100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: China insists it does not hack into US computers | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
That was exactly what I wasn't asking. But hey, thanks! ?????? You said, I am asking why is government even allowed to use the internet? They started it. The question should be why did they ever let the public use it. That question has already been asked and answered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was exactly what I wasn't asking. But hey, thanks! ?????? You said, I am asking why is government even allowed to use the internet? They started it. The question should be why did they ever let the public use it. That question has already been asked and answered.  That's right
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was exactly what I wasn't asking. But hey, thanks! ?????? You said, I am asking why is government even allowed to use the internet? They started it. The question should be why did they ever let the public use it. That question has already been asked and answered. Good enough for a government-owned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was exactly what I wasn't asking. But hey, thanks! ?????? You said, I am asking why is government even allowed to use the internet? They started it. The question should be why did they ever let the public use it. That question has already been asked and answered. Good enough for a government-owned.  What is that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My point is made....
talk is infinitely cheap. Nice to talk to this bunch...but, talking to you will progress this country exactly ZERO. Best of luck guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ThomasJB
on
Sun 04/26/09 07:04 PM
|
|
I am not asking how and by which agency the internet was developed. I am asking why is government even allowed to use the internet? This isn't a hard question. Even if government actually, truthfully, had some credit for developing the rudiments of what we cann the internet today, there is no justification that could be made that such credit should define who the internet belongs to. The government isn't a private party. It has no rights. It can not claim a property against what the people ALLOW it to have. If the government is too stupid to use the internet safely, oh well, they the government should be disallowed it's use. Just like you would disallow an access of a small child to anything it may find, that you deem to be too dangerous and inappropriate for that child. DARPA, ARPA ARPANET was first designed for use by the Military as a disaster-proof nationwide computer system. It would do away with the need of a centralized control station which could be knocked out, thus shutting down communication altogether. ARPA was first it was the organization that would become DARPA. ARPAnet was the name given to the original internet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one actually owns the Internet, and no single person or organization controls the Internet in its entirety. More of a concept than an actual tangible entity, the Internet relies on a physical infrastructure that connects networks to other networks. There are many organizations, corporations, governments, schools, private citizens and service providers that all own pieces of the infrastructure, but there is no one body that owns it all. There are, however, organizations that oversee and standardize what happens on the Internet and assign IP addresses and domain names, such as the National Science Foundation, the Internet Engineering Task Force, ICANN, InterNIC and the Internet Architecture Board. http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Internet/2002/WhoOwnstheInternet.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China aren't the only ones who are using the internet as a weapon again their opponents. Russia has been accused of attacking Estonia with DDOS's because of Estonia's political distancing from Russia.
http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2007/05/massive-ddos-attacks-target-estonia-russia-accused.ars I don't think we could stop any one country from having access to internet without causing great collateral damage. If you study how the internet works and physical connections made to make it possible, then you will see that trying to physically take out an enemies internet is likely to cause disruptions to allies in that neighboring areas. DDOS's are an effective weapon, but with a good defense don't do much damage. Worms and virus' have effects that are to wide to effectively control and could come back to hurt us. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHY DON'T THE GOVERMENT SIMPLY ENCRYPT THE INFORMATION USING ONE OF THE HIGH LEVELS OF ENCRYPTIAN CODES? THEREFORE, THEY'RE THE ONLY ONE'S WITH THE KEY.... ONLY DOWN SIDE TO THIS IS IF A MOLE IN THE GOVERNMENT 'ACCIDENTALLY' LOSES THAT KEY FOR A FEW BILLION DOLLARS... HOPEFULLY, NOT CHINESE DOLLARS!? ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHINA INSISTS...!? :) LIKE ALL POLITICIANS, THEY CAN INSIST OR RATHER LIE, ALL THEY LIKE.... THEY ARE SIMPLY THE FACE OF THEIR GOVERNMENT. IT'S THE FINGERS YOU'VE GOT TO LOOK OUT FOR! THEY CAN BE CREEPING INTO ALL SORTS OF DELICATE AREA'S... HACKERS LOVE HACKING! :) IT'S A BUZZ THAT GETS THEM HIGHER THAN SEX! SOME DO IT FOR FUN WHEREAS OTHERS ARE DEADLY SERIOUS...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POLITICIANS WILL INSIST THEY'RE NOT UP TO ANYTHING! WHO'S TO SAY IT WASN'T ONE AMERICAN AGENCY SPOOKING ANOTHER ONE? LET'S BLAME EVERYBODY BUT OURSELVES... I HEAR THEM CRY!? WHAT BETTER THAN TO BLAME YOUR NEIGHBOURS? IT'S EASY TO DO AND HARD FOR THEM TO DISPROVE!? THEY CAN TAKE A LOT OF BLAME FOR SOMETHING THEY DIDN'T DO... THE ONLY TIME A POLITICIAN TELLS THE TRUTH - IS WHEN THEY SAY NOTHING AT ALL! :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHY DON'T THE GOVERMENT SIMPLY ENCRYPT THE INFORMATION USING ONE OF THE HIGH LEVELS OF ENCRYPTIAN CODES? THEREFORE, THEY'RE THE ONLY ONE'S WITH THE KEY.... ONLY DOWN SIDE TO THIS IS IF A MOLE IN THE GOVERNMENT 'ACCIDENTALLY' LOSES THAT KEY FOR A FEW BILLION DOLLARS... HOPEFULLY, NOT CHINESE DOLLARS!? ;) Because if they did, then how are they going to make the sheep mad with chinese? You have to make the average American mad, before he approves some nasty action against the hated enemy. |
|
|
|
|
