentially dangerous correct? Not merely the Muslims. The Christians have been every bit as caustic over the centuries if not more so. And of course the US foreign policy in the Middle East had nothing to do with instigating these attacks correct? Hmmm.

I am not being hastily general here, hence the words, "muslim extremist"